Kai Li, Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Long Zhao, Tienan Ju, Jinlong Zhang
{"title":"Advancing source apportionment of soil potentially toxic elements using a hybrid model: a case study in urban parks, Beijing, China.","authors":"Kai Li, Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Long Zhao, Tienan Ju, Jinlong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02273-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the source-specific health risks of potentially toxic elements (PTE) in urban park soils is essential for human health protection. However, previous studies have mostly focused on the deterministic source-specific health risks, ignoring the health risk assessment from a probabilistic perspective. To fill this gap, we developed a hybrid model that incorporated machine learning (ML) interpretability into positive matrix factorization (PMF) and probability health risk assessment (PHRA) based on the Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that concentrations of soil PTEs except for Mn and Sb were significantly higher than their corresponding background values. Random forest (RF) was regarded as the best ML model to identify key drivers for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, with R<sup>2</sup> > 0.60, but was less effective for other soil PTEs (R<sup>2</sup> < 0.49). Specifically, the contributions of the four potential pollution sources were mixed sources, traffic emission, fuel combustion, and building materials, with contribution rate of 24.88%, 30.56%, 28.99%, and 15.56%, respectively. Fuel combustion contributed the most to non-carcinogenic for children (39.45%), male (43.84%), and female (43.76%), and the non-carcinogenic risk could be considered negligible for human. However, building materials was the major contributor to carcinogenic risk for children (36.1%), male (44.9%), and female (43.2%). The integration of the RF model with PMF and PHRA improved the accuracy of the results by identifying and quantifying the specific sources of each soil PTE using the relative importance analysis from the RF model. The results of this study assisted in providing efficient strategies for risk management and control of soil PTEs in Beijing parks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 12","pages":"501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02273-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying the source-specific health risks of potentially toxic elements (PTE) in urban park soils is essential for human health protection. However, previous studies have mostly focused on the deterministic source-specific health risks, ignoring the health risk assessment from a probabilistic perspective. To fill this gap, we developed a hybrid model that incorporated machine learning (ML) interpretability into positive matrix factorization (PMF) and probability health risk assessment (PHRA) based on the Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that concentrations of soil PTEs except for Mn and Sb were significantly higher than their corresponding background values. Random forest (RF) was regarded as the best ML model to identify key drivers for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, with R2 > 0.60, but was less effective for other soil PTEs (R2 < 0.49). Specifically, the contributions of the four potential pollution sources were mixed sources, traffic emission, fuel combustion, and building materials, with contribution rate of 24.88%, 30.56%, 28.99%, and 15.56%, respectively. Fuel combustion contributed the most to non-carcinogenic for children (39.45%), male (43.84%), and female (43.76%), and the non-carcinogenic risk could be considered negligible for human. However, building materials was the major contributor to carcinogenic risk for children (36.1%), male (44.9%), and female (43.2%). The integration of the RF model with PMF and PHRA improved the accuracy of the results by identifying and quantifying the specific sources of each soil PTE using the relative importance analysis from the RF model. The results of this study assisted in providing efficient strategies for risk management and control of soil PTEs in Beijing parks.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.