Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1029/2024JE008420
Hyeonhu Park, Ian Garrick-Bethell, Brandon C. Johnson, Ho Jin
{"title":"Evidence for Magnetized Basin Ejecta on the Moon From Observations and Modeling of Demagnetized Craters","authors":"Hyeonhu Park,&nbsp;Ian Garrick-Bethell,&nbsp;Brandon C. Johnson,&nbsp;Ho Jin","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper-seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre-existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole-Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"129 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The formation of lunar crustal magnetic anomalies is not well understood, and most anomalies are not associated with any obvious geologic features. To investigate further, we studied lunar craters from 100 to 400 km in diameter (totaling 305 craters) that may have demagnetized the crust. We find that the four craters Chaplygin, Keeler, Gauss, and Fermi are highly likely to have demagnetized the crust, based on our statistical methods. We modeled the magnetic source of these craters as a simple hole in a thin magnetized plate, representing the destruction of a surficial magnetized layer (Hypothesis 1). Alternatively, we also simulated the impact demagnetization of deeper-seated magnetism in the crust by shock and temperature (Hypothesis 2). Some interior magnetization remains unexplained under both hypotheses, but the destruction of a pre-existing surficial layer of magnetized material is consistent with the location of the peak in each crater's magnetic field. We also find three of the craters are inversely correlated with remotely sensed iron, further supporting our interpretation that the craters demagnetized a surficial layer. The four craters are located on magnetized ejecta deposits from the South Pole-Aitken, Orientale, and Crisium basins. Hence, these four craters further support the hypothesis that large provinces of magnetized material on the Moon arise from hot impact ejecta that cooled in a dynamo field.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从对消磁陨石坑的观测和建模得出月球磁化盆地喷出物的证据
人们对月壳磁异常的形成还不甚了解,大多数异常与任何明显的地质特征都没有关联。为了进一步研究,我们研究了可能使地壳消磁的直径从 100 到 400 千米的月球环形山(共 305 个环形山)。根据我们的统计方法,我们发现查普利金、基勒、高斯和费米这四个环形山极有可能使地壳消磁。我们将这些陨石坑的磁源模拟为磁化薄板上的一个简单孔洞,代表表层磁化层的破坏(假设 1)。另外,我们还模拟了冲击和温度对地壳深层磁性的消磁作用(假设 2)。在这两种假设下,一些内部磁化仍然无法解释,但原有表层磁化物质的破坏与每个陨石坑磁场峰值的位置是一致的。我们还发现其中三个陨石坑与遥感铁成反比,这进一步支持了我们的解释,即陨石坑消磁了表层。这四个陨石坑位于南极-Aitken、Orientale 和 Crisium 盆地的磁化喷出沉积物上。因此,这四个陨石坑进一步支持了这样的假设,即月球上大量的磁化物质来自于在动力场中冷却的热撞击喷出物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
期刊最新文献
Diurnal and Seasonal Variations of Gravity Waves in the Lower Atmosphere of Mars as Observed by InSight Issue Information Impact Gardening Affects the Composition of Chang'e-5 Lunar Soils Spatiotemporal Variability of Saturn's Zonal Winds Observed by Cassini Shallow Water Ice Detection From SHARAD Data in Central Utopia Planitia, Mars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1