Reflection and self-efficacy for clinical skills

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1111/tct.13833
Jade Lene Yong, Gwyndaf Roberts
{"title":"Reflection and self-efficacy for clinical skills","authors":"Jade Lene Yong,&nbsp;Gwyndaf Roberts","doi":"10.1111/tct.13833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical skills are fundamental to medical school curriculums and typically introduced within the preclinical years. In their experiential learning, students' self-efficacy, or the belief in their ability to succeed, is an important factor in influencing clinical skill mastery. Reflection is thought to affect self-efficacy; however, its exact impacts remain largely unexplored within published literature. This mixed methods study investigated whether preclinical students' engagement with reflection affected self-efficacy for clinical skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred seventy-three of the 289 preclinical medical students who were invited to participate responded to this 2022 study. We used validated questionnaires to measure engagement with reflection and perceived self-efficacy for clinical skills, conducting hierarchical multiple linear regression for analysis. Thirteen students participated in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, which were analysed via thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While statistical analysis showed no significant effects of engaging with reflection on clinical skill self-efficacy, thematic analysis suggested that students perceived the opposite. The themes through which reflection affected self-efficacy were by ‘evaluation of performances’ against expected outcomes, ‘familiarisation and understanding of skills’, by ‘transforming personal mindsets’ and allowing students to ‘connect to their emotions’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests that engaging with reflection can positively or negatively affect self-efficacy for clinical skills, depending on students' attitudes towards reflective practice. Solely engaging with reflection is insufficient to alter self-efficacy beliefs and should be considered alongside personal factors including the individual's mindset and perceived need for reflection. The medical educator's role in facilitating reflection is important, enabling students to reap the benefits of this practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical skills are fundamental to medical school curriculums and typically introduced within the preclinical years. In their experiential learning, students' self-efficacy, or the belief in their ability to succeed, is an important factor in influencing clinical skill mastery. Reflection is thought to affect self-efficacy; however, its exact impacts remain largely unexplored within published literature. This mixed methods study investigated whether preclinical students' engagement with reflection affected self-efficacy for clinical skills.

Methods

Two hundred seventy-three of the 289 preclinical medical students who were invited to participate responded to this 2022 study. We used validated questionnaires to measure engagement with reflection and perceived self-efficacy for clinical skills, conducting hierarchical multiple linear regression for analysis. Thirteen students participated in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, which were analysed via thematic analysis.

Results

While statistical analysis showed no significant effects of engaging with reflection on clinical skill self-efficacy, thematic analysis suggested that students perceived the opposite. The themes through which reflection affected self-efficacy were by ‘evaluation of performances’ against expected outcomes, ‘familiarisation and understanding of skills’, by ‘transforming personal mindsets’ and allowing students to ‘connect to their emotions’.

Conclusion

This study suggests that engaging with reflection can positively or negatively affect self-efficacy for clinical skills, depending on students' attitudes towards reflective practice. Solely engaging with reflection is insufficient to alter self-efficacy beliefs and should be considered alongside personal factors including the individual's mindset and perceived need for reflection. The medical educator's role in facilitating reflection is important, enabling students to reap the benefits of this practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床技能的反思和自我效能。
介绍:临床技能是医学院课程的基础,通常在临床前几年引入。在体验式学习过程中,学生的自我效能感(即相信自己有能力取得成功)是影响临床技能掌握程度的重要因素。反思被认为会影响自我效能感;然而,在已发表的文献中,反思的确切影响在很大程度上仍未得到探讨。这项混合方法研究探讨了临床前学生参与反思是否会影响临床技能的自我效能感:这项研究共邀请了 289 名临床前医科学生参加,其中 273 名学生对研究做出了回应。我们使用经过验证的问卷来测量参与反思和临床技能自我效能感,并进行分层多元线性回归分析。13 名学生参加了半结构式访谈和焦点小组,并通过主题分析对访谈和焦点小组进行了分析:统计分析显示,参与反思对临床技能自我效能感没有明显影响,但主题分析表明,学生的看法恰恰相反。反思对自我效能感产生影响的主题包括:根据预期结果 "评估表现"、"熟悉和理解技能"、"转变个人心态 "以及让学生 "与自己的情感联系起来":本研究表明,参与反思会对临床技能的自我效能产生积极或消极影响,这取决于学生对反思实践的态度。仅仅进行反思不足以改变自我效能感信念,还应该考虑个人因素,包括个人心态和对反思的感知需求。医学教育者在促进反思方面的作用非常重要,可使学生从反思实践中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
How to … Co-design Education With Healthcare Consumers Impacts of the Accreditation Process for Undergraduate Medical Schools: A Scoping Review Stepping Into the Night: The Preparedness of Newly Qualified Doctors for Out-of-Hours Work Engaging Clinical Learners Asynchronously With Social Annotation for Case-Based Discussions Correction to “Oral Presentations”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1