A deep learning based method for left ventricular strain measurements: repeatability and accuracy compared to experienced echocardiographers.

Abstract

Background: Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) provides quantification of left ventricular (LV) deformation and is useful in the assessment of LV function. STE is increasingly being used clinically, and every effort to simplify and standardize STE is important. Manual outlining of regions of interest (ROIs) is labor intensive and may influence assessment of strain values.

Purpose: We hypothesized that a deep learning (DL) model, trained on clinical echocardiographic exams, can be combined with a readily available echocardiographic analysis software, to automate strain calculation with comparable fidelity to trained cardiologists.

Methods: Data consisted of still frame echocardiographic images with cardiologist-defined ROIs from 672 clinical echocardiographic exams from a university hospital outpatient clinic. Exams included patients with ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, and conduction abnormalities, and some healthy subjects. An EfficientNetB1-based architecture was employed, and different techniques and properties including data set size, data quality, augmentations, and transfer learning were evaluated. DL predicted ROIs were reintroduced into commercially available echocardiographic analysis software to automatically calculate strain values.

Results: DL-automated strain calculations had an average absolute difference of 0.75 (95% CI 0.58-0.92) for global longitudinal strain (GLS), and 1.16 (95% CI 1.03-1.29) for single-projection longitudinal strain (LS), compared to operators. A Bland-Altman plot revealed no obvious bias, though there were fewer outliers in the lower average LS ranges. Techniques and data properties yielded no significant increase/decrease in performance.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that DL-assisted, automated strain measurements are feasible, and provide results within interobserver variation. Employing DL in echocardiographic analyses could further facilitate adoption of STE parameters in clinical practice and research, and improve reproducibility.