Kathleen A. Stutzman , Anthony W. D’Amato , Kevin J. Dodds
{"title":"Tree regeneration dynamics under a range of restoration treatments in Northeast pitch pine (Pinus rigida) barrens","authors":"Kathleen A. Stutzman , Anthony W. D’Amato , Kevin J. Dodds","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fire suppression and disconnection from historic fire regimes has a distinct and significant impact on fire-dependent natural communities, including regeneration of characteristic species, whose restoration may be further complicated by climate change. Pitch pine (<em>Pinus rigida</em>) barrens are a globally rare, fire-dependent natural community found primarily in the Northeast United States. We analyzed pitch pine regeneration response across 47 sites treated with 1) harvest (n = 6), 2) fall prescribed fire (n = 9), 3) spring prescribed fire (n = 9), 4) mowing followed by prescribed fire (n = 12), and 5) controls (n = 11), in barrens across the Northeast, to measure the impacts of regionally common restoration treatments on desired regeneration success. Leaf litter depth, mineral soil exposure, overstory basal area and composition, understory plant cover, and tree regeneration in three size classes across these five treatment types were compared. Pitch pine small seedling abundance was adversely impacted by greater litter depth, understory cover, and abundance of shrub oak (<em>Quercus ilicifolia</em> and <em>Quercus prinoides</em>) seedlings. All treatment types had significantly more small seedlings than untreated control units. Large seedling abundance was also negatively associated with increased litter depth. Pitch pine sapling abundance increased with pitch pine overstory proportional abundance and decreased as shrub oak saplings increased. This study represents the first multi-region assessment of pitch pine restoration treatments, confirming necessary conditions for pitch pine regeneration established by previous site-level work. While no single management strategy emerged as most effective, conditions resulting from higher severity disturbances appear more conducive to pitch pine regeneration establishment and provide managers with several options to maintain these ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 122547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fire suppression and disconnection from historic fire regimes has a distinct and significant impact on fire-dependent natural communities, including regeneration of characteristic species, whose restoration may be further complicated by climate change. Pitch pine (Pinus rigida) barrens are a globally rare, fire-dependent natural community found primarily in the Northeast United States. We analyzed pitch pine regeneration response across 47 sites treated with 1) harvest (n = 6), 2) fall prescribed fire (n = 9), 3) spring prescribed fire (n = 9), 4) mowing followed by prescribed fire (n = 12), and 5) controls (n = 11), in barrens across the Northeast, to measure the impacts of regionally common restoration treatments on desired regeneration success. Leaf litter depth, mineral soil exposure, overstory basal area and composition, understory plant cover, and tree regeneration in three size classes across these five treatment types were compared. Pitch pine small seedling abundance was adversely impacted by greater litter depth, understory cover, and abundance of shrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia and Quercus prinoides) seedlings. All treatment types had significantly more small seedlings than untreated control units. Large seedling abundance was also negatively associated with increased litter depth. Pitch pine sapling abundance increased with pitch pine overstory proportional abundance and decreased as shrub oak saplings increased. This study represents the first multi-region assessment of pitch pine restoration treatments, confirming necessary conditions for pitch pine regeneration established by previous site-level work. While no single management strategy emerged as most effective, conditions resulting from higher severity disturbances appear more conducive to pitch pine regeneration establishment and provide managers with several options to maintain these ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.