Trusted commonsense knowledge enhanced depression detection based on three-way decision

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems with Applications Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125671
Jie Chen, Hui Yao, Shu Zhao, Yanping Zhang
{"title":"Trusted commonsense knowledge enhanced depression detection based on three-way decision","authors":"Jie Chen,&nbsp;Hui Yao,&nbsp;Shu Zhao,&nbsp;Yanping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Depression detection on social media aims to identify depressive tendencies within textual posts, providing timely intervention by the early detection of mental health issues. In predominant approaches, the Pre-trained Language Models(PLMs) are trained solely on public datasets, falling short of vertical scenarios due to insufficient domain-specific and commonsense knowledge. In addition, ambiguous commonsense knowledge could be misleading to PLMs and results in false judgments. Therefore, it poses significant challenges to select commonsense knowledge that is trusted. To address this, we propose CoKE, a model that incorporates trusted commonsense knowledge based on three-way decision theory to enhance depression detection. CoKE comprises three key modules: trusted screening, knowledge generation, and knowledge fusion. First, we utilize psychiatric clinical scales and three-way decision theory to screen out the uncertain domain from the massive user posts. Then, an adaptive framework is applied to generate and refine trusted commonsense knowledge that can explain the true semantics of posts in the uncertain domain. Finally, a dynamic integration of posts with highly trusted knowledge is achieved through a gating mechanism, resulting in embeddings enhanced by trusted commonsense knowledge that are more effective in determining depressive tendencies. We evaluate our model on two prominent datasets, eRisk2017 and eRisk2018, demonstrating its superiority over previous state-of-the-art baseline models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 125671"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424025387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression detection on social media aims to identify depressive tendencies within textual posts, providing timely intervention by the early detection of mental health issues. In predominant approaches, the Pre-trained Language Models(PLMs) are trained solely on public datasets, falling short of vertical scenarios due to insufficient domain-specific and commonsense knowledge. In addition, ambiguous commonsense knowledge could be misleading to PLMs and results in false judgments. Therefore, it poses significant challenges to select commonsense knowledge that is trusted. To address this, we propose CoKE, a model that incorporates trusted commonsense knowledge based on three-way decision theory to enhance depression detection. CoKE comprises three key modules: trusted screening, knowledge generation, and knowledge fusion. First, we utilize psychiatric clinical scales and three-way decision theory to screen out the uncertain domain from the massive user posts. Then, an adaptive framework is applied to generate and refine trusted commonsense knowledge that can explain the true semantics of posts in the uncertain domain. Finally, a dynamic integration of posts with highly trusted knowledge is achieved through a gating mechanism, resulting in embeddings enhanced by trusted commonsense knowledge that are more effective in determining depressive tendencies. We evaluate our model on two prominent datasets, eRisk2017 and eRisk2018, demonstrating its superiority over previous state-of-the-art baseline models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于三向决策的可信常识知识增强型抑郁检测
社交媒体上的抑郁检测旨在识别文本帖子中的抑郁倾向,通过早期发现心理健康问题提供及时干预。在主流方法中,预训练语言模型(PLMs)仅在公共数据集上进行训练,由于特定领域和常识知识不足,无法满足垂直场景的要求。此外,模棱两可的常识知识可能会误导 PLM,导致错误判断。因此,选择可信的常识性知识是一项重大挑战。为解决这一问题,我们提出了 CoKE 模型,该模型基于三向决策理论,将可信的常识知识纳入其中,以增强抑郁检测能力。CoKE 包括三个关键模块:可信筛选、知识生成和知识融合。首先,我们利用精神科临床量表和三向决策理论从海量用户帖子中筛选出不确定领域。然后,应用自适应框架生成并完善可信的常识性知识,这些知识可以解释不确定领域中帖子的真实语义。最后,通过门控机制实现帖子与高度可信知识的动态整合,从而产生由可信常识知识增强的嵌入,更有效地判断抑郁倾向。我们在两个著名的数据集(eRisk2017 和 eRisk2018)上对我们的模型进行了评估,结果表明它优于以前最先进的基线模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
期刊最新文献
Anticipating impression using textual sentiment based on ensemble LRD model Trusted commonsense knowledge enhanced depression detection based on three-way decision MSU-Net: Multi-Scale self-attention semantic segmentation method for oil-tea camellia planting area extraction in hilly areas of southern China Editorial Board DAN: Neural network based on dual attention for anomaly detection in ICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1