Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Keting Jiang, Hao Chen, Jie Wang, Songsheng Zhou, Kaijie Qiu, Haibiao Wang
{"title":"Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula.","authors":"Keting Jiang, Hao Chen, Jie Wang, Songsheng Zhou, Kaijie Qiu, Haibiao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11386-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 63 patients who underwent LDP between March 2017 and April 2024 at the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University. Patients were divided into two groups based on the pancreatic remnant management method: the experimental group (n = 28) underwent pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage, while the control group (n = 35) had the pancreatic remnant closed using a stapler followed by hand-sewn reinforcement. The parameters observed included general patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative data. We compared and analyzed all the above data between the two groups of patients both before and after propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 63 patients were successfully operated. Before PSM, the incidence of POPF (Grade B/C) in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (14.3% vs 34.3%, P < 0.05). And the incidence of POPF (BL) in the experimental group was lower than in the control group (39.3% vs 51.4%). After PSM, the difference in the incidence of POPF (Grade B/C) between the two groups remained statistically significant (16.0% vs 32.0%, P < 0.05). The incidence of POPF (BL) in the experimental group was also lower than in the control group (36.0% vs 56.0%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, pancreatic texture, thickness of pancreatic stump, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative transfusion, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, abdominal infection, encapsulated effusion, or delayed gastric emptying both before and after PSM (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the modified pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage in LDP effectively reduces the incidence of POPF and is both safe and feasible, making it a technique worth promoting.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11386-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage technique in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP).

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 63 patients who underwent LDP between March 2017 and April 2024 at the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, The Affiliated LiHuiLi Hospital of Ningbo University. Patients were divided into two groups based on the pancreatic remnant management method: the experimental group (n = 28) underwent pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage, while the control group (n = 35) had the pancreatic remnant closed using a stapler followed by hand-sewn reinforcement. The parameters observed included general patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative data. We compared and analyzed all the above data between the two groups of patients both before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: All 63 patients were successfully operated. Before PSM, the incidence of POPF (Grade B/C) in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (14.3% vs 34.3%, P < 0.05). And the incidence of POPF (BL) in the experimental group was lower than in the control group (39.3% vs 51.4%). After PSM, the difference in the incidence of POPF (Grade B/C) between the two groups remained statistically significant (16.0% vs 32.0%, P < 0.05). The incidence of POPF (BL) in the experimental group was also lower than in the control group (36.0% vs 56.0%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, pancreatic texture, thickness of pancreatic stump, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative transfusion, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, abdominal infection, encapsulated effusion, or delayed gastric emptying both before and after PSM (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of the modified pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage in LDP effectively reduces the incidence of POPF and is both safe and feasible, making it a technique worth promoting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术伴胰腺残余-胃覆盖:减少术后胰瘘的改良技术。
背景:评估腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术(LDP)中改良的胰腺残端-胃覆盖技术的有效性和安全性:评估腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)中改良的胰腺残端-胃覆盖技术的有效性和安全性:这项回顾性研究分析了 2017 年 3 月至 2024 年 4 月期间在宁波大学附属李惠利医院肝胆胰外科接受 LDP 的 63 例患者的临床数据。根据胰腺残余物处理方法将患者分为两组:实验组(n = 28)进行胰腺残余物-胃覆盖,对照组(n = 35)使用订书机缝合胰腺残余物,然后手工缝合加固。观察参数包括患者一般特征、术中数据和术后数据。我们对两组患者在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的所有上述数据进行了比较和分析:结果:63 名患者均成功实施了手术。结果:63 名患者均成功接受了手术。在倾向评分匹配前,实验组 POPF(B/C 级)的发生率明显低于对照组(14.3% vs 34.3%,P 0.05):结论:在 LDP 中使用改良胰腺残胃覆盖可有效降低 POPF 的发生率,而且安全可行,是一项值得推广的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review. Comparison between robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy and open Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia. Inflammation-attenuating effect of carbon dioxide versus room-air environment in a rat laparotomy model. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1