Engaging Clinical Learners Asynchronously With Social Annotation for Case-Based Discussions

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/tct.70032
Dylan T. Adamson, Sandra Kavalukas, M. Ann Shaw, Laura A. Weingartner
{"title":"Engaging Clinical Learners Asynchronously With Social Annotation for Case-Based Discussions","authors":"Dylan T. Adamson,&nbsp;Sandra Kavalukas,&nbsp;M. Ann Shaw,&nbsp;Laura A. Weingartner","doi":"10.1111/tct.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical educators are often challenged to sustain learner engagement beyond the clinical learning environment. A social annotation platform is an instructional tool typically used in bachelor's-level and other nonmedical instructional settings to facilitate asynchronous discussions for reading assignments. This work aimed to promote asynchronous engagement among clinical learners by adapting a social annotation platform for case-based learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>We piloted a social annotation platform in a 4-week surgical residency preparatory course with fourth-year medical students. We designed four longitudinal clinical cases representing common scenarios that surgical interns may encounter. Students discussed each case section asynchronously on the platform by annotating case content and replying to peer discussion comments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>We measured engagement through activity on the platform and collected student perceptions through a postcourse evaluation survey. Nine students completed the residency preparatory course over 4 weeks in 2023. Engagement was high, with 95% of reading assignments completed. On average, students submitted nine discussion comments per assignment (three required) and spent 62 active minutes discussing each case section. Students engaged more overall with nonclinical topics. All students completed the postcourse survey and indicated that the platform was easy to navigate. Students appreciated being able to see peers' line of thinking through the case and reported feeling engaged with other students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implication</h3>\n \n <p>A social annotation platform may offer an effective tool for engaging clinical students asynchronously. This platform can be used in clinical education to provide instructional flexibility for faculty while helping students feel engaged with their peers and clinical curriculum.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical educators are often challenged to sustain learner engagement beyond the clinical learning environment. A social annotation platform is an instructional tool typically used in bachelor's-level and other nonmedical instructional settings to facilitate asynchronous discussions for reading assignments. This work aimed to promote asynchronous engagement among clinical learners by adapting a social annotation platform for case-based learning.

Approach

We piloted a social annotation platform in a 4-week surgical residency preparatory course with fourth-year medical students. We designed four longitudinal clinical cases representing common scenarios that surgical interns may encounter. Students discussed each case section asynchronously on the platform by annotating case content and replying to peer discussion comments.

Evaluation

We measured engagement through activity on the platform and collected student perceptions through a postcourse evaluation survey. Nine students completed the residency preparatory course over 4 weeks in 2023. Engagement was high, with 95% of reading assignments completed. On average, students submitted nine discussion comments per assignment (three required) and spent 62 active minutes discussing each case section. Students engaged more overall with nonclinical topics. All students completed the postcourse survey and indicated that the platform was easy to navigate. Students appreciated being able to see peers' line of thinking through the case and reported feeling engaged with other students.

Implication

A social annotation platform may offer an effective tool for engaging clinical students asynchronously. This platform can be used in clinical education to provide instructional flexibility for faculty while helping students feel engaged with their peers and clinical curriculum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与临床学习者异步与社会注释基于案例的讨论
临床教育工作者经常面临的挑战是在临床学习环境之外保持学习者的参与。社交注释平台是一种教学工具,通常用于本科水平和其他非医学教学环境,以促进阅读作业的异步讨论。这项工作旨在通过适应基于案例的学习的社会注释平台来促进临床学习者之间的异步参与。方法:在为期4周的外科住院医师预备课程中,我们在四年级医学生中试用了一个社交注释平台。我们设计了四个纵向临床病例,代表外科实习生可能遇到的常见情况。学生在平台上通过标注案例内容和回复同行讨论评论的方式,异步讨论每个案例部分。我们通过平台上的活动来衡量参与度,并通过课后评估调查收集学生的看法。9名学生在2023年完成了为期4周的住院医师预备课程。学生的参与度很高,95%的阅读作业都完成了。学生们平均每份作业提交九篇讨论评论(必修三篇),并花62分钟讨论每个案例部分。学生更全面地参与非临床主题。所有学生都完成了课后调查,并表示该平台易于导航。学生们很高兴能够通过案例看到同龄人的思路,并报告说感觉与其他学生互动。结论社交注释平台可以为临床学生的异步参与提供有效的工具。该平台可用于临床教育,为教师提供教学灵活性,同时帮助学生感受到与同龄人和临床课程的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Supporting Feedback and Trust in CBME: A Conjoint WBA Workshop for Trainers and Trainees Generative Artificial Intelligence and Risk of Premature Expertise: Why Human Judgement Remains Essential in Medical Education Structure and Utility of e-Portfolios for Reflection and Learning in Healthcare Professional Education: A Narrative Review New Associate Editors, New Article Type, New Voices and New Special Issue Education in the Era of Teleneurology: Development and Evaluation of a Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1