N. T. Le, A. Nguyen, T. H. T. Chan, D. P. Thambiratnam
{"title":"Damage Identification in Large-Scale Bridge Girders Using Output-Only Modal Flexibility–Based Deflections and Span-Similar Virtual Beam Models","authors":"N. T. Le, A. Nguyen, T. H. T. Chan, D. P. Thambiratnam","doi":"10.1155/2024/4087831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Damage identification (DI) methods using changes in static and modal flexibility (MF)–based deflections are effective tools to assess the damage in beam-like structures due to the explicit relationships between deflection change and stiffness reduction caused by damage. However, current methods developed for statically determinate beams require the calculation of mathematical scalar functions which do not exist in statically indeterminate beams and limit their application mainly to single-span bridges and cantilever structures. This paper presents an enhanced deflection-based damage identification (DBDI) method that can be applied to both statically determinate and indeterminate beams, including multispan girder bridges. The proposed method utilises the deflections obtained either from static tests or proportional defections extracted from output-only vibration tests. Specifically, general mathematical relationships between deflection change and relative deflection change with respect to the damage characteristics are established. From these, additional damage-locating criteria are proposed to help distinguish undamaged spans from the damaged ones and to identify the damage location within the damaged span. Notably, a span-similar virtual beam (SSVB) model concept is introduced to quantify the damage and make this task straightforward without the need to calculate complicated mathematical formulae. This model only requires information of the beam span length, which can be conveniently and accurately obtained from a real structure. The robustness of the method is tested through a series of case studies from a numerical two-span beam to a benchmark real slab-on-girder bridge as well as a complex large-scale box girder bridge (BGB). The results of these studies, including the minimal verification errors within five percent observed in the real bridge scenario, demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and can serve as a practical tool for structural health monitoring (SHM) of important highway bridges.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4087831","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4087831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Damage identification (DI) methods using changes in static and modal flexibility (MF)–based deflections are effective tools to assess the damage in beam-like structures due to the explicit relationships between deflection change and stiffness reduction caused by damage. However, current methods developed for statically determinate beams require the calculation of mathematical scalar functions which do not exist in statically indeterminate beams and limit their application mainly to single-span bridges and cantilever structures. This paper presents an enhanced deflection-based damage identification (DBDI) method that can be applied to both statically determinate and indeterminate beams, including multispan girder bridges. The proposed method utilises the deflections obtained either from static tests or proportional defections extracted from output-only vibration tests. Specifically, general mathematical relationships between deflection change and relative deflection change with respect to the damage characteristics are established. From these, additional damage-locating criteria are proposed to help distinguish undamaged spans from the damaged ones and to identify the damage location within the damaged span. Notably, a span-similar virtual beam (SSVB) model concept is introduced to quantify the damage and make this task straightforward without the need to calculate complicated mathematical formulae. This model only requires information of the beam span length, which can be conveniently and accurately obtained from a real structure. The robustness of the method is tested through a series of case studies from a numerical two-span beam to a benchmark real slab-on-girder bridge as well as a complex large-scale box girder bridge (BGB). The results of these studies, including the minimal verification errors within five percent observed in the real bridge scenario, demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and can serve as a practical tool for structural health monitoring (SHM) of important highway bridges.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications.
Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics.
Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.