Carbon emission trading scheme, investors’ attention, and earnings response coefficients

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102085
Jun Hu , Siyu Zhang , Liang Wang , Daifei Yao
{"title":"Carbon emission trading scheme, investors’ attention, and earnings response coefficients","authors":"Jun Hu ,&nbsp;Siyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Liang Wang ,&nbsp;Daifei Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how the introduction of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) affects investors’ reactions to corporate earnings surprises. We propose two non-exclusive explanations, namely, the preference-based view and the uncertainty-based view, and suggest that the implementation of ETS may influence the magnitude of investor responses to corporate unexpected earnings. Consistent with the preference-based view, by utilizing China’s introduction of ETS as a quasi-natural experiment, we observe a reduction in the earnings response coefficients (ERCs) following the implementation of ETS. We validate this result by showing that the introduction of ETS prompts investors to focus on corporate carbon risk. Cross-sectional tests find that the effect of ETS on ERCs is more pronounced in firms with higher corporate carbon risk exposure, in firms whose investors exhibit greater environmental awareness, in better-developed carbon pilot markets, and in firms with greater exposure to international capital markets, while this impact is mitigated by firms’ non-financial performance. These findings highlight the importance of environmental regulation and market liberalization in influencing investors’ resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102085"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124001513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how the introduction of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) affects investors’ reactions to corporate earnings surprises. We propose two non-exclusive explanations, namely, the preference-based view and the uncertainty-based view, and suggest that the implementation of ETS may influence the magnitude of investor responses to corporate unexpected earnings. Consistent with the preference-based view, by utilizing China’s introduction of ETS as a quasi-natural experiment, we observe a reduction in the earnings response coefficients (ERCs) following the implementation of ETS. We validate this result by showing that the introduction of ETS prompts investors to focus on corporate carbon risk. Cross-sectional tests find that the effect of ETS on ERCs is more pronounced in firms with higher corporate carbon risk exposure, in firms whose investors exhibit greater environmental awareness, in better-developed carbon pilot markets, and in firms with greater exposure to international capital markets, while this impact is mitigated by firms’ non-financial performance. These findings highlight the importance of environmental regulation and market liberalization in influencing investors’ resource allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳排放交易计划、投资者关注度和收益反应系数
本研究探讨了碳排放交易计划(ETS)的引入如何影响投资者对企业盈利意外的反应。我们提出了两种非排他性的解释,即基于偏好的观点和基于不确定性的观点,并认为碳排放交易计划的实施可能会影响投资者对企业意外收益的反应程度。与基于偏好的观点一致,通过将中国引入排放交易计划作为一个准自然实验,我们观察到在排放交易计划实施后,收益反应系数(ERCs)有所下降。我们通过证明排放交易计划的引入促使投资者关注企业的碳风险来验证这一结果。横截面检验发现,排放交易计划对收益反应系数的影响在企业碳风险敞口较高的企业、投资者环保意识较强的企业、碳试点市场发展较好的企业以及国际资本市场敞口较大的企业中更为明显,而企业的非财务业绩则减轻了这种影响。这些发现凸显了环境监管和市场自由化在影响投资者资源配置方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: International trade, financing and investments, and the related cash and credit transactions, have grown at an extremely rapid pace in recent years. The international monetary system has continued to evolve to accommodate the need for foreign-currency denominated transactions and in the process has provided opportunities for its ongoing observation and study. The purpose of the Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money is to publish rigorous, original articles dealing with the international aspects of financial markets, institutions and money. Theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers providing meaningful insights into the subject areas will be considered. The following topic areas, although not exhaustive, are representative of the coverage in this Journal. • International financial markets • International securities markets • Foreign exchange markets • Eurocurrency markets • International syndications • Term structures of Eurocurrency rates • Determination of exchange rates • Information, speculation and parity • Forward rates and swaps • International payment mechanisms • International commercial banking; • International investment banking • Central bank intervention • International monetary systems • Balance of payments.
期刊最新文献
Carbon emission trading scheme, investors’ attention, and earnings response coefficients Global banks and the picking order in internal capital markets: Do locational activity patterns matter? HACKED: Understanding the stock market response to cyberattacks Does climate risk shape firms’ accounting conservatism? Real earnings management and debt choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1