Linking overstory relative density to light availability and understory plant community composition in disturbance-dependent, Pinus rigida -dominated forests of the mid-Atlantic coastal plain, USA
Bernard N. Isaacson , Shawn P. Serbin , Jason C. Grabosky
{"title":"Linking overstory relative density to light availability and understory plant community composition in disturbance-dependent, Pinus rigida -dominated forests of the mid-Atlantic coastal plain, USA","authors":"Bernard N. Isaacson , Shawn P. Serbin , Jason C. Grabosky","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a vigorous debate around whether and how to manage forests for climate mitigation or for other goals such as biodiversity. To achieve any of these goals it is necessary to define the parameters within which they can exist; ideally, the metrics used to evaluate progress towards one goal should be able to speak to other goals, especially when there are competing objectives at play. In the pitch pine (<em>Pinus rigida</em>) dominated coastal plain of New Jersey, open-canopy habitats are the locus of biodiversity, so we sought to define ‘open-canopy’ using a common metric of forest occupancy, Relative Density (RD). Using forest inventory data and light intensity measurements we found non-linear relationships between overstory RD and metrics of canopy light use. We then used RD to define upper limits of forest occupancy for fairly common open-canopy understory taxa above which one is very unlikely to find these plants. Our methods found credible thresholds in overstory density for four of five taxa, placing boundaries on the envelope of survivable conditions for these open-canopy community members. Native warm-season grasses (subfamily <em>Panicoideae</em>), <em>Carex</em>, <em>Quercus ilicifolia,</em> and <em>Q. marilandica</em> were not present in pitch pine forests above RD of roughly 0.57, aligning well with the approximate stocking level for stem exclusion. Separate validation data supported our quantified limits for warm-season grasses and demonstrated the importance of considering ground-layer competition but did not support overstory density thresholds for <em>Hudsonia spp</em>. Managers of similar pine forests with social goals in tension may be better able to quantify or illustrate tradeoffs between objectives using these results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a vigorous debate around whether and how to manage forests for climate mitigation or for other goals such as biodiversity. To achieve any of these goals it is necessary to define the parameters within which they can exist; ideally, the metrics used to evaluate progress towards one goal should be able to speak to other goals, especially when there are competing objectives at play. In the pitch pine (Pinus rigida) dominated coastal plain of New Jersey, open-canopy habitats are the locus of biodiversity, so we sought to define ‘open-canopy’ using a common metric of forest occupancy, Relative Density (RD). Using forest inventory data and light intensity measurements we found non-linear relationships between overstory RD and metrics of canopy light use. We then used RD to define upper limits of forest occupancy for fairly common open-canopy understory taxa above which one is very unlikely to find these plants. Our methods found credible thresholds in overstory density for four of five taxa, placing boundaries on the envelope of survivable conditions for these open-canopy community members. Native warm-season grasses (subfamily Panicoideae), Carex, Quercus ilicifolia, and Q. marilandica were not present in pitch pine forests above RD of roughly 0.57, aligning well with the approximate stocking level for stem exclusion. Separate validation data supported our quantified limits for warm-season grasses and demonstrated the importance of considering ground-layer competition but did not support overstory density thresholds for Hudsonia spp. Managers of similar pine forests with social goals in tension may be better able to quantify or illustrate tradeoffs between objectives using these results.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.