The effectiveness of olfactory training for chronic olfactory disorder following COVID-19: a systematic review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1457527
Natalia Treder-Rochna, Aleksandra Mańkowska, Wiktoria Kujawa, Michał Harciarek
{"title":"The effectiveness of olfactory training for chronic olfactory disorder following COVID-19: a systematic review.","authors":"Natalia Treder-Rochna, Aleksandra Mańkowska, Wiktoria Kujawa, Michał Harciarek","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1457527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic olfactory disorders are some of the most frequent post-COVID-19 presentations. Olfactory training (OT) is currently the most popular method used for treating post-viral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD). We evaluated the effect of olfactory training on the chronic olfactory disorders of patients infected with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed per PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Library. Only patients with chronic olfactory disorders of 30 days or more were included. The primary outcome was the olfactory score at the end of follow-up. In all studies, improvement was defined as a positive change over time in the results of objective psychophysical olfactory tests. The most commonly used test was the Sniffin' Sticks. Typically, outcome measures involved comparing the mean olfactory scores. In the Sniffin' Sticks test, an improvement was also indicated by a change of 5.5 points or more in the Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies (1.596 participants) were included in this review. Among the included studies, up to 10 were RCTs. Nine studies assessed the combined effects of adjuvant therapy and olfactory training, while five studies assessed only OT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our assessment, olfactory training alone produces significant improvements in chronic olfactory dysfunctions. However, a combined therapy approach is essential to achieve more effective outcomes. Integrating olfactory training with adjuvants like CoUltraPEALut, Cerebrolysin, and oral Vitamin A has demonstrated substantial benefits in enhancing post-COVID-19 olfactory function. Strict adherence to the OT protocol and extending the duration of OT to 3 months or more significantly enhance treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1457527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1457527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic olfactory disorders are some of the most frequent post-COVID-19 presentations. Olfactory training (OT) is currently the most popular method used for treating post-viral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD). We evaluated the effect of olfactory training on the chronic olfactory disorders of patients infected with COVID-19.

Methodology: A systematic literature search was performed per PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Library. Only patients with chronic olfactory disorders of 30 days or more were included. The primary outcome was the olfactory score at the end of follow-up. In all studies, improvement was defined as a positive change over time in the results of objective psychophysical olfactory tests. The most commonly used test was the Sniffin' Sticks. Typically, outcome measures involved comparing the mean olfactory scores. In the Sniffin' Sticks test, an improvement was also indicated by a change of 5.5 points or more in the Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification scores.

Results: Fourteen studies (1.596 participants) were included in this review. Among the included studies, up to 10 were RCTs. Nine studies assessed the combined effects of adjuvant therapy and olfactory training, while five studies assessed only OT.

Conclusions: In our assessment, olfactory training alone produces significant improvements in chronic olfactory dysfunctions. However, a combined therapy approach is essential to achieve more effective outcomes. Integrating olfactory training with adjuvants like CoUltraPEALut, Cerebrolysin, and oral Vitamin A has demonstrated substantial benefits in enhancing post-COVID-19 olfactory function. Strict adherence to the OT protocol and extending the duration of OT to 3 months or more significantly enhance treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19之后嗅觉训练治疗慢性嗅觉障碍的效果:系统综述。
背景:慢性嗅觉障碍是 COVID-19 后最常见的症状之一。嗅觉训练(OT)是目前治疗病毒感染后嗅觉功能障碍(PVOD)最常用的方法。我们评估了嗅觉训练对 COVID-19 感染者慢性嗅觉障碍的影响:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EBSCOhost 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。仅纳入患有 30 天或以上慢性嗅觉障碍的患者。主要结果是随访结束时的嗅觉评分。在所有研究中,改善的定义是客观心理物理嗅觉测试结果随时间发生的积极变化。最常用的测试是嗅棒测试。通常,结果测量包括比较平均嗅觉分数。在嗅觉棒测试中,阈值、辨别力和识别力分数的变化达到或超过 5.5 分也表明测试结果有所改善:本次研究共纳入了 14 项研究(1.596 名参与者)。在纳入的研究中,有多达 10 项为研究性临床试验。九项研究评估了辅助治疗和嗅觉训练的综合效果,五项研究仅评估了OT:根据我们的评估,单独进行嗅觉训练可显著改善慢性嗅觉障碍。结论:根据我们的评估,单独进行嗅觉训练可明显改善慢性嗅觉障碍,但要取得更有效的治疗效果,必须采取综合治疗方法。将嗅觉训练与 CoUltraPEALut、脑溶酶和口服维生素 A 等辅助剂相结合,对增强 COVID-19 后的嗅觉功能大有裨益。严格遵守 OT 方案并将 OT 持续时间延长至 3 个月或更长,可显著提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive and cortical network alterations in pediatric temporal lobe space-occupying lesions: an fMRI study. Advancing working memory research through cortico-cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain spatial reconciliation through multisensory integration in the impact of pandemic fatigue on workplace. Cognitive dysfunction in Moyamoya disease: latest developments and future directions. Development and validation of a two-dimensional pseudorandom balance perturbation test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1