Tree regeneration dynamics under a range of restoration treatments in Northeast pitch pine (Pinus rigida) barrens

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122547
Kathleen A. Stutzman , Anthony W. D’Amato , Kevin J. Dodds
{"title":"Tree regeneration dynamics under a range of restoration treatments in Northeast pitch pine (Pinus rigida) barrens","authors":"Kathleen A. Stutzman ,&nbsp;Anthony W. D’Amato ,&nbsp;Kevin J. Dodds","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire suppression and disconnection from historic fire regimes has a distinct and significant impact on fire-dependent natural communities, including regeneration of characteristic species, whose restoration may be further complicated by climate change. Pitch pine (<em>Pinus rigida</em>) barrens are a globally rare, fire-dependent natural community found primarily in the Northeast United States. We analyzed pitch pine regeneration response across 47 sites treated with 1) harvest (n = 6), 2) fall prescribed fire (n = 9), 3) spring prescribed fire (n = 9), 4) mowing followed by prescribed fire (n = 12), and 5) controls (n = 11), in barrens across the Northeast, to measure the impacts of regionally common restoration treatments on desired regeneration success. Leaf litter depth, mineral soil exposure, overstory basal area and composition, understory plant cover, and tree regeneration in three size classes across these five treatment types were compared. Pitch pine small seedling abundance was adversely impacted by greater litter depth, understory cover, and abundance of shrub oak (<em>Quercus ilicifolia</em> and <em>Quercus prinoides</em>) seedlings. All treatment types had significantly more small seedlings than untreated control units. Large seedling abundance was also negatively associated with increased litter depth. Pitch pine sapling abundance increased with pitch pine overstory proportional abundance and decreased as shrub oak saplings increased. This study represents the first multi-region assessment of pitch pine restoration treatments, confirming necessary conditions for pitch pine regeneration established by previous site-level work. While no single management strategy emerged as most effective, conditions resulting from higher severity disturbances appear more conducive to pitch pine regeneration establishment and provide managers with several options to maintain these ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire suppression and disconnection from historic fire regimes has a distinct and significant impact on fire-dependent natural communities, including regeneration of characteristic species, whose restoration may be further complicated by climate change. Pitch pine (Pinus rigida) barrens are a globally rare, fire-dependent natural community found primarily in the Northeast United States. We analyzed pitch pine regeneration response across 47 sites treated with 1) harvest (n = 6), 2) fall prescribed fire (n = 9), 3) spring prescribed fire (n = 9), 4) mowing followed by prescribed fire (n = 12), and 5) controls (n = 11), in barrens across the Northeast, to measure the impacts of regionally common restoration treatments on desired regeneration success. Leaf litter depth, mineral soil exposure, overstory basal area and composition, understory plant cover, and tree regeneration in three size classes across these five treatment types were compared. Pitch pine small seedling abundance was adversely impacted by greater litter depth, understory cover, and abundance of shrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia and Quercus prinoides) seedlings. All treatment types had significantly more small seedlings than untreated control units. Large seedling abundance was also negatively associated with increased litter depth. Pitch pine sapling abundance increased with pitch pine overstory proportional abundance and decreased as shrub oak saplings increased. This study represents the first multi-region assessment of pitch pine restoration treatments, confirming necessary conditions for pitch pine regeneration established by previous site-level work. While no single management strategy emerged as most effective, conditions resulting from higher severity disturbances appear more conducive to pitch pine regeneration establishment and provide managers with several options to maintain these ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同恢复措施下东北松林的树木更新动态
灭火和与历史火灾制度的分离对依赖火灾的自然群落具有明显而显著的影响,包括特征物种的更新,其恢复可能因气候变化而进一步复杂化。硬松林(Pinus rigida)是一种全球罕见的依赖火的自然群落,主要分布在美国东北部。我们分析了音高松再生反应在47个网站处理1)收获(n = 6),2)秋季规定火(n = 9),3)弹簧规定火(n = 9),4)割其次是规定的火灾(n = 12),和5)控制(n = 11),在东北各地的荒野,测量的影响区域共同修复治疗所需的再生成功。比较了5种处理方式下3个大小等级的凋落叶深度、矿质土暴露、林下植被基面积和组成、林下植被盖度和树木更新情况。大凋落物深度、林下覆盖度和灌木栎(栎和栎)幼苗丰度对沥青松小幼苗丰度有不利影响。所有处理类型的小幼苗都明显多于未处理的对照单位。大的幼苗丰度也与凋落物深度的增加负相关。柏油松幼树丰度随柏油松林下比例丰度的增加而增加,随灌丛栎幼树数量的增加而减少。本研究首次对沥青松恢复处理进行了多区域评估,确认了以往立地水平工作建立的沥青松再生的必要条件。虽然没有单一的管理策略是最有效的,但更严重的干扰所产生的条件似乎更有利于沥青松的再生建立,并为管理人员提供了几种维持这些生态系统的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the necessity for an integrated management of the two-spotted oak borer, Agrilus biguttatus, and associated research priorities The phenology of European forests as seen by MODIS Leaf Area Index and GEDI Plant Area Index: Toward an integrated approach Facilitation of underplanted broadleaf trees by pine canopy under Mediterranean conditions depends on thinning intensity and type, not on species drought tolerance Stand density and structural complexity modulate the effects of restorative selective cutting on aboveground carbon stocks Deciphering carbon-water trade-offs between plantations and natural forests in tibet through an ecological spatial network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1