Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115152
Anceita Jepleting , Achisa C. Mecha , Dorcas Sombei , Doricah Moraa , Martha N. Chollom
{"title":"Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments","authors":"Anceita Jepleting ,&nbsp;Achisa C. Mecha ,&nbsp;Dorcas Sombei ,&nbsp;Doricah Moraa ,&nbsp;Martha N. Chollom","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rampant use of fossil fuels resulting in environmental pollution has necessitated the exploration of renewable energy sources. Sustainable development goal 7 stipulates the need for affordable, clean energy to meet human and industrial needs. Abundance of organic waste, in developing economies, makes methane from biogas a major source of renewable energy. The main limitation being that the raw biogas contains carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and other unwanted gases, therefore it requires purification to remove non-methane components. However, existing biogas purification and upgrading systems are relatively expensive and require sophisticated technology and skills to operate them, hence they are unaffordable especially in many developing economies. Besides, these technologies are mainly applicable to large scale systems and are unsuitable for the small-scale systems mostly found in developing economies. This review critically evaluates the potential of low-cost biogas purification materials such as iron rich soils, activated carbon from solid waste, waste iron fillings, and biomass ash for use in household and small-scale biogas plants. These materials have demonstrated considerable performance achieving the following removal efficiencies; clay (90 %); iron-rich New Zealand Brown soil (93.8 %); commercial steel wool (95 %); and compost (80 %). This study proposes new ways to improve the performance of these materials through proper pretreatment of biomass ash to reduce moisture content, surface modification of activated carbon for improved acid gas uptake, integration of adsorbents to create synergy, regeneration and reuse of these adsorbents to promote sustainability. Low-cost materials demonstrate great promise towards achieving SDG 7 especially in developing economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115152"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rampant use of fossil fuels resulting in environmental pollution has necessitated the exploration of renewable energy sources. Sustainable development goal 7 stipulates the need for affordable, clean energy to meet human and industrial needs. Abundance of organic waste, in developing economies, makes methane from biogas a major source of renewable energy. The main limitation being that the raw biogas contains carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and other unwanted gases, therefore it requires purification to remove non-methane components. However, existing biogas purification and upgrading systems are relatively expensive and require sophisticated technology and skills to operate them, hence they are unaffordable especially in many developing economies. Besides, these technologies are mainly applicable to large scale systems and are unsuitable for the small-scale systems mostly found in developing economies. This review critically evaluates the potential of low-cost biogas purification materials such as iron rich soils, activated carbon from solid waste, waste iron fillings, and biomass ash for use in household and small-scale biogas plants. These materials have demonstrated considerable performance achieving the following removal efficiencies; clay (90 %); iron-rich New Zealand Brown soil (93.8 %); commercial steel wool (95 %); and compost (80 %). This study proposes new ways to improve the performance of these materials through proper pretreatment of biomass ash to reduce moisture content, surface modification of activated carbon for improved acid gas uptake, integration of adsorbents to create synergy, regeneration and reuse of these adsorbents to promote sustainability. Low-cost materials demonstrate great promise towards achieving SDG 7 especially in developing economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural optimisation of free-swinging agrivoltaic fences A comprehensive review of grid support services from solar photovoltaic power plants Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments Evaluating China's 2030 carbon peak goal: Post-COVID-19 systematic review Levelized cost of repurposing oil and gas infrastructure for clean energy in the Gulf of Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1