Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.036
Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Radhwan S Algabri, Abdulrahman S Alamri, Lujain S Alhazmi, Slwan M Almadani, Abdulrahman M Alturkistani, Abdulaziz G Almutairi
{"title":"Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review.","authors":"Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Radhwan S Algabri, Abdulrahman S Alamri, Lujain S Alhazmi, Slwan M Almadani, Abdulrahman M Alturkistani, Abdulaziz G Almutairi","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to accurately forecast the prognosis of dental implants from radiographic images is unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of AI algorithms in predicting implant outcomes by focusing on key factors like peri-implantitis, implant stability, marginal bone levels, dental implant failure, implant success, and osseointegration.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The included studies focused on the radiographic data of patients with dental implants where AI algorithms were compared with expert judgment. A comprehensive search in 4 databases and a manual search were conducted. The quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 424 references, 13 eligible articles were included. These studies used different radiographic types and AI models. AI algorithms showed promising accuracy rates, reaching 99.8%. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 67% to 95% and 78% to 100%, respectively. The studies indicated that AI models significantly reduce analysis time compared with manual methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI algorithms demonstrate promising accuracy in predicting dental implant prognosis, enhancing treatment planning, and early intervention. However, variations in AI models and methodologies highlight the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to accurately forecast the prognosis of dental implants from radiographic images is unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of AI algorithms in predicting implant outcomes by focusing on key factors like peri-implantitis, implant stability, marginal bone levels, dental implant failure, implant success, and osseointegration.

Material and methods: This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The included studies focused on the radiographic data of patients with dental implants where AI algorithms were compared with expert judgment. A comprehensive search in 4 databases and a manual search were conducted. The quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

Results: Of 424 references, 13 eligible articles were included. These studies used different radiographic types and AI models. AI algorithms showed promising accuracy rates, reaching 99.8%. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 67% to 95% and 78% to 100%, respectively. The studies indicated that AI models significantly reduce analysis time compared with manual methods.

Conclusions: AI algorithms demonstrate promising accuracy in predicting dental implant prognosis, enhancing treatment planning, and early intervention. However, variations in AI models and methodologies highlight the need for further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor regarding "Computer guided root tip extraction and implant placement: A clinical report". Validity and reliability of a proposed anterior implant esthetic index (AIEI). Advancements of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting dental implant prognosis from radiographic images: A systematic review. Letter to the Editor regarding, "An up to thirty-year retrospective study on the success and survival of single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns in a dental school setting". Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding, "Computer guided root tip extraction and implant placement: A clinical report".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1