Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review.

Gian Eugenio Tontini, Alessandro Rimondi, Tommaso Pessarelli, Giorgio Ciprandi, Hayato Kurihara, Andrea Sorge, Maurizio Vecchi
{"title":"Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Gian Eugenio Tontini, Alessandro Rimondi, Tommaso Pessarelli, Giorgio Ciprandi, Hayato Kurihara, Andrea Sorge, Maurizio Vecchi","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11370-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Colorectal gas explosion (CGE) is an exceptional but potentially fatal complication of digestive endoscopy or surgery. The role played by bowel preparations and endoscopic or surgical devices in the risk of CGE is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors for CGE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from inception to September 16, 2024 including all reports of CGE according to a systematic review protocol preregistered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023455049). Additionally, we analyzed all trials that measured explosive gas levels after different bowel preparation strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine case reports, three case series, and eleven trials were included. Thirty-six cases of CGE were described, 12 surgical and 24 endoscopic. Perforation and death following CGE occurred in 81% and 14% of patients, respectively. The most common bowel preparations taken before CGE were enemas (42%) and oral preparations (31%), while 28% of patients did not undergo any bowel preparation. Bowel preparation was reported as inadequate in most CGE (solid stool in 65% and poor in 11%). The most frequent devices that triggered CGE were argon plasma coagulation during endoscopy (58%) and the electric scalpel during surgical procedures (75%). Published trials showed that adequate bowel preparation, together with endoscopic insufflation and suction, reduces intestinal levels of hydrogen and methane.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CGE predominantly occurs in patients undergoing interventional procedures with inadequate bowel preparation. Achieving optimal bowel preparation, together with endoscopic aspiration, washing, and CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation practically abolishes potentially explosive gas concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11370-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Colorectal gas explosion (CGE) is an exceptional but potentially fatal complication of digestive endoscopy or surgery. The role played by bowel preparations and endoscopic or surgical devices in the risk of CGE is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors for CGE.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from inception to September 16, 2024 including all reports of CGE according to a systematic review protocol preregistered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023455049). Additionally, we analyzed all trials that measured explosive gas levels after different bowel preparation strategies.

Results: Twenty-nine case reports, three case series, and eleven trials were included. Thirty-six cases of CGE were described, 12 surgical and 24 endoscopic. Perforation and death following CGE occurred in 81% and 14% of patients, respectively. The most common bowel preparations taken before CGE were enemas (42%) and oral preparations (31%), while 28% of patients did not undergo any bowel preparation. Bowel preparation was reported as inadequate in most CGE (solid stool in 65% and poor in 11%). The most frequent devices that triggered CGE were argon plasma coagulation during endoscopy (58%) and the electric scalpel during surgical procedures (75%). Published trials showed that adequate bowel preparation, together with endoscopic insufflation and suction, reduces intestinal levels of hydrogen and methane.

Conclusions: CGE predominantly occurs in patients undergoing interventional procedures with inadequate bowel preparation. Achieving optimal bowel preparation, together with endoscopic aspiration, washing, and CO2 insufflation practically abolishes potentially explosive gas concentrations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消化内镜检查和手术过程中大肠气体爆炸的临床特征和风险因素:系统性综述。
背景和目的:结肠直肠气爆(CGE)是消化内镜检查或手术的一种特殊但可能致命的并发症。肠道准备工作、内镜或手术器械在 CGE 风险中所起的作用尚不清楚。我们对文献进行了系统性回顾,以确定 CGE 的风险因素:我们对从开始到 2024 年 9 月 16 日的多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,包括根据 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42023455049)中预先注册的系统性综述方案进行的所有有关 CGE 的报道。此外,我们还分析了所有测量不同肠道准备策略后爆炸性气体水平的试验:结果:共纳入 29 份病例报告、3 个病例系列和 11 项试验。共描述了 36 例 CGE,其中 12 例为外科手术,24 例为内窥镜手术。分别有 81% 和 14% 的患者在 CGE 术后发生穿孔和死亡。CGE 前最常见的肠道准备是灌肠(42%)和口服制剂(31%),28% 的患者没有进行任何肠道准备。据报告,大多数 CGE 的肠道准备都不充分(65% 的患者排出固体粪便,11% 的患者排便不畅)。引发 CGE 的最常见设备是内窥镜检查中的氩等离子凝固(58%)和外科手术中的电刀(75%)。已发表的试验表明,充分的肠道准备以及内窥镜充气和抽吸可降低肠道中的氢气和甲烷水平:结论:CGE 主要发生在肠道准备不足的介入手术患者身上。实现最佳的肠道准备,再加上内窥镜抽吸、清洗和二氧化碳充气,可有效消除潜在的爆炸性气体浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review. Comparison between robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy and open Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia. Inflammation-attenuating effect of carbon dioxide versus room-air environment in a rat laparotomy model. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1