Ecosystem recovery following post environmental change near an aluminium smelter in Žiar nad Hronom, Slovakia

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107585
Milan Barna , Markéta Chudomelová , Lukáš Alexa , Hana Cigánková , Tomáš Černý , Petr Petřík
{"title":"Ecosystem recovery following post environmental change near an aluminium smelter in Žiar nad Hronom, Slovakia","authors":"Milan Barna ,&nbsp;Markéta Chudomelová ,&nbsp;Lukáš Alexa ,&nbsp;Hana Cigánková ,&nbsp;Tomáš Černý ,&nbsp;Petr Petřík","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a result of aluminium production that started in 1953, the surroundings of the aluminium smelter and foundry in Žiar nad Hronom are among the most polluted areas in Slovakia. Following the introduction of a new technology in 1996, emissions from the plant have decreased significantly, but it is not clear to what extent the ecosystems in the area have recovered and whether they still carry traces of pollution. We have evaluated the recovery process 23 years after the change in technology by analysing the current contamination of the ecosystem around the factory. In 2019, we sampled the soil, herbaceous plants (<em>Arrhenatherum elatius</em> and <em>Artemisia vulgaris</em>), and woody plants (<em>Salix euxina</em>, <em>Alnus glutinosa</em>, and <em>Carpinus betulus</em>) along three transects running in different directions from the smelter and compared our results with those of a study conducted in 1971. Our data indicate that the concentrations of elements differ depending on the plant life form. Some elements accumulated more in trees (light elements, Sr, Ca, Zn, and Mn) whereas others accumulated more in herbs (K, P, Cl, Si, and Cu). A resurvey of vegetation data has shown clear signs of ecosystem recovery. Over the past ∼50 years, soil fluoride contamination has decreased several-fold and the slope of the distance–decay relationship has flattened. As regards plant leaf biomass, the distance–decay relation has faded out or even reversed, but the concentrations of fluorine in leaves further from the source of pollution remain as high as, or even exceed, values measured ∼50 years ago. Although the ecosystem around the plant is recovering from the past pollution, the revitalization process is still ongoing. Most importantly, concentrations of fluorine in plant biomass continue to exceed the health risk limit, and the meadows adjacent to the smelter are still unsuitable for agricultural purposes. Our study shows that ecosystem recovery will be a long-term process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of aluminium production that started in 1953, the surroundings of the aluminium smelter and foundry in Žiar nad Hronom are among the most polluted areas in Slovakia. Following the introduction of a new technology in 1996, emissions from the plant have decreased significantly, but it is not clear to what extent the ecosystems in the area have recovered and whether they still carry traces of pollution. We have evaluated the recovery process 23 years after the change in technology by analysing the current contamination of the ecosystem around the factory. In 2019, we sampled the soil, herbaceous plants (Arrhenatherum elatius and Artemisia vulgaris), and woody plants (Salix euxina, Alnus glutinosa, and Carpinus betulus) along three transects running in different directions from the smelter and compared our results with those of a study conducted in 1971. Our data indicate that the concentrations of elements differ depending on the plant life form. Some elements accumulated more in trees (light elements, Sr, Ca, Zn, and Mn) whereas others accumulated more in herbs (K, P, Cl, Si, and Cu). A resurvey of vegetation data has shown clear signs of ecosystem recovery. Over the past ∼50 years, soil fluoride contamination has decreased several-fold and the slope of the distance–decay relationship has flattened. As regards plant leaf biomass, the distance–decay relation has faded out or even reversed, but the concentrations of fluorine in leaves further from the source of pollution remain as high as, or even exceed, values measured ∼50 years ago. Although the ecosystem around the plant is recovering from the past pollution, the revitalization process is still ongoing. Most importantly, concentrations of fluorine in plant biomass continue to exceed the health risk limit, and the meadows adjacent to the smelter are still unsuitable for agricultural purposes. Our study shows that ecosystem recovery will be a long-term process.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Gully erosion development and the role of vegetation cover in arid area during an extreme flood (Case study: Dashtiari gully, Iran) Ecosystem recovery following post environmental change near an aluminium smelter in Žiar nad Hronom, Slovakia Structural characteristics and spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and below-ground habitat during the long-term succession of ecosystems in mining areas Mutual promotion relationship of ecological base flow and basin wetland restoration in arid areas Enhanced carbon storage in the Sichuan-Yunnan Ecological Barrier Zone: the impact of land use changes driven by ecological engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1