Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S486170
Pingzhi Wang, Zhengtao Wang, Junyan Zhang, Caiqin Lan, Yani Zhao, Xiaoqing Chen, Yu Li, Qi Mei, Huijing Feng, Shuang Wei, Zhifeng Xue, Fang Gao, Xiaolei Liu, Ying Liang
{"title":"Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Pingzhi Wang, Zhengtao Wang, Junyan Zhang, Caiqin Lan, Yani Zhao, Xiaoqing Chen, Yu Li, Qi Mei, Huijing Feng, Shuang Wei, Zhifeng Xue, Fang Gao, Xiaolei Liu, Ying Liang","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S486170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine its efficacy and safety in reducing treatment failure events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study involving patients with COVID-19 was conducted. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates between the HBOT and non-HBOT groups. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a clinical treatment failure event, defined as all-cause mortality, abandonment of treatment, or transfer to the Intensive Care Unit due to worsening condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 720 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in the study, with 27 patients receiving HBOT and 693 patients not receiving HBOT. The occurrence of treatment failure was significantly lower in the HBOT group compared to the non-HBOT group, with no treatment failure events in the HBOT group versus 36 events in the non-HBOT group. The IPTW database analysis results showed that in comparison to the non-HBOT group, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment failure in the HBOT group was less than 0.001 (95% CI: <0.001 ~ <0.001, p<0.001). Lymphocyte count >0.8×10<sup>9</sup>/L and HBOT was associated with a significantly lower risk of treatment failure. Glucocorticoid use was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. The incidence of venous thrombosis events was significantly higher in the HBOT group compared to the non-HBOT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that adjunctive HBOT significantly reduces the risk of treatment failure in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with satisfactory safety. HBOT shows promise as a beneficial therapy for improving outcomes in COVID-19-infected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5501-5511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S486170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine its efficacy and safety in reducing treatment failure events.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving patients with COVID-19 was conducted. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates between the HBOT and non-HBOT groups. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a clinical treatment failure event, defined as all-cause mortality, abandonment of treatment, or transfer to the Intensive Care Unit due to worsening condition.

Results: A total of 720 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in the study, with 27 patients receiving HBOT and 693 patients not receiving HBOT. The occurrence of treatment failure was significantly lower in the HBOT group compared to the non-HBOT group, with no treatment failure events in the HBOT group versus 36 events in the non-HBOT group. The IPTW database analysis results showed that in comparison to the non-HBOT group, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment failure in the HBOT group was less than 0.001 (95% CI: <0.001 ~ <0.001, p<0.001). Lymphocyte count >0.8×109/L and HBOT was associated with a significantly lower risk of treatment failure. Glucocorticoid use was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. The incidence of venous thrombosis events was significantly higher in the HBOT group compared to the non-HBOT group.

Conclusion: This study revealed that adjunctive HBOT significantly reduces the risk of treatment failure in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with satisfactory safety. HBOT shows promise as a beneficial therapy for improving outcomes in COVID-19-infected patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高压氧疗法对 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的影响:回顾性队列研究
研究目的本研究旨在评估高压氧疗法(HBOT)对 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的影响,并确定其在减少治疗失败事件方面的有效性和安全性:方法: 对 COVID-19 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究采用反向治疗概率加权法(IPTW)平衡 HBOT 组和非 HBOT 组之间的协变量。主要终点是发生临床治疗失败事件,即全因死亡、放弃治疗或因病情恶化转入重症监护室:共有720名COVID-19患者参与了研究,其中27名患者接受了HBOT治疗,693名患者未接受HBOT治疗。与非 HBOT 组相比,HBOT 组治疗失败的发生率明显降低,HBOT 组未发生治疗失败事件,而非 HBOT 组发生了 36 起治疗失败事件。IPTW数据库分析结果显示,与非HBOT组相比,HBOT组治疗失败的危险比(HR)小于0.001(95% CI:0.8×109/L),HBOT与治疗失败风险明显降低相关。使用糖皮质激素与较高的治疗失败风险相关。与非HBOT组相比,HBOT组的静脉血栓事件发生率明显更高:这项研究表明,辅助 HBOT 能明显降低 COVID-19 患者治疗失败的风险,且安全性令人满意。HBOT有望成为改善COVID-19感染者预后的有益疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Transformative Approach to the Detection of Prediabetes. Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Genome Variability for the Development of Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Bibliometric Analysis. Mapping the Future: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1