Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703
Emma Whitfield , Becky White , Matthew E. Barclay , Meena Rafiq , Cristina Renzi , Brian Rous , Spiros Denaxas , Georgios Lyratzopoulos
{"title":"Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data","authors":"Emma Whitfield ,&nbsp;Becky White ,&nbsp;Matthew E. Barclay ,&nbsp;Meena Rafiq ,&nbsp;Cristina Renzi ,&nbsp;Brian Rous ,&nbsp;Spiros Denaxas ,&nbsp;Georgios Lyratzopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Differences in the recording of cancer case status and diagnosis date have been observed between cancer registry (CR) – the reference standard – and electronic health records (EHRs); such differences may affect estimates of cancer risk or misclassify diagnostic pathways. This study aims to quantify differences in recording of case status and date of cancer diagnosis between cancer registry and EHRs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)), secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) and national Cancer Registry (CR) data, were used to identify 14,301 patients with a recorded diagnosis of brain, colon, lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer between 1999 and 2018. Agreement in case status between datasets, differences in recorded diagnosis dates, and change in agreement over time were investigated for each cancer site.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 84 % (ovary) to 92 % (colon) of diagnoses in cancer registry were also recorded in combined CPRD-HES data. Agreement with cancer registry was slightly lower in HES (78 % (ovary) to 86 % (colon)) and CPRD (61 % (ovary, pancreas) to 72 % (brain)). The proportion of CPRD-HES diagnoses confirmed in CR varied by cancer site (50 % (brain) to 86 % (lung)). Agreement between CR and HES was relatively stable within cancer sites over time. Concordance between CR and CPRD was more heterogeneous between cancer sites and over time. Best agreement in diagnosis date was observed between CR and HES (median difference 0 or 1 days, all cancer sites).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Agreement between CR and EHR data is heterogeneous across cancer sites. Concordance does not appear to have improved over time. Combined data from primary and secondary care may be sufficient to approximate case status in CR in some circumstances, but the date we consider to represent the diagnosis may impact study outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782124001826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Differences in the recording of cancer case status and diagnosis date have been observed between cancer registry (CR) – the reference standard – and electronic health records (EHRs); such differences may affect estimates of cancer risk or misclassify diagnostic pathways. This study aims to quantify differences in recording of case status and date of cancer diagnosis between cancer registry and EHRs.

Methods

Linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)), secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) and national Cancer Registry (CR) data, were used to identify 14,301 patients with a recorded diagnosis of brain, colon, lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer between 1999 and 2018. Agreement in case status between datasets, differences in recorded diagnosis dates, and change in agreement over time were investigated for each cancer site.

Results

Between 84 % (ovary) to 92 % (colon) of diagnoses in cancer registry were also recorded in combined CPRD-HES data. Agreement with cancer registry was slightly lower in HES (78 % (ovary) to 86 % (colon)) and CPRD (61 % (ovary, pancreas) to 72 % (brain)). The proportion of CPRD-HES diagnoses confirmed in CR varied by cancer site (50 % (brain) to 86 % (lung)). Agreement between CR and HES was relatively stable within cancer sites over time. Concordance between CR and CPRD was more heterogeneous between cancer sites and over time. Best agreement in diagnosis date was observed between CR and HES (median difference 0 or 1 days, all cancer sites).

Conclusion

Agreement between CR and EHR data is heterogeneous across cancer sites. Concordance does not appear to have improved over time. Combined data from primary and secondary care may be sufficient to approximate case status in CR in some circumstances, but the date we consider to represent the diagnosis may impact study outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国不同数据集癌症诊断记录的差异:一项基于人群的癌症登记、医院和初级保健数据研究
在癌症登记(CR)(参考标准)和电子健康记录(EHRs)之间观察到癌症病例状态和诊断日期记录的差异;这种差异可能会影响癌症风险的估计或对诊断途径的错误分类。本研究旨在量化癌症登记和电子病历在病例状态和癌症诊断日期记录方面的差异。方法使用关联的初级保健(临床实践研究数据链(CPRD))、二级保健(医院发作统计(HES))和国家癌症登记(CR)数据,确定1999年至2018年期间记录诊断为脑癌、结肠癌、肺癌、卵巢癌或胰腺癌的14301例患者。针对每个癌症部位,研究了数据集之间病例状态的一致性、记录诊断日期的差异以及一致性随时间的变化。结果cpr - hes联合数据也记录了癌症登记处84 %(卵巢)至92 %(结肠)的诊断。与癌症登记的一致性在HES(78 %(卵巢)至86 %(结肠))和CPRD(61 %(卵巢、胰腺)至72 %(脑))中稍低。CR中CPRD-HES诊断的比例因癌症部位而异(50% %(脑)至86% %(肺))。随着时间的推移,CR和HES之间的一致性在癌症部位相对稳定。CR和CPRD之间的一致性在不同的癌症部位和不同的时间内更具异质性。CR和HES在诊断日期上最一致(中位差0或1天,所有肿瘤部位)。结论不同癌症部位CR和EHR数据的一致性存在差异。随着时间的推移,一致性似乎没有改善。在某些情况下,来自初级和二级保健的综合数据可能足以估计CR的病例状态,但我们认为代表诊断的日期可能会影响研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
期刊最新文献
Additive interaction and network analysis of co-occurring allergic diseases in relation to cancer risk Endogenous antioxidant biomarkers and cancer risk among men with concurrent smoking and alcohol use: A prospective cohort study Travel time to healthcare facilities and stage at diagnosis and breast cancer-specific mortality: A population-based cohort study from Northern Ireland Predisposing factors for metastatic disease at initial diagnosis of synovial sarcoma: A big data analysis (n = 2162) Advanced adenomas among young endurance runners: A prospective hypothesis-generating prevalence study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1