{"title":"A Case Study of an Energy Barrier in Li-Ion Battery Cathode Material Using DFT and Post-HF Approaches.","authors":"Laura Bonometti, Denis Usvyat, Lorenzo Maschio","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the ever-increasing interest toward energy storage materials, an accurate understanding of the underlying physicochemical processes becomes mandatory for enabling accurate and predictive simulations. In this study, we apply multilevel quantum chemical calculations on a benchmark material commonly adopted as a cathode in Lithium batteries, Li<sub>0.5</sub>Co<sub>0.5</sub><sup>+3</sup>Ni<sub>0.5</sub><sup>+4</sup>O<sub>2</sub>. We estimate the Lithium hopping barrier, a key quantity for the estimate of Li diffusion coefficient, at different levels: Hartree-Fock (HF), density functional theory (DFT), periodic local Møller-Plesset perturbation theory of second order, complemented with a coupled cluster correction evaluated using an embedded-fragment approach. The post-HF methods were used here not only for benchmarking the key quantities themselves but also for assessing the accuracy of different functionals and probing the influence of the long-range and static correlation. For the given system and quantity in question, we observe that obtained results do not significantly vary across different DFT functionals or post-HF methods, which is rather uncommon. Such an agreement between the employed methods suggests that static correlation, even if prominent in this system, cancels out in the studied energy differences. In fact, the values of the T1 diagnostics, which test the reliability of the single-reference description, do vary from one fragment to another. But for certain fragments they are fairly small and of similar magnitude, indicating the applicability of such fragments for the correction. Our best estimate of the reaction barrier is about 0.85 eV.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"10114-10119"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the ever-increasing interest toward energy storage materials, an accurate understanding of the underlying physicochemical processes becomes mandatory for enabling accurate and predictive simulations. In this study, we apply multilevel quantum chemical calculations on a benchmark material commonly adopted as a cathode in Lithium batteries, Li0.5Co0.5+3Ni0.5+4O2. We estimate the Lithium hopping barrier, a key quantity for the estimate of Li diffusion coefficient, at different levels: Hartree-Fock (HF), density functional theory (DFT), periodic local Møller-Plesset perturbation theory of second order, complemented with a coupled cluster correction evaluated using an embedded-fragment approach. The post-HF methods were used here not only for benchmarking the key quantities themselves but also for assessing the accuracy of different functionals and probing the influence of the long-range and static correlation. For the given system and quantity in question, we observe that obtained results do not significantly vary across different DFT functionals or post-HF methods, which is rather uncommon. Such an agreement between the employed methods suggests that static correlation, even if prominent in this system, cancels out in the studied energy differences. In fact, the values of the T1 diagnostics, which test the reliability of the single-reference description, do vary from one fragment to another. But for certain fragments they are fairly small and of similar magnitude, indicating the applicability of such fragments for the correction. Our best estimate of the reaction barrier is about 0.85 eV.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.