Damage Identification in Large-Scale Bridge Girders Using Output-Only Modal Flexibility–Based Deflections and Span-Similar Virtual Beam Models

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Structural Control & Health Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1155/2024/4087831
N. T. Le, A. Nguyen, T. H. T. Chan, D. P. Thambiratnam
{"title":"Damage Identification in Large-Scale Bridge Girders Using Output-Only Modal Flexibility–Based Deflections and Span-Similar Virtual Beam Models","authors":"N. T. Le,&nbsp;A. Nguyen,&nbsp;T. H. T. Chan,&nbsp;D. P. Thambiratnam","doi":"10.1155/2024/4087831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Damage identification (DI) methods using changes in static and modal flexibility (MF)–based deflections are effective tools to assess the damage in beam-like structures due to the explicit relationships between deflection change and stiffness reduction caused by damage. However, current methods developed for statically determinate beams require the calculation of mathematical scalar functions which do not exist in statically indeterminate beams and limit their application mainly to single-span bridges and cantilever structures. This paper presents an enhanced deflection-based damage identification (DBDI) method that can be applied to both statically determinate and indeterminate beams, including multispan girder bridges. The proposed method utilises the deflections obtained either from static tests or proportional defections extracted from output-only vibration tests. Specifically, general mathematical relationships between deflection change and relative deflection change with respect to the damage characteristics are established. From these, additional damage-locating criteria are proposed to help distinguish undamaged spans from the damaged ones and to identify the damage location within the damaged span. Notably, a span-similar virtual beam (SSVB) model concept is introduced to quantify the damage and make this task straightforward without the need to calculate complicated mathematical formulae. This model only requires information of the beam span length, which can be conveniently and accurately obtained from a real structure. The robustness of the method is tested through a series of case studies from a numerical two-span beam to a benchmark real slab-on-girder bridge as well as a complex large-scale box girder bridge (BGB). The results of these studies, including the minimal verification errors within five percent observed in the real bridge scenario, demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and can serve as a practical tool for structural health monitoring (SHM) of important highway bridges.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4087831","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4087831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Damage identification (DI) methods using changes in static and modal flexibility (MF)–based deflections are effective tools to assess the damage in beam-like structures due to the explicit relationships between deflection change and stiffness reduction caused by damage. However, current methods developed for statically determinate beams require the calculation of mathematical scalar functions which do not exist in statically indeterminate beams and limit their application mainly to single-span bridges and cantilever structures. This paper presents an enhanced deflection-based damage identification (DBDI) method that can be applied to both statically determinate and indeterminate beams, including multispan girder bridges. The proposed method utilises the deflections obtained either from static tests or proportional defections extracted from output-only vibration tests. Specifically, general mathematical relationships between deflection change and relative deflection change with respect to the damage characteristics are established. From these, additional damage-locating criteria are proposed to help distinguish undamaged spans from the damaged ones and to identify the damage location within the damaged span. Notably, a span-similar virtual beam (SSVB) model concept is introduced to quantify the damage and make this task straightforward without the need to calculate complicated mathematical formulae. This model only requires information of the beam span length, which can be conveniently and accurately obtained from a real structure. The robustness of the method is tested through a series of case studies from a numerical two-span beam to a benchmark real slab-on-girder bridge as well as a complex large-scale box girder bridge (BGB). The results of these studies, including the minimal verification errors within five percent observed in the real bridge scenario, demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and can serve as a practical tool for structural health monitoring (SHM) of important highway bridges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于输出模态柔性的挠度和跨度相似的虚拟梁模型识别大型桥梁梁的损伤
基于静态和模态柔度(MF)挠度变化的损伤识别(DI)方法是评估类梁结构损伤的有效工具,因为损伤导致的挠度变化和刚度降低之间存在明确的关系。然而,目前针对静定梁开发的方法需要计算数学标量函数,而这些函数在静不定梁中并不存在,这就限制了这些方法主要在单跨桥梁和悬臂结构中的应用。本文提出了一种增强的基于挠度的损伤识别(DBDI)方法,可同时应用于定常梁和不定常梁,包括多跨梁桥。该方法利用从静力试验中获得的挠度或从纯输出振动试验中提取的比例缺陷。具体来说,建立了挠度变化和相对挠度变化与损伤特征之间的一般数学关系。在此基础上,提出了更多的损坏定位标准,以帮助区分未损坏的跨度和损坏的跨度,并确定损坏跨度内的损坏位置。值得注意的是,引入了跨度相似虚拟梁(SSVB)模型概念来量化损伤,使这项任务变得简单明了,无需计算复杂的数学公式。该模型只需要梁跨度的信息,而这些信息可以从实际结构中方便、准确地获得。该方法的稳健性通过一系列案例研究进行了测试,从数值双跨梁到基准实际梁板桥以及复杂的大型箱梁桥(BGB)。这些研究的结果,包括在实际桥梁场景中观察到的 5% 以内的最小验证误差,证明了所提出的方法是稳健的,可以作为重要公路桥梁结构健康监测 (SHM) 的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Control & Health Monitoring
Structural Control & Health Monitoring 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
234
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications. Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics. Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.
期刊最新文献
Damage Identification in Large-Scale Bridge Girders Using Output-Only Modal Flexibility–Based Deflections and Span-Similar Virtual Beam Models A Multiple-Point Deformation Monitoring Model for Ultrahigh Arch Dams Using Temperature Lag and Optimized Gaussian Process Regression A Graph-Based Methodology for Optimal Design of Inerter-Based Passive Vibration Absorbers With Minimum Complexity Automatic Identification and Segmentation of Long-Span Rail-and-Road Cable-Stayed Bridges Using UAV LiDAR Point Cloud Development of 6 Degrees of Freedom Parallel-Link Shaking Table for Three-Dimensional Movement on Centrifugal Loading Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1