Risk or opportunity? Child protection workers' perceptions of children's participation in the protection system.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107110
Hanita Kosher, Carmit Katz
{"title":"Risk or opportunity? Child protection workers' perceptions of children's participation in the protection system.","authors":"Hanita Kosher, Carmit Katz","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the last decade, children's right to participation in the child protection system has received considerable professional and researcher attention. Child protection workers (CPW) are key in facilitating children's participation in this system. Nevertheless, studies consistently show they find it difficult to implement the right to participation in their practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study examines the perceptions and practices of child protection social workers regarding children's participation, with special emphasis on the assessment and investigation phase. Specifically, the study addresses the issue of talking with children in this initial phase of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ninety-four CPWs were examined using both closed- and open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, the study identified some crucial barriers to children's participation in the child protection system in general, and regarding the assessment and investigation phase in particular. Second, a relationship between the perceptions of the CPWs and the implementation of children's right to participate in practice was found. Specifically, the more the workers had negative perceptions of children's participation, the less likely they were to talk to the child in the assessment and investigation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for educating child protection social workers on the importance of child participation in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade, children's right to participation in the child protection system has received considerable professional and researcher attention. Child protection workers (CPW) are key in facilitating children's participation in this system. Nevertheless, studies consistently show they find it difficult to implement the right to participation in their practice.

Objectives: The current study examines the perceptions and practices of child protection social workers regarding children's participation, with special emphasis on the assessment and investigation phase. Specifically, the study addresses the issue of talking with children in this initial phase of the intervention.

Method: Ninety-four CPWs were examined using both closed- and open-ended questions.

Results: First, the study identified some crucial barriers to children's participation in the child protection system in general, and regarding the assessment and investigation phase in particular. Second, a relationship between the perceptions of the CPWs and the implementation of children's right to participate in practice was found. Specifically, the more the workers had negative perceptions of children's participation, the less likely they were to talk to the child in the assessment and investigation phase.

Conclusions: These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for educating child protection social workers on the importance of child participation in practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险还是机遇?儿童保护工作者对儿童参与保护系统的看法。
背景:在过去十年中,儿童参与儿童保护系统的权利受到了专业人士和研究人员的广泛关注。儿童保护工作者(CPW)是促进儿童参与该系统的关键。然而,研究一致表明,他们在实践中很难落实儿童的参与权:本研究探讨了儿童保护社会工作者在儿童参与方面的看法和做法,尤其侧重于评估和调查阶段。具体而言,本研究探讨了在干预的初始阶段与儿童交谈的问题:方法:使用封闭式和开放式问题对 94 名儿童保护社工进行了调查:首先,研究发现了儿童参与儿童保护系统的一些关键障碍,特别是在评估和调查阶段。其次,研究发现了儿童保护工作者的看法与在实践中落实儿童参与权之间的关系。具体而言,工作人员对儿童参与的负面看法越多,他们在评估和调查阶段与儿童交谈的可能性就越小:这些研究结果对教育儿童保护社会工作者认识儿童参与实践的重要性的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Risk or opportunity? Child protection workers' perceptions of children's participation in the protection system. Childhood maltreatment associated with adolescent peer networks: Withdrawal, avoidance, and fragmentation The impact of refundable state earned income tax credits on foster care entry rate trends Parents differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An investigation of the relationship between socioeconomic status, social support, and child maltreatment risks Abusive head trauma: Annual medical costs for inpatient care of children managed at a single tertiary care centre in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1