Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-03-21 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2425737
Berno U H Overbeek, Willemijn S van Erp, Henk J Eilander, Raymond T C M Koopmans, Jan C M Lavrijsen
{"title":"Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state.","authors":"Berno U H Overbeek, Willemijn S van Erp, Henk J Eilander, Raymond T C M Koopmans, Jan C M Lavrijsen","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2425737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical complications occur frequently in MCS and influence advance medical decision-making. This study aimed to report on medical complications and advance medical decision-making in a nationwide group of MCS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this descriptive cross-sectional study, clinical and advance medical decision-making characteristics were collected in a survey, completed by the treating physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCS population consisted of 32 patients: 65.6% traumatic etiology, 68.8% male. Patients had a median of five complications: hypertonia/spasticity (81.3%) and pneumonia (50.0%) occurred most frequently. Most patients had curative goals: three patients had a fully curative treatment scenarios, 29 a curative scenario with ≥ 1 treatment restrictions, two a palliative and two a symptomatic scenario. Conversations about advance medical decision-making were complicated by disputes with next of kin, inability to evaluate medical treatment because of medical instability, next of kin not being ready to discuss medical treatment, or a treatment scenario explicitly based on requests of next of kin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical complications are common in MCS patients and advance medical decision making was complicated. This legitimates realization of specialized care across acute, post-acute and long-term care. Further longitudinal research into advance medical decision-making is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2425737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medical complications occur frequently in MCS and influence advance medical decision-making. This study aimed to report on medical complications and advance medical decision-making in a nationwide group of MCS patients.

Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, clinical and advance medical decision-making characteristics were collected in a survey, completed by the treating physician.

Results: The MCS population consisted of 32 patients: 65.6% traumatic etiology, 68.8% male. Patients had a median of five complications: hypertonia/spasticity (81.3%) and pneumonia (50.0%) occurred most frequently. Most patients had curative goals: three patients had a fully curative treatment scenarios, 29 a curative scenario with ≥ 1 treatment restrictions, two a palliative and two a symptomatic scenario. Conversations about advance medical decision-making were complicated by disputes with next of kin, inability to evaluate medical treatment because of medical instability, next of kin not being ready to discuss medical treatment, or a treatment scenario explicitly based on requests of next of kin.

Conclusion: Medical complications are common in MCS patients and advance medical decision making was complicated. This legitimates realization of specialized care across acute, post-acute and long-term care. Further longitudinal research into advance medical decision-making is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微意识状态下的医疗并发症和预先医疗决策。
目的:医疗并发症经常出现在 MCS 中,并影响预先医疗决策。本研究旨在报告全国范围内一组 MCS 患者的医疗并发症和预先医疗决策情况:在这项描述性横断面研究中,由主治医生填写调查问卷,收集临床和预先医疗决策特征:结果:MCS 群体由 32 名患者组成:结果:MCS 患者共 32 人:65.6% 为创伤性病因,68.8% 为男性。患者并发症的中位数为五种:高张力/痉挛(81.3%)和肺炎(50.0%)最为常见。大多数患者的目标是治愈:3 名患者的治疗方案是完全治愈,29 名患者的治疗方案是治愈,但治疗限制≥ 1 项,2 名患者的治疗方案是缓解,2 名患者的治疗方案是对症。与近亲发生争执、因病情不稳定而无法评估治疗方案、近亲尚未准备好讨论治疗方案或治疗方案明确基于近亲的要求,这些都使有关预先医疗决策的对话变得复杂:结论:医疗并发症在慢性病患者中很常见,预先医疗决策也很复杂。这就需要在急性期、急性期后和长期护理中实现专业护理。建议对预先医疗决策进行进一步的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state. Responding to the ongoing pandemic-related challenges of individuals with brain injury through the perspective of community-service in Canada: A qualitative study. Understanding 'quality' in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study. Understanding factors influencing exercise program adherence for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Dodecafluoropentane improves neuro-behavioral outcomes and return of spontaneous circulation rate in a swine model of cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1