Impacts of the Accreditation Process for Undergraduate Medical Schools: A Scoping Review

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/tct.70031
Leticia C. Girotto, Karynne B. Machado, Roberta F. C. Moreira, Milton A. Martins, Patrícia Z. Tempski
{"title":"Impacts of the Accreditation Process for Undergraduate Medical Schools: A Scoping Review","authors":"Leticia C. Girotto,&nbsp;Karynne B. Machado,&nbsp;Roberta F. C. Moreira,&nbsp;Milton A. Martins,&nbsp;Patrícia Z. Tempski","doi":"10.1111/tct.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study is to identify, synthesize and communicate research findings; identify research gaps; and formulate recommendations for future research regarding the impact of the accreditation process on undergraduate medical schools around the world.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The electronic search was performed up to March 2024 to identify studies that investigated the impact of the accreditation process on undergraduate medical schools. Two independent reviewers performed the selection process and extracted data from the included studies to perform a qualitative analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The search identified 5148 references. After the selection process, 31 studies from 14 countries were included for data extraction. Studies highlighted five main themes: curricular and governance changes, continuous quality improvement, students' performance, school recognition and student satisfaction, and accreditation data sharing proposal. Three studies presented negative points related to accreditation process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The accreditation process induced both positive impacts and negative burdens for undergraduate medical schools. Continuous quality improvement is a common element identified by studies to help stakeholders ensure that accreditation improves the quality of medical education and, consequently, the health care provided. Experiences with accreditation should be shared and reported to improve the quality of medical education worldwide. Future studies must be carried out with a clear description of the domains and criteria considered during the accreditation process as well as the outcome measures used.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to identify, synthesize and communicate research findings; identify research gaps; and formulate recommendations for future research regarding the impact of the accreditation process on undergraduate medical schools around the world.

Method

This scoping review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The electronic search was performed up to March 2024 to identify studies that investigated the impact of the accreditation process on undergraduate medical schools. Two independent reviewers performed the selection process and extracted data from the included studies to perform a qualitative analysis.

Results

The search identified 5148 references. After the selection process, 31 studies from 14 countries were included for data extraction. Studies highlighted five main themes: curricular and governance changes, continuous quality improvement, students' performance, school recognition and student satisfaction, and accreditation data sharing proposal. Three studies presented negative points related to accreditation process.

Conclusion

The accreditation process induced both positive impacts and negative burdens for undergraduate medical schools. Continuous quality improvement is a common element identified by studies to help stakeholders ensure that accreditation improves the quality of medical education and, consequently, the health care provided. Experiences with accreditation should be shared and reported to improve the quality of medical education worldwide. Future studies must be carried out with a clear description of the domains and criteria considered during the accreditation process as well as the outcome measures used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科医学院认证过程的影响:范围审查
本研究的目的是识别、综合和交流研究成果;确定研究差距;并就认证过程对世界各地本科医学院的影响为未来的研究提出建议。方法本综述遵循系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析-扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)的建议。电子检索一直进行到2024年3月,以确定调查认证程序对本科医学院影响的研究。两名独立的审稿人进行了选择过程,并从纳入的研究中提取数据进行定性分析。结果共检索到文献5148篇。在选择过程中,来自14个国家的31项研究被纳入数据提取。研究强调了五个主要主题:课程和治理变化、持续质量改进、学生表现、学校认可和学生满意度,以及认证数据共享建议。三项研究提出了与认证程序有关的负面观点。结论认证过程对医学本科院校既有正面影响,也有负面负担。持续改进质量是研究确定的一个共同因素,以帮助利益攸关方确保认证提高医学教育的质量,从而提高所提供的保健服务的质量。应分享和报告认证方面的经验,以提高全世界医学教育的质量。未来的研究必须对认证过程中所考虑的领域和标准以及所使用的结果衡量标准进行清晰的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Supporting Feedback and Trust in CBME: A Conjoint WBA Workshop for Trainers and Trainees Generative Artificial Intelligence and Risk of Premature Expertise: Why Human Judgement Remains Essential in Medical Education Structure and Utility of e-Portfolios for Reflection and Learning in Healthcare Professional Education: A Narrative Review New Associate Editors, New Article Type, New Voices and New Special Issue Education in the Era of Teleneurology: Development and Evaluation of a Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1