Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1
Gonçalo Sítima, Carlos Galhardo-Branco, Paulo Reis-Pina
{"title":"Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.","authors":"Gonçalo Sítima, Carlos Galhardo-Branco, Paulo Reis-Pina","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) has the potential to alleviate suffering and enhance quality of life for patients with serious progressive diseases; however, access to PC remains unequal across different populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically examine the literature on: (1) the primary contributors to inequity in accessing PC; (2) the key barriers to achieving equitable access to PC; (3) the essential recommendations for addressing these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for English-language articles published since 2017.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Population- people with chronic, progressive, life-threatening, or limiting diseases. Interventions- any PC intervention, including teams, services, programs, or strategies implemented in both hospital and community settings. Outcomes- equity in access to PC. Study Design- any. The PRISMA (extension for scoping reviews) recommendations were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included: half originated from North America (USA, n = 5; Canada, n = 2) and the other half from Europe (UK, n = 4; Spain, n = 1) and Australia (n = 2). Most studies focused on ethnic/racial discrimination (n = 4) or geographical discrepancies (n = 4). The remaining studies addressed PC in low- or middle-income countries (n = 2), gender discrepancies (n = 1), informal caregiving (n = 1), socioeconomic inequities (n = 2), and barriers to accessing PC (n = 1). Barriers to equitable access to PC include difficulties in identifying patients nearing the end of life, the \"survival imperative,\" the \"normalization of dying,\" misconceptions, mistrust, limited information about PC and end-of-life care, and a fragmented care system. Conversely, enablers of equitable access to PC encompass proper patient evaluation and workforce education, addressing basic survival needs and social determinants of equity, and promoting intersectoral collaboration, community advocacy, and engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving equity in PC is a complex endeavor requiring strong commitment and action at both policy and governmental levels. Additionally, it calls for sustained efforts in clinical practice, workforce planning, capacity building, community engagement, and research investment to implement and assess public health approaches to PC. Future research should aim to provide more comprehensive and generalizable insights into the determinants of equitable access, as well as the enablers and barriers to PC and end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care (PC) has the potential to alleviate suffering and enhance quality of life for patients with serious progressive diseases; however, access to PC remains unequal across different populations.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically examine the literature on: (1) the primary contributors to inequity in accessing PC; (2) the key barriers to achieving equitable access to PC; (3) the essential recommendations for addressing these issues.

Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for English-language articles published since 2017.

Eligibility criteria: Population- people with chronic, progressive, life-threatening, or limiting diseases. Interventions- any PC intervention, including teams, services, programs, or strategies implemented in both hospital and community settings. Outcomes- equity in access to PC. Study Design- any. The PRISMA (extension for scoping reviews) recommendations were followed.

Results: Fourteen studies were included: half originated from North America (USA, n = 5; Canada, n = 2) and the other half from Europe (UK, n = 4; Spain, n = 1) and Australia (n = 2). Most studies focused on ethnic/racial discrimination (n = 4) or geographical discrepancies (n = 4). The remaining studies addressed PC in low- or middle-income countries (n = 2), gender discrepancies (n = 1), informal caregiving (n = 1), socioeconomic inequities (n = 2), and barriers to accessing PC (n = 1). Barriers to equitable access to PC include difficulties in identifying patients nearing the end of life, the "survival imperative," the "normalization of dying," misconceptions, mistrust, limited information about PC and end-of-life care, and a fragmented care system. Conversely, enablers of equitable access to PC encompass proper patient evaluation and workforce education, addressing basic survival needs and social determinants of equity, and promoting intersectoral collaboration, community advocacy, and engagement.

Conclusion: Achieving equity in PC is a complex endeavor requiring strong commitment and action at both policy and governmental levels. Additionally, it calls for sustained efforts in clinical practice, workforce planning, capacity building, community engagement, and research investment to implement and assess public health approaches to PC. Future research should aim to provide more comprehensive and generalizable insights into the determinants of equitable access, as well as the enablers and barriers to PC and end-of-life care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:姑息关怀(PC)有可能减轻严重进展性疾病患者的痛苦并提高其生活质量;然而,不同人群获得姑息关怀的机会仍然不平等:本次范围界定综述旨在系统研究以下方面的文献:目的:本综述旨在系统研究以下方面的文献:(1) 造成 PC 使用不平等的主要因素;(2) 实现 PC 公平使用的主要障碍;(3) 解决这些问题的基本建议:在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库中搜索自 2017 年以来发表的英文文章:人群--患有慢性、进展性、危及生命或限制性疾病的患者。干预措施--任何 PC 干预措施,包括在医院和社区环境中实施的团队、服务、计划或策略。结果--获得 PC 的公平性。研究设计 - 任何设计。研究遵循了 PRISMA(范围界定审查扩展)的建议:共纳入 14 项研究:一半来自北美(美国,n = 5;加拿大,n = 2),另一半来自欧洲(英国,n = 4;西班牙,n = 1)和澳大利亚(n = 2)。大多数研究侧重于民族/种族歧视(4 项)或地域差异(4 项)。其余的研究涉及低收入或中等收入国家的个人护理(2 项)、性别差异(1 项)、非正规护理(1 项)、社会经济不平等(2 项)以及获得个人护理的障碍(1 项)。阻碍公平获得临终关怀的因素包括:难以识别临终患者、"生存需要"、"死亡正常化"、误解、不信任、有关临终关怀和生命末期护理的信息有限以及护理系统分散。与此相反,促进公平获得临终关怀的因素包括适当的患者评估和劳动力教育、解决基本生存需求和公平的社会决定因素,以及促进跨部门合作、社区宣传和参与:实现 PC 的公平性是一项复杂的工作,需要政策和政府层面的坚定承诺和行动。此外,还需要在临床实践、劳动力规划、能力建设、社区参与和研究投资方面持续努力,以实施和评估 PC 的公共卫生方法。未来的研究应旨在就公平获取的决定因素以及 PC 和临终关怀的促进因素和障碍提供更全面、更普遍的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review. Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China. Gender disparities in physical, psychological, and cognitive multimorbidity among elderly hypertensive populations in rural regions. Medicare policy changes to primary health care funding for Australia's indigenous Peoples 1996-2023: a scoping review. How can health systems under stress achieve universal health coverage and health equity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1