Sabrena F Noria, Keeley J Pratt, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Kayla Diaz, Bayan Shalash, Daniel Abul-Khoudoud, Bradley Needleman, Maximiliano Magallanes
{"title":"The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on completing bariatric surgery at a single academic institution.","authors":"Sabrena F Noria, Keeley J Pratt, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Kayla Diaz, Bayan Shalash, Daniel Abul-Khoudoud, Bradley Needleman, Maximiliano Magallanes","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11364-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underutilization of bariatric surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to understand the association of SDOH on not achieving surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1081 applications for primary MBS from January-December 2021 were stratified into those that completed surgery (COM; n = 415), in progress > 1-year (IP; n = 107), dropped out (DO; n = 379), and never started (NS; n = 180). Using the American-Community-Survey results (2015-2020) and patient zip-codes, population differences in 4-domains of SDOH (demographic/social/housing/economic) were examined between COM versus the other groups. Additionally, using institutional MBSAQIP and EMR data, patient-specific differences in comorbidities were evaluated for COM versus IP/DO. Univariate analysis using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests were used for continuous and/or categorical variables. For patient-level analysis multinomial logistic regression was used to determine predictors of not achieving surgery. Hypothesis testing was conducted at an overall 5 percent type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05) and Bonferroni's method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to COM, IP-patients resided in zip-codes characterized by fewer married people (43% vs 46%; p = 0.019), lower education levels (49% vs 43%; p = 0.048), more households where rent was > 50% of household income (10% vs 8%, p = 0.002), and households below the poverty line (17.6% vs 14.5%, p = 0.017). At the patient-level, IP were more likely to be male (27.9% vs 14.9%; p = 0.014), publicly insured (44.9% vs 28.4%; p = 0.004), Black (35.5% vs 22.2%; p = 0.006), an active smoker (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.018), have a higher BMI (49.6 vs 47.6; p = 0.01), and coronary intervention (5.8% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Comparison of COM vs DO was similar for both phases. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression demonstrated higher BMI (OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05, p = 0.001), males (OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32, p = 0.024), smoking (OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02, p = 0.002), and Medicaid (OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49, p = 0.002) independently predicted not achieving surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-level data demonstrated social not clinical factors predicted surgery completion. Given zip-codes characterizing the IP/DO groups had a greater prevalence of social risk, more attention needs to be directed patient-level social risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11364-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Underutilization of bariatric surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to understand the association of SDOH on not achieving surgery.
Methods: 1081 applications for primary MBS from January-December 2021 were stratified into those that completed surgery (COM; n = 415), in progress > 1-year (IP; n = 107), dropped out (DO; n = 379), and never started (NS; n = 180). Using the American-Community-Survey results (2015-2020) and patient zip-codes, population differences in 4-domains of SDOH (demographic/social/housing/economic) were examined between COM versus the other groups. Additionally, using institutional MBSAQIP and EMR data, patient-specific differences in comorbidities were evaluated for COM versus IP/DO. Univariate analysis using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests were used for continuous and/or categorical variables. For patient-level analysis multinomial logistic regression was used to determine predictors of not achieving surgery. Hypothesis testing was conducted at an overall 5 percent type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05) and Bonferroni's method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.
Results: Compared to COM, IP-patients resided in zip-codes characterized by fewer married people (43% vs 46%; p = 0.019), lower education levels (49% vs 43%; p = 0.048), more households where rent was > 50% of household income (10% vs 8%, p = 0.002), and households below the poverty line (17.6% vs 14.5%, p = 0.017). At the patient-level, IP were more likely to be male (27.9% vs 14.9%; p = 0.014), publicly insured (44.9% vs 28.4%; p = 0.004), Black (35.5% vs 22.2%; p = 0.006), an active smoker (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.018), have a higher BMI (49.6 vs 47.6; p = 0.01), and coronary intervention (5.8% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Comparison of COM vs DO was similar for both phases. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression demonstrated higher BMI (OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05, p = 0.001), males (OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32, p = 0.024), smoking (OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02, p = 0.002), and Medicaid (OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49, p = 0.002) independently predicted not achieving surgery.
Conclusion: Patient-level data demonstrated social not clinical factors predicted surgery completion. Given zip-codes characterizing the IP/DO groups had a greater prevalence of social risk, more attention needs to be directed patient-level social risks.
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery