Hyeonhu Park, Ian Garrick-Bethell, Brandon C. Johnson, Ho Jin
{"title":"Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters","authors":"Hyeonhu Park, Ian Garrick-Bethell, Brandon C. Johnson, Ho Jin","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper-seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre-existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole-Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"129 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper-seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre-existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole-Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.