Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Research in Transportation Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101493
Linda Wårell, Kristina Ek
{"title":"Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services","authors":"Linda Wårell,&nbsp;Kristina Ek","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines preferences for future transports, focusing specifically on shared transports and autonomous vehicles, in a national context. A choice experiment approach is applied in which respondents are asked to choose between individual and shared transport services, each associated with different attribute levels (driver/autonomous, waiting and travel times, and costs) for a trip to go grocery shopping. Data are analysed by applying latent class modelling, which facilitates the analysis of heterogeneity in preferences for the attributes across different groups in the sample. The results reveal three groups with considerable heterogeneity in preferences: the group accepting <em>trade-offs</em>, the <em>lone-wolves,</em> and the <em>sociable.</em> The <em>trade-off</em> group do not want to share transport, but are positive towards autonomous vehicles, and make trade-offs between these characteristics and costs. The members in the <em>lone-wolves</em> group are only concerned about not travelling in a shared transport. Members in the smallest <em>sociable</em> group are positive about sharing transports but reject autonomous vehicles. Women are overrepresented in the <em>sociable</em> group, as are people with environmental concern and those who lack a driver's licence. Overall, we find that a majority of the sample does not want to share transport services, which potentially constitutes a major challenge for policy makers regarding reaching environmental transport policy goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073988592400088X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines preferences for future transports, focusing specifically on shared transports and autonomous vehicles, in a national context. A choice experiment approach is applied in which respondents are asked to choose between individual and shared transport services, each associated with different attribute levels (driver/autonomous, waiting and travel times, and costs) for a trip to go grocery shopping. Data are analysed by applying latent class modelling, which facilitates the analysis of heterogeneity in preferences for the attributes across different groups in the sample. The results reveal three groups with considerable heterogeneity in preferences: the group accepting trade-offs, the lone-wolves, and the sociable. The trade-off group do not want to share transport, but are positive towards autonomous vehicles, and make trade-offs between these characteristics and costs. The members in the lone-wolves group are only concerned about not travelling in a shared transport. Members in the smallest sociable group are positive about sharing transports but reject autonomous vehicles. Women are overrepresented in the sociable group, as are people with environmental concern and those who lack a driver's licence. Overall, we find that a majority of the sample does not want to share transport services, which potentially constitutes a major challenge for policy makers regarding reaching environmental transport policy goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雄性独狼和善于交际的雌性 - 对共享和 AV 交通服务的偏好
本文以国家为背景,研究了人们对未来交通工具的偏好,尤其关注共享交通工具和自动驾驶汽车。本文采用了一种选择实验方法,要求受访者在个人和共享交通服务之间做出选择,每种服务都与不同的属性水平(司机/自动驾驶、等待和旅行时间以及成本)相关联。数据分析采用潜类建模法,便于分析样本中不同群体对属性偏好的异质性。结果显示,有三个群体的偏好具有相当大的异质性:接受权衡的群体、独行侠和善于交际的群体。接受权衡的群体不希望共享交通工具,但对自动驾驶汽车持积极态度,并在这些特征和成本之间做出权衡。独狼组的成员只关心不乘坐共享交通工具。最小交际群体的成员对共享交通工具持积极态度,但拒绝自动驾驶汽车。在善于交际的群体中,女性比例较高,关注环境的人和没有驾照的人也是如此。总之,我们发现大多数样本都不希望共享交通服务,这可能是政策制定者在实现环境交通政策目标方面面临的一大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
期刊最新文献
An importance-performance analysis of public transport to the university campus based on best-worst scaling The dominant factors of dividend policies: Capital needs or agency problems? —— An empirical study based on the introduction of high-speed rail in cities of China A novel comprehensive spatial accessibility indicator to capture the latent nature of accessibility in logistic warehouses External environments and the growth of low-cost carriers in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and future research agendas Why to buy or why not to buy? - Revealing the inherent mechanism and the psychological impacts on the behavior of purchasing automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1