Risk Classification of Food Incidents Using a Risk Evaluation Matrix for Use in Artificial Intelligence-Supported Risk Identification.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Foods Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.3390/foods13223675
Sina Röhrs, Sascha Rohn, Yvonne Pfeifer
{"title":"Risk Classification of Food Incidents Using a Risk Evaluation Matrix for Use in Artificial Intelligence-Supported Risk Identification.","authors":"Sina Röhrs, Sascha Rohn, Yvonne Pfeifer","doi":"10.3390/foods13223675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foodborne illnesses and mortalities persist as a significant global health issue. The <i>World Health Organization</i> estimates that one out of every ten individuals becomes ill following the consumption of contaminated food. However, in the age of digitalization and technological progress, more and more data and data evaluation technologies are available to counteract this problem. A specific challenge in this context is the efficient and beneficial utilization of the continuously increasing volume of data. In pursuit of optimal data utilization, the objective of the present study was to develop a <i>Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis</i> (MCDA)-based assessment scheme to be prospectively implemented into an overall artificial intelligence (AI)-supported database for the autonomous risk categorization of food incident reports. Such additional evaluations might help to identify certain novel or emerging risks by allocating a level of risk prioritization. Ideally, such indications are obtained earlier than an official notification, and therefore, this method can be considered preventive, as the risk is already identified. Our results showed that this approach enables the efficient and time-saving preliminary risk categorization of incident reports, allowing for the rapid identification of relevant reports related to predefined subject areas or inquiries that require further examination. The manual test runs demonstrated practicality, enabling the implementation of the evaluation scheme in AI-supported databases for the autonomous assessment of incident reports. Moreover, it has become evident that increasing the amount of information and evaluation criteria provided to AI notably enhances the precision of risk assessments for individual incident notifications. This will remain an ongoing challenge for the utilization and processing of food safety data in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foodborne illnesses and mortalities persist as a significant global health issue. The World Health Organization estimates that one out of every ten individuals becomes ill following the consumption of contaminated food. However, in the age of digitalization and technological progress, more and more data and data evaluation technologies are available to counteract this problem. A specific challenge in this context is the efficient and beneficial utilization of the continuously increasing volume of data. In pursuit of optimal data utilization, the objective of the present study was to develop a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)-based assessment scheme to be prospectively implemented into an overall artificial intelligence (AI)-supported database for the autonomous risk categorization of food incident reports. Such additional evaluations might help to identify certain novel or emerging risks by allocating a level of risk prioritization. Ideally, such indications are obtained earlier than an official notification, and therefore, this method can be considered preventive, as the risk is already identified. Our results showed that this approach enables the efficient and time-saving preliminary risk categorization of incident reports, allowing for the rapid identification of relevant reports related to predefined subject areas or inquiries that require further examination. The manual test runs demonstrated practicality, enabling the implementation of the evaluation scheme in AI-supported databases for the autonomous assessment of incident reports. Moreover, it has become evident that increasing the amount of information and evaluation criteria provided to AI notably enhances the precision of risk assessments for individual incident notifications. This will remain an ongoing challenge for the utilization and processing of food safety data in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用风险评估矩阵对食品事故进行风险分类,以用于人工智能支持的风险识别。
食源性疾病和死亡一直是一个重大的全球健康问题。据世界卫生组织估计,每十个人中就有一人因食用受污染的食物而患病。然而,在数字化和技术进步的时代,越来越多的数据和数据评估技术可用来应对这一问题。在这种情况下,一个具体的挑战是如何高效、有益地利用不断增加的数据量。为了追求数据的最佳利用,本研究的目标是开发一种基于多标准决策分析(MCDA)的评估方案,并将其前瞻性地应用到人工智能(AI)支持的整体数据库中,以便对食品事故报告进行自主风险分类。这种额外的评估可能有助于通过分配风险优先级来确定某些新的或正在出现的风险。在理想情况下,这种迹象比官方通知更早获得,因此,这种方法可被视为预防性的,因为风险已经被识别出来了。我们的研究结果表明,这种方法能够对事件报告进行高效、省时的初步风险分类,从而快速识别与预定义主题领域或需要进一步检查的查询相关的报告。人工测试运行证明了这一方法的实用性,可以在人工智能支持的数据库中实施评估方案,对事件报告进行自主评估。此外,增加提供给人工智能的信息量和评估标准显然可以提高单个事件通知风险评估的精确度。这仍将是未来利用和处理食品安全数据的一个持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
期刊最新文献
Food Public Opinion Prevention and Control Model Based on Sentiment Analysis. Will Food Safety Incidents Stimulate the Public's Desire for Food Safety Governance? Complexation with Alginate in Pumpkin Leaf Protein Solutions for the Encapsulation of Folic Acid: The Effect of Extraction Protocols. High-Energy Fluidic Microfluidizer Produced Whole Germinant Oat Milk: Effects on Physical Properties and Nutritional Quality. Development of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-Based Species-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays for Authenticating Five Highly Priced Tuna.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1