Spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from bark beetle outbreaks vary within and among bark beetle-host tree associations in the western United States

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122382
Robert A. Andrus , Jeffrey A. Hicke , Arjan J.H. Meddens
{"title":"Spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from bark beetle outbreaks vary within and among bark beetle-host tree associations in the western United States","authors":"Robert A. Andrus ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Hicke ,&nbsp;Arjan J.H. Meddens","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Eruptive outbreaks of bark beetles have caused extensive and often severe tree mortality across tens of thousands to millions of hectares in temperate forests since the late 1990s. Many individual bark beetle-host tree (BB-host) associations have experienced outbreaks in recent decades, and associations may exhibit unique spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality. We investigated the spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from the nine most damaging BB-host associations in the western US. We first extended a dataset of gridded mortality area (MA; annual area of killed trees within a 1-km grid cell) from aerial surveys to 1997–2023. Total MA was highest for the mountain pine beetle (<em>Dendroctonus ponderosae</em>)-lodgepole pine (<em>Pinus contorta</em>) association. We delineated the spatial extent and period of 49 outbreaks (4–7 per BB-host association). Multiple characteristics of tree mortality were compared within and among BB-host associations at two spatial scales: (1) the outbreak scale (all grid cells aggregated) and (2) stand scale (individual grid cells). Our results highlight notable differences in maximum annual and cumulative MA, duration of mortality, and the average rate of MA among associations, with considerable variability among outbreaks within some associations. Associations exhibited all combinations of shorter to longer duration and lower to higher severity (cumulative MA) and results were similar at the stand and outbreak scale. Pinyon ips (<em>Ips confusus</em>) outbreaks in pinyon pine forests were the shortest duration and higher severity, resulting in significantly more rapid rates of MA than other associations at both spatial scales. Outbreaks of western balsam bark beetle (<em>Dryocoetes confusus</em>) in subalpine fir (<em>Abies lasiocarpa</em>) and Douglas-fir beetle (<em>Dendroctonus pseudotsugae</em>) in Douglas-fir (<em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em>) produced very low MA rates due to low cumulative MA and longer or shorter outbreaks, respectively. Outbreaks resulted in &gt;75 % forest MA (cumulative MA divided by forest cover) from bark beetles across 19,892 km<sup>2</sup> of forest, with the amount and percent of forest loss varying by BB-host association. Although subject to some uncertainty, our analysis of aerial surveys incorporates large areas and multiple decades, thereby providing results complementary to field studies that are limited in spatial and/or temporal extent. By synthesizing the spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from outbreaks by BB-host associations, our results inform land managers’ understanding of impacts of past outbreaks and the potential outcomes from future outbreaks for forests during a period of rapid changes to forest structure and composition from bark beetles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"576 ","pages":"Article 122382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724006947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eruptive outbreaks of bark beetles have caused extensive and often severe tree mortality across tens of thousands to millions of hectares in temperate forests since the late 1990s. Many individual bark beetle-host tree (BB-host) associations have experienced outbreaks in recent decades, and associations may exhibit unique spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality. We investigated the spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from the nine most damaging BB-host associations in the western US. We first extended a dataset of gridded mortality area (MA; annual area of killed trees within a 1-km grid cell) from aerial surveys to 1997–2023. Total MA was highest for the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae)-lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) association. We delineated the spatial extent and period of 49 outbreaks (4–7 per BB-host association). Multiple characteristics of tree mortality were compared within and among BB-host associations at two spatial scales: (1) the outbreak scale (all grid cells aggregated) and (2) stand scale (individual grid cells). Our results highlight notable differences in maximum annual and cumulative MA, duration of mortality, and the average rate of MA among associations, with considerable variability among outbreaks within some associations. Associations exhibited all combinations of shorter to longer duration and lower to higher severity (cumulative MA) and results were similar at the stand and outbreak scale. Pinyon ips (Ips confusus) outbreaks in pinyon pine forests were the shortest duration and higher severity, resulting in significantly more rapid rates of MA than other associations at both spatial scales. Outbreaks of western balsam bark beetle (Dryocoetes confusus) in subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) and Douglas-fir beetle (Dendroctonus pseudotsugae) in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) produced very low MA rates due to low cumulative MA and longer or shorter outbreaks, respectively. Outbreaks resulted in >75 % forest MA (cumulative MA divided by forest cover) from bark beetles across 19,892 km2 of forest, with the amount and percent of forest loss varying by BB-host association. Although subject to some uncertainty, our analysis of aerial surveys incorporates large areas and multiple decades, thereby providing results complementary to field studies that are limited in spatial and/or temporal extent. By synthesizing the spatiotemporal characteristics of tree mortality from outbreaks by BB-host associations, our results inform land managers’ understanding of impacts of past outbreaks and the potential outcomes from future outbreaks for forests during a period of rapid changes to forest structure and composition from bark beetles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国西部树皮甲虫爆发造成树木死亡的时空特征在树皮甲虫-寄主树木关联内部和之间存在差异
自 20 世纪 90 年代末以来,树皮甲虫的爆发已造成温带森林数万公顷到数百万公顷的树木大面积死亡,而且往往十分严重。近几十年来,许多单独的树皮甲虫-寄主树(BB-寄主)结合体都经历了爆发,这些结合体可能表现出独特的树木死亡时空特征。我们研究了美国西部九个危害最严重的树皮甲虫寄主树群的树木死亡时空特征。我们首先将空中调查的网格化死亡面积(MA;1 公里网格单元内树木的年死亡面积)数据集扩展到 1997-2023 年。山松甲虫(Dendroctonus ponderosae)-道奇松(Pinus contorta)组合的总死亡面积最大。我们划定了 49 次暴发(每次暴发 4-7 次)的空间范围和时间段。在两种空间尺度上比较了BB-寄主关联内部和之间树木死亡的多种特征:(1) 暴发尺度(所有网格单元汇总)和 (2) 林分尺度(单个网格单元)。我们的研究结果表明,在最大年死亡率和累积年死亡率、死亡持续时间以及平均年死亡率方面,不同群落之间存在明显差异,某些群落的爆发之间也存在很大差异。各关联表现出从持续时间较短到较长、严重程度较低到较高(累积 MA)的所有组合,在林分和疫情范围内结果相似。松柏林中的松树梢(Ips confusus)暴发持续时间最短、严重程度较高,导致在两个空间尺度上的 MA 速度明显快于其它关联。在亚高山冷杉(Abies lasiocarpa)中爆发的西部香脂树皮甲虫(Dryocoetes confusus)和在花旗松(Pseudotsuga menziesii)中爆发的花旗松甲虫(Dendroctonus pseudotsugae)分别由于较低的累积 MA 以及较长或较短的爆发而产生了非常低的 MA 率。在19,892平方公里的森林中,树皮甲虫的爆发造成了75%的森林损失(累计损失除以森林覆盖率),森林损失的数量和百分比因树皮甲虫与寄主的关系而异。尽管存在一些不确定性,但我们对航空调查的分析涵盖了大片区域和多个年代,从而提供了与空间和/或时间范围有限的实地研究相辅相成的结果。通过综合树皮甲虫寄主群爆发造成树木死亡的时空特征,我们的研究结果有助于土地管理者了解过去树皮甲虫爆发对森林造成的影响,以及在树皮甲虫对森林结构和组成造成快速变化的时期,未来树皮甲虫爆发可能对森林造成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Modeling European beech defoliation at a regional scale gradient in Germany from northern lowlands to central uplands using geo-ecological parameters, Sentinel-2 and National Forest Condition Survey data Modeling tree radial growth with competition and crown characteristics from an aerial perspective One size does not fit all: Intra– and interspecific variation of den site use in two marsupial glider species in fragmented forest Carbon recovery in secondary forests: Insights from three West African countries Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1