Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112963
Müge Akbağ , Fuat Aydoğdu , Amelia Rizzo
{"title":"Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study","authors":"Müge Akbağ ,&nbsp;Fuat Aydoğdu ,&nbsp;Amelia Rizzo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parental phubbing occurs when parents interrupt and neglect communication with their child by focusing on their smartphones. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive scale for perceived parental phubbing and examine its psychometric properties. The scale was initially developed based on a review of existing research and essays written by secondary school adolescents aged 10–15 years, who represented the target group. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on samples of Turkish adolescents (N<sub>EFA</sub> = 325, N<sub>CFA</sub>=210). EFA identified a 10-item structure with two factors—“interaction interruptions” and “emotional reactions”—which accounted for a significant portion of the total variance in both the Parental Phubbing Scale-Mother (PPS-M) and Father (PPS-F) Forms. CFA confirmed this structure, with both forms demonstrating a good fit. Criterion validity was evaluated through correlations with the short forms of the Smartphone Addiction Scale and UCLA Loneliness Scale, showing positive correlations. Reliability analysis indicated that both Cronbach's <em>α</em> and McDonald's <em>ω</em> coefficients exceeded 0.70 for both the PPS-MF and PPS-FF. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged between 0.70 and 0.82 for both forms. In conclusion, the PPS-MF and PPS-FF are valid and reliable instruments for assessing parental phubbing based on adolescents' perceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 112963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parental phubbing occurs when parents interrupt and neglect communication with their child by focusing on their smartphones. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive scale for perceived parental phubbing and examine its psychometric properties. The scale was initially developed based on a review of existing research and essays written by secondary school adolescents aged 10–15 years, who represented the target group. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on samples of Turkish adolescents (NEFA = 325, NCFA=210). EFA identified a 10-item structure with two factors—“interaction interruptions” and “emotional reactions”—which accounted for a significant portion of the total variance in both the Parental Phubbing Scale-Mother (PPS-M) and Father (PPS-F) Forms. CFA confirmed this structure, with both forms demonstrating a good fit. Criterion validity was evaluated through correlations with the short forms of the Smartphone Addiction Scale and UCLA Loneliness Scale, showing positive correlations. Reliability analysis indicated that both Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients exceeded 0.70 for both the PPS-MF and PPS-FF. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged between 0.70 and 0.82 for both forms. In conclusion, the PPS-MF and PPS-FF are valid and reliable instruments for assessing parental phubbing based on adolescents' perceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为土耳其青少年编制新的父母溺爱量表:有效性和可靠性研究
当父母专注于自己的智能手机而中断或忽视与孩子的交流时,就会出现父母 "窥屏 "现象。本研究旨在开发一个感知父母溺爱的综合量表,并检验其心理测量学特性。量表最初是在对现有研究和代表目标群体的 10-15 岁中学生作文进行回顾的基础上编制的。通过对土耳其青少年样本(NEFA=325,NCFA=210)进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA),对其结构效度进行了评估。EFA 发现了一个包含两个因子--"互动干扰 "和 "情绪反应"--的 10 个项目结构,这两个因子在父母溺爱量表--母亲(PPS-M)和父亲(PPS-F)表格的总方差中占了很大比例。CFA 证实了这一结构,两个量表均显示出良好的拟合度。标准效度是通过与智能手机成瘾量表简表和加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表简表的相关性进行评估的,结果显示两者呈正相关。信度分析表明,PPS-MF 和 PPS-FF 的 Cronbach's α 和 McDonald's ω 系数均超过了 0.70。两种表格的重测可靠性系数介于 0.70 和 0.82 之间。总之,PPS-MF 和 PPS-FF 是基于青少年感知评估父母溺爱的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Personality traits and their role in intimate partner violence recidivism: A 15-year follow-up study within a prison sample Navigating the pitfalls of incivility: The role of resilience in job search behavior Subjectivity in creative self beliefs: A Q-sort analysis Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study Clusters of borderline personality disorder traits and functional life outcomes: A novel person-centered approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1