Unsupervised clustering analysis-based characterization of spatial profiles of inaccuracy in apparent diffusion coefficient values with varying acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction - a large multicenter phantom study.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ad9156
Luca Fedeli, Matteo Benelli, Simone Busoni, Giacomo Belli, Antonio Ciccarone, Angela Coniglio, Marco Esposito, Luca Nocetti, Roberto Sghedoni, Roberto Tarducci, Luisa Altabella, Eleonora Belligotti, Silvia Bettarini, Margherita Betti, Rocchina Caivano, Marco Carnì, Andrea Chiappiniello, Sara Cimolai, Fabiola Cretti, Giacomo Feliciani, Christian Fulcheri, Chiara Gasperi, Mara Giacometti, Fabrizio Levrero, Domenico Lizio, Marta Maieron, Simona Marzi, Lorella Mascaro, Silvia Mazzocchi, Gabriele Meliadò, Sabrina Morzenti, Alessandra Niespolo, Linhsia Noferini, Nadia Oberhofer, Laura Orsingher, Mariagrazia Quattrocchi, Alessandra Ricci, Alessandro Savini, Adriana Taddeucci, Claudia Testa, Paolo Tortoli, Gianni Gobbi, Cesare Gori, Luca Bernardi, Marco Giannelli, Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni
{"title":"Unsupervised clustering analysis-based characterization of spatial profiles of inaccuracy in apparent diffusion coefficient values with varying acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction - a large multicenter phantom study.","authors":"Luca Fedeli, Matteo Benelli, Simone Busoni, Giacomo Belli, Antonio Ciccarone, Angela Coniglio, Marco Esposito, Luca Nocetti, Roberto Sghedoni, Roberto Tarducci, Luisa Altabella, Eleonora Belligotti, Silvia Bettarini, Margherita Betti, Rocchina Caivano, Marco Carnì, Andrea Chiappiniello, Sara Cimolai, Fabiola Cretti, Giacomo Feliciani, Christian Fulcheri, Chiara Gasperi, Mara Giacometti, Fabrizio Levrero, Domenico Lizio, Marta Maieron, Simona Marzi, Lorella Mascaro, Silvia Mazzocchi, Gabriele Meliadò, Sabrina Morzenti, Alessandra Niespolo, Linhsia Noferini, Nadia Oberhofer, Laura Orsingher, Mariagrazia Quattrocchi, Alessandra Ricci, Alessandro Savini, Adriana Taddeucci, Claudia Testa, Paolo Tortoli, Gianni Gobbi, Cesare Gori, Luca Bernardi, Marco Giannelli, Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad9156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This large multicenter study of 37 magnetic resonance imaging scanners aimed at characterizing, for the first time, spatial profiles of inaccuracy (namely, Δ-profiles) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with varying acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction, using a statistical approach exploiting unsupervised clustering analysis. A diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol (b-value: 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s mm<sup>-2</sup>) with different combinations of acquisition plan orientation (axial/sagittal/coronal) and diffusion weighting gradient direction (anterior-posterior/left-right/feet-head) was acquired on a standard water phantom. For each acquisition setup, Δ-profiles along the 3 main orthogonal directions were characterized by fitting data with a second order polynomial function (<i>ar</i><sup>2</sup><i>+ br + c</i>). Moreover, for each Δ-profile, the maximum minus minimum of the fitting function (<i>δ</i><sub>max</sub>) was calculated. The parameters<i>a</i>,<i>b</i>,<i>c</i>, and<i>δ</i><sub>max</sub>showed some significant variations between scanner systems by different manufacturers or with different static magnetic field strengths, as well as between different acquisition/estimation setups. Unsupervised clustering analysis showed two evident clusters with significantly different values of parameter<i>a</i>(<i>p</i>< 0.0001), which can be grouped by acquisition protocol/Δ-profile direction but not scanner system. The results of ∆-profiles confirm an appreciable inter-scanner variability in ADC measurement and corroborate the importance of guarantying the reliability of ADC estimations in clinical or research studies, considering for each scanner system the specific acquisition sequence in terms of acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This large multicenter study of 37 magnetic resonance imaging scanners aimed at characterizing, for the first time, spatial profiles of inaccuracy (namely, Δ-profiles) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with varying acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction, using a statistical approach exploiting unsupervised clustering analysis. A diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol (b-value: 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s mm-2) with different combinations of acquisition plan orientation (axial/sagittal/coronal) and diffusion weighting gradient direction (anterior-posterior/left-right/feet-head) was acquired on a standard water phantom. For each acquisition setup, Δ-profiles along the 3 main orthogonal directions were characterized by fitting data with a second order polynomial function (ar2+ br + c). Moreover, for each Δ-profile, the maximum minus minimum of the fitting function (δmax) was calculated. The parametersa,b,c, andδmaxshowed some significant variations between scanner systems by different manufacturers or with different static magnetic field strengths, as well as between different acquisition/estimation setups. Unsupervised clustering analysis showed two evident clusters with significantly different values of parametera(p< 0.0001), which can be grouped by acquisition protocol/Δ-profile direction but not scanner system. The results of ∆-profiles confirm an appreciable inter-scanner variability in ADC measurement and corroborate the importance of guarantying the reliability of ADC estimations in clinical or research studies, considering for each scanner system the specific acquisition sequence in terms of acquisition plan orientation and diffusion weighting gradient direction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于无监督聚类分析的表观扩散系数值不准确性空间分布特征描述--一项大型多中心模型研究。
这项由 37 台磁共振成像扫描仪组成的大型多中心研究旨在利用无监督聚类分析的统计方法,首次描述在不同采集平面方向和扩散加权梯度方向下表观扩散系数(ADC)值不准确的空间分布(即 Δ-分布)。 在标准水模型上采集了不同采集平面方向(轴向/矢状/冠状)和扩散加权梯度方向(前-后/左-右/脚-头)组合的扩散加权成像(DWI)方案(b 值:0-200-400-600-800-1000 s/mm2)。对于每种采集设置,通过用二阶多项式函数(ar2+br+c)拟合数据,确定了沿 3 个主要正交方向的 Δ-剖面特征。此外,对于每个Δ剖面,还计算了拟合函数的最大值减去最小值(δmax)。参数a、b、c和δmax在不同制造商的扫描仪系统或不同静态磁场强度的扫描仪系统之间,以及不同采集/估计设置之间,都显示出一些显著的差异。无监督聚类分析显示,有两个明显的聚类,参数 a 的值有显著差异(p< 0.0001),可按采集方案/Δ-剖面方向而非扫描仪系统分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Biological cell response to electric field: a review of equivalent circuit models and future challenges. A novel hollow-core antiresonant fiber-based biosensor for blood component detection in the THz regime. Simulations of the potential for diffraction enhanced imaging at 8 kev using polycapillary optics. Determining event-related desynchronization onset latency of foot dorsiflexion in people with multiple sclerosis using the cluster depth tests. Automated detection of traumatic bleeding in CT images using 3D U-Net# and multi-organ segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1