Limitations of using LCOE as economic indicator for solar power plants

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115087
Giampaolo Manzolini , Giancarlo Gentile , Lorenzo Pilotti , Emanuele Martelli , Giovanni Picotti , Marco Binotti , Michael E. Cholette
{"title":"Limitations of using LCOE as economic indicator for solar power plants","authors":"Giampaolo Manzolini ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Gentile ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pilotti ,&nbsp;Emanuele Martelli ,&nbsp;Giovanni Picotti ,&nbsp;Marco Binotti ,&nbsp;Michael E. Cholette","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the increasing penetration of renewable energy, the importance of power plant dispatchability has become more relevant; an aspect that is not accounted in the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) parameter. This paper presents a mathematical model to optimize solar plant design based on optimized dispatching strategies considering real grid demand and prices. To demonstrate that the LCOE is not the correct optimization parameter of Photovoltaic and Concentrated Solar Power technologies, the application of the new approach is performed considering their installation in South Australia and Southern California. Sixteen different cases are proposed to assess the importance of the boundary conditions (location with corresponding electricity load curve, cost of the technology and possibility to purchase electricity from the grid) on the plant design.</div><div>Results show that the optimal plant design significantly differs when considering the actual prices with respect to the common LCOE approach. The LCOE approach does not lead to any storage installation in PV plants and operates CSP plant around the clock. The optimized design based on the grid needs generates the electricity when the prices are high by introducing the storage in the PV and reducing the solar field area as well as the thermal storage size. Overall, the Net Present Value and the IRR can be increased by 10 times and 70 %, respectively, by adopting optimized design with respect to the one achieved with the typical LCOE approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 115087"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400813X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing penetration of renewable energy, the importance of power plant dispatchability has become more relevant; an aspect that is not accounted in the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) parameter. This paper presents a mathematical model to optimize solar plant design based on optimized dispatching strategies considering real grid demand and prices. To demonstrate that the LCOE is not the correct optimization parameter of Photovoltaic and Concentrated Solar Power technologies, the application of the new approach is performed considering their installation in South Australia and Southern California. Sixteen different cases are proposed to assess the importance of the boundary conditions (location with corresponding electricity load curve, cost of the technology and possibility to purchase electricity from the grid) on the plant design.
Results show that the optimal plant design significantly differs when considering the actual prices with respect to the common LCOE approach. The LCOE approach does not lead to any storage installation in PV plants and operates CSP plant around the clock. The optimized design based on the grid needs generates the electricity when the prices are high by introducing the storage in the PV and reducing the solar field area as well as the thermal storage size. Overall, the Net Present Value and the IRR can be increased by 10 times and 70 %, respectively, by adopting optimized design with respect to the one achieved with the typical LCOE approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 LCOE 作为太阳能发电厂经济指标的局限性
随着可再生能源渗透率的不断提高,发电厂可调度性的重要性日益凸显;而这是平准化电力成本(LCOE)参数中没有考虑的一个方面。本文提出了一个数学模型,基于考虑实际电网需求和价格的优化调度策略来优化太阳能发电厂的设计。为了证明 LCOE 并非光伏发电和聚光太阳能发电技术的正确优化参数,本文考虑了在南澳大利亚和南加州安装这些技术的情况,应用了新方法。提出了 16 种不同的情况,以评估边界条件(具有相应电力负荷曲线的地点、技术成本和从电网购电的可能性)对电站设计的重要性。结果表明,在考虑实际价格时,最优电站设计与普通的 LCOE 方法存在显著差异。LCOE 方法不会导致在光伏电站中安装任何储能设备,并使 CSP 电站全天候运行。而基于电网需求的优化设计则通过在光伏发电厂中引入储能装置、减少太阳能发电场面积和热储能容量,在电价较高时发电。总体而言,与典型的 LCOE 方法相比,采用优化设计可使净现值和内部收益率分别提高 10 倍和 70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural optimisation of free-swinging agrivoltaic fences A comprehensive review of grid support services from solar photovoltaic power plants Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments Evaluating China's 2030 carbon peak goal: Post-COVID-19 systematic review Levelized cost of repurposing oil and gas infrastructure for clean energy in the Gulf of Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1