Layers of inequality: gender, medicalisation and obstetric violence in Ghana.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02331-z
Abena Asefuaba Yalley
{"title":"Layers of inequality: gender, medicalisation and obstetric violence in Ghana.","authors":"Abena Asefuaba Yalley","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02331-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study explored how gender inequalities in health systems influence women's experiences of obstetric violence in Ghana. Obstetric violence is recognised as a major public health concern and human rights violation. In particular, it reduces women's trust and use of health facilities for childbirth, thereby increasing the risks of maternal and neonatal mortality. In Ghana, obstetric violence is pervasive and normalised; yet, little is known about the gendered dynamics of this phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted in eight public health facilities in Ghana. Specifically, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 midwives who work in the maternity units and 35 women who have utilised the obstetric services of the hospitals for childbirth. The midwives and women were selected using the purposive sampling technique. The transcripts of the interviews were coded using NVivo qualitative data analysis software and were thematically analysed. Secondary materials such as existing data on the medical profession in Ghana were utilised to complement the primary data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that there are huge structural inequalities that keep women at the lower cadres of the health system. Five major themes depicting how gender inequalities contribute to women's experiences of obstetric violence emerged: gender inequality in the medical profession, unequally and heavily tasked, feminisation of midwifery, patriarchal pressures and ideologies, and gender insensitivity in resource provision. These inequalities impact the kind of care midwives provide, which is often characterised by mistreatment and abuse of women during childbirth. The study also discovered that patriarchal ideologies about women and their bodies lead to power and control in the delivery room and violence has become a major instrument of domination and control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hierarchical structure of the healthcare profession puts the midwifery profession in a vulnerable position, with negative consequences for maternity care (obstetric violence). The study recommends that gender-responsive approaches that address structural inequalities in health systems, women's empowerment over their bodies and male involvement in women's reproductive care are crucial in dealing with obstetric violence in Ghana.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02331-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study explored how gender inequalities in health systems influence women's experiences of obstetric violence in Ghana. Obstetric violence is recognised as a major public health concern and human rights violation. In particular, it reduces women's trust and use of health facilities for childbirth, thereby increasing the risks of maternal and neonatal mortality. In Ghana, obstetric violence is pervasive and normalised; yet, little is known about the gendered dynamics of this phenomenon.

Methodology: A qualitative study was conducted in eight public health facilities in Ghana. Specifically, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 midwives who work in the maternity units and 35 women who have utilised the obstetric services of the hospitals for childbirth. The midwives and women were selected using the purposive sampling technique. The transcripts of the interviews were coded using NVivo qualitative data analysis software and were thematically analysed. Secondary materials such as existing data on the medical profession in Ghana were utilised to complement the primary data.

Results: The study revealed that there are huge structural inequalities that keep women at the lower cadres of the health system. Five major themes depicting how gender inequalities contribute to women's experiences of obstetric violence emerged: gender inequality in the medical profession, unequally and heavily tasked, feminisation of midwifery, patriarchal pressures and ideologies, and gender insensitivity in resource provision. These inequalities impact the kind of care midwives provide, which is often characterised by mistreatment and abuse of women during childbirth. The study also discovered that patriarchal ideologies about women and their bodies lead to power and control in the delivery room and violence has become a major instrument of domination and control.

Conclusion: The hierarchical structure of the healthcare profession puts the midwifery profession in a vulnerable position, with negative consequences for maternity care (obstetric violence). The study recommends that gender-responsive approaches that address structural inequalities in health systems, women's empowerment over their bodies and male involvement in women's reproductive care are crucial in dealing with obstetric violence in Ghana.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层层不平等:加纳的性别、医疗化和产科暴力。
研究背景本研究探讨了卫生系统中的性别不平等如何影响加纳妇女遭受产科暴力的经历。产科暴力是公认的重大公共卫生问题和侵犯人权行为。尤其是,它降低了妇女对医疗设施的信任和对分娩的使用,从而增加了孕产妇和新生儿死亡的风险。在加纳,产科暴力普遍存在并被正常化;然而,人们对这一现象的性别动态却知之甚少:在加纳的八家公共医疗机构开展了一项定性研究。具体而言,对 30 名在产科工作的助产士和 35 名利用医院产科服务分娩的妇女进行了半结构化访谈。助产士和产妇是通过有目的的抽样技术选出的。访谈记录使用 NVivo 定性数据分析软件进行编码,并进行主题分析。此外,还利用加纳医疗行业的现有数据等二手资料对原始数据进行了补充:研究结果表明,巨大的结构性不平等使妇女处于卫生系统的低层。出现了五大主题,描述了性别不平等是如何导致妇女遭受产科暴力的:医疗行业的性别不平等、任务不平等且繁重、助产士女性化、重男轻女的压力和意识形态,以及在提供资源时对性别问题不敏感。这些不平等现象影响了助产士提供的护理服务,其特点往往是在分娩过程中虐待和凌辱妇女。研究还发现,关于妇女及其身体的父权意识形态导致了产房中的权力和控制,暴力已成为支配和控制的主要手段:结论:医疗保健行业的等级结构使助产士行业处于弱势地位,对产妇护理(产科暴力)产生了负面影响。研究建议,采取促进两性平等的方法,解决保健系统中的结构性不平等、妇女对其身体的赋权以及男性参与妇女的生殖保健等问题,对于解决加纳的产科暴力问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China. Gender disparities in physical, psychological, and cognitive multimorbidity among elderly hypertensive populations in rural regions. Medicare policy changes to primary health care funding for Australia's indigenous Peoples 1996-2023: a scoping review. How can health systems under stress achieve universal health coverage and health equity? Layers of inequality: gender, medicalisation and obstetric violence in Ghana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1