Upcoming multi-visceral robotic surgery systems: a SAGES review.

Ankit Sarin, Sarah Samreen, Jennifer M Moffett, Edmundo Inga-Zapata, Francesco Bianco, Nawar A Alkhamesi, Jacob D Owen, Niti Shahi, Jonathan C DeLong, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Christopher M Schlachta, Patricia Sylla, Dan E Azagury
{"title":"Upcoming multi-visceral robotic surgery systems: a SAGES review.","authors":"Ankit Sarin, Sarah Samreen, Jennifer M Moffett, Edmundo Inga-Zapata, Francesco Bianco, Nawar A Alkhamesi, Jacob D Owen, Niti Shahi, Jonathan C DeLong, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Christopher M Schlachta, Patricia Sylla, Dan E Azagury","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11384-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic surgical procedures continue to increase both in the United States (US) and worldwide. Several novel robotic surgical platforms are under development or undergoing regulatory approval. This review explores robotic platforms that are expected to reach US consumers within the next 2-3 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAGES Robotic Platforms Working Group identified robotic surgery platforms in various stages of development and selected multi-visceral systems nearing or completing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process. We outline key system components including architecture, unique features, development status, regulatory approval, and expected markets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified twenty robotic platforms that met our selection criteria. Ten companies were based in North America, and ten were based in Europe or Asia. Each system is described in detail and key features are summarized in table form for easy comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The emergence of novel robotic surgical platforms represents an important evolution in the growth of minimally invasive surgery. Increased competition has the potential to bring value to surgical patients by stimulating innovation and driving down cost. The impact of these platforms remains to be determined, but the continued growth of robotic surgery seems to be all but assured.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11384-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgical procedures continue to increase both in the United States (US) and worldwide. Several novel robotic surgical platforms are under development or undergoing regulatory approval. This review explores robotic platforms that are expected to reach US consumers within the next 2-3 years.

Methods: The SAGES Robotic Platforms Working Group identified robotic surgery platforms in various stages of development and selected multi-visceral systems nearing or completing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process. We outline key system components including architecture, unique features, development status, regulatory approval, and expected markets.

Results: We identified twenty robotic platforms that met our selection criteria. Ten companies were based in North America, and ten were based in Europe or Asia. Each system is described in detail and key features are summarized in table form for easy comparison.

Conclusion: The emergence of novel robotic surgical platforms represents an important evolution in the growth of minimally invasive surgery. Increased competition has the potential to bring value to surgical patients by stimulating innovation and driving down cost. The impact of these platforms remains to be determined, but the continued growth of robotic surgery seems to be all but assured.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即将推出的多脏器机器人手术系统:SAGES 综述。
背景:机器人外科手术在美国和全球都在持续增加。一些新型机器人手术平台正在开发中或正在接受监管部门的审批。本综述探讨了预计将在未来 2-3 年内进入美国消费者视野的机器人平台:SAGES 机器人平台工作组确定了处于不同开发阶段的机器人手术平台,并选择了接近或完成美国食品药品管理局 (FDA) 批准程序的多脏器系统。我们概述了系统的关键组成部分,包括架构、独特功能、开发状态、监管审批和预期市场:结果:我们确定了 20 个符合我们选择标准的机器人平台。十家公司位于北美,十家公司位于欧洲或亚洲。我们对每个系统进行了详细描述,并以表格形式总结了主要特点,以便于比较:新型机器人手术平台的出现是微创手术发展过程中的一次重要演变。竞争的加剧有可能通过刺激创新和降低成本为手术患者带来价值。这些平台的影响仍有待确定,但机器人手术的持续增长似乎已是板上钉钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review. Comparison between robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy and open Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia. Inflammation-attenuating effect of carbon dioxide versus room-air environment in a rat laparotomy model. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1