Fitness differences override variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms in California grasslands

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.14451
Andrew J. Muehleisen, Caitlin T. White, Lauren S. Shoemaker, Katharine N. Suding, E. Ashley Shaw Adams, Lauren M. Hallett
{"title":"Fitness differences override variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms in California grasslands","authors":"Andrew J. Muehleisen, Caitlin T. White, Lauren S. Shoemaker, Katharine N. Suding, E. Ashley Shaw Adams, Lauren M. Hallett","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>While most studies of species coexistence focus on the mechanisms that maintain coexistence, it is equally important to understand the mechanisms that structure failed coexistence. For example, California annual grasslands are heavily invaded ecosystems, where non‐native annuals have largely dominated and replaced native communities. These systems are also highly variable, with a high degree of rainfall seasonality and interannual rainfall variability—a quality implicated in the coexistence of functionally distinct species. Yet, despite the apparent strength of this variation, coexistence between native and non‐native annuals in this system has faltered.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>To test how variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms modulate failed coexistence, we implemented a competition experiment between two previously common native forbs and three now‐dominant non‐native annual grasses spanning a conservative‐acquisitive range of traits. We grew individuals from each species under varying densities of all other species as competitors, under either wetter or drier early season rainfall treatments. Using subsequent seed production, we parameterized competition models, assessed the potential for coexistence among species pairs and quantified the relative influence of variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>As expected, we found little potential for coexistence. Competition was dominated by the non‐native grass <jats:italic>Avena fatua</jats:italic>, while native forbs were unable to invade non‐native grasses. Mutual competitive exclusion was common across almost all species and often contingent on rainfall, suggesting rainfall‐mediated priority effects. Among variation‐dependent mechanisms, the temporal storage effect had a moderate stabilizing effect for four of five species when averaged across competitors, while relative nonlinearity in competition was largely destabilizing, except for the most conservative non‐native grass, which benefited from a competitive release under dry conditions.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>: Our findings suggest that rainfall variability does little to mitigate the fitness differences that underlie widespread annual grass invasion in California, but that it influences coexistence dynamics among the now‐dominant non‐native grasses.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While most studies of species coexistence focus on the mechanisms that maintain coexistence, it is equally important to understand the mechanisms that structure failed coexistence. For example, California annual grasslands are heavily invaded ecosystems, where non‐native annuals have largely dominated and replaced native communities. These systems are also highly variable, with a high degree of rainfall seasonality and interannual rainfall variability—a quality implicated in the coexistence of functionally distinct species. Yet, despite the apparent strength of this variation, coexistence between native and non‐native annuals in this system has faltered. To test how variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms modulate failed coexistence, we implemented a competition experiment between two previously common native forbs and three now‐dominant non‐native annual grasses spanning a conservative‐acquisitive range of traits. We grew individuals from each species under varying densities of all other species as competitors, under either wetter or drier early season rainfall treatments. Using subsequent seed production, we parameterized competition models, assessed the potential for coexistence among species pairs and quantified the relative influence of variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms. As expected, we found little potential for coexistence. Competition was dominated by the non‐native grass Avena fatua, while native forbs were unable to invade non‐native grasses. Mutual competitive exclusion was common across almost all species and often contingent on rainfall, suggesting rainfall‐mediated priority effects. Among variation‐dependent mechanisms, the temporal storage effect had a moderate stabilizing effect for four of five species when averaged across competitors, while relative nonlinearity in competition was largely destabilizing, except for the most conservative non‐native grass, which benefited from a competitive release under dry conditions. Synthesis: Our findings suggest that rainfall variability does little to mitigate the fitness differences that underlie widespread annual grass invasion in California, but that it influences coexistence dynamics among the now‐dominant non‐native grasses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加利福尼亚草地上的适应性差异压倒了依赖变异的共存机制
虽然大多数物种共存研究都侧重于维持共存的机制,但了解共存失败的结构机制也同样重要。例如,加利福尼亚的一年生草地是入侵严重的生态系统,非本地一年生植物在很大程度上主导并取代了本地群落。这些系统也是高度多变的,降雨季节性和年际降雨变异性都很高--这与功能不同的物种共存有关。然而,尽管这种变异明显存在,该系统中本地和非本地一年生植物之间的共存却并不顺利。为了测试依赖于变异的共存机制是如何调节共存失败的,我们在两种以前常见的本地牧草和三种现在占优势的非本地一年生禾本科植物之间进行了一次竞争实验,其性状范围跨越了保守-获取的范围。我们在不同密度的所有其他物种作为竞争者的情况下,在较潮湿或较干燥的早季降雨处理下,种植了每种物种的个体。通过随后的种子生产,我们对竞争模型进行了参数化,评估了物种对之间的共存潜力,并量化了依赖于变异的共存机制的相对影响。不出所料,我们发现共存的可能性很小。竞争主要由非本地草莜麦主导,而本地草本植物无法入侵非本地草。相互竞争排斥几乎在所有物种中都很常见,而且往往取决于降雨量,这表明降雨介导了优先效应。在依赖变异的机制中,当平均到所有竞争者时,时间贮存效应对五个物种中的四个具有适度的稳定作用,而竞争中的相对非线性在很大程度上破坏了稳定,但最保守的非本地草除外,它在干旱条件下从竞争释放中获益。综述:我们的研究结果表明,降雨量的多变性对缓解加州一年生草类大面积入侵的适应性差异作用不大,但会影响目前占优势的非本地草类之间的共存动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
期刊最新文献
Fitness differences override variation‐dependent coexistence mechanisms in California grasslands Environmental conditions affect the allelopathic potential of three invasive alien plants species in North-Eastern France Indirect effects of warming via phenology on reproductive success of alpine plants Rhizosphere as a hotspot for microbial necromass deposition into the soil carbon pool Aerial litter mimicry: A novel form of floral deception mediated by a monoterpene synthase
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1