{"title":"The impact of refundable state earned income tax credits on foster care entry rate trends","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Children living in poverty are more likely to enter foster care compared to children not living in poverty. Refundable state Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs) increase household income and have been shown to reduce the risk of child maltreatment using caregiver-reported and administrative records of child protective services investigations; however, there is limited literature on the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry rates at the state-level.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and Setting</h3><div>Foster care entries among children less than 18 years old in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Difference-in-difference analyses using the Callaway and Sant'Anna approach were conducted. Data on EITC refundability was extracted from legislative records and foster care entries were obtained from Kids Count for 2000–2019. State-level policies, including Medicaid expansion, paid family leave, minimum wage, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, were included in the analysis to minimize bias from confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On average, 0.5 fewer children entered foster care (95 % CI: −1.0, −0.1) per 1000 children per year among states that implemented a refundable EITC than there would have been had those states not implemented a refundable EITC. The reduction in foster care entries was not statistically significant until six years after families could first benefit from implementation of a state refundable EITC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A refundable state EITC reduces the rate of foster care entries. This reduction is statistically significant starting six years after the tax credit is implemented in a state.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424005209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Children living in poverty are more likely to enter foster care compared to children not living in poverty. Refundable state Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs) increase household income and have been shown to reduce the risk of child maltreatment using caregiver-reported and administrative records of child protective services investigations; however, there is limited literature on the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry.
Objective
To evaluate the impact of refundable state EITCs on foster care entry rates at the state-level.
Participants and Setting
Foster care entries among children less than 18 years old in the United States.
Methods
Difference-in-difference analyses using the Callaway and Sant'Anna approach were conducted. Data on EITC refundability was extracted from legislative records and foster care entries were obtained from Kids Count for 2000–2019. State-level policies, including Medicaid expansion, paid family leave, minimum wage, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, were included in the analysis to minimize bias from confounding.
Results
On average, 0.5 fewer children entered foster care (95 % CI: −1.0, −0.1) per 1000 children per year among states that implemented a refundable EITC than there would have been had those states not implemented a refundable EITC. The reduction in foster care entries was not statistically significant until six years after families could first benefit from implementation of a state refundable EITC.
Conclusion
A refundable state EITC reduces the rate of foster care entries. This reduction is statistically significant starting six years after the tax credit is implemented in a state.
期刊介绍:
Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.