Maltreatment, homicide and access to specialised palliative care among children and young adults with a life-limiting condition: a nationwide population-based study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002571
Shih-Chun Lin, Hsin-Yi Chang, Mei-Chih Huang
{"title":"Maltreatment, homicide and access to specialised palliative care among children and young adults with a life-limiting condition: a nationwide population-based study.","authors":"Shih-Chun Lin, Hsin-Yi Chang, Mei-Chih Huang","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the differences in the rates of maltreatment and homicide deaths between children and young adults with and without a life-limiting condition (LLC) and determined whether this affects the likelihood of receiving specialised palliative care (SPC) services before death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A nationwide retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children and young adults aged 0-25 years with LLCs and maltreatment were identified within the Health and Welfare Data Science Centre by International Classification of Diseases codes. Deaths were included within the Multiple Causes of Death Data if they occurred between 2016 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of maltreatment, homicide deaths and SPC referrals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children and young adults with underlying LLCs experienced a similar rate of maltreatment (2.2 per 10 000 vs 3.1 per 10 000) and had a 68% decrease in the odds of homicide death (19.7% vs 80.3%, OR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.56) than those without such conditions. Among those with LLCs who experienced maltreatment, 14.3% (2 out of 14) had received SPC at least 3 days before death. There was no significant difference in SPC referrals between those who experienced maltreatment and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The likelihood of being referred to SPC was low with no significant statistical differences observed between children and young adults with maltreatment and without. These findings suggest a need for integrating SPC and child protection services to ensure human rights are upheld.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the differences in the rates of maltreatment and homicide deaths between children and young adults with and without a life-limiting condition (LLC) and determined whether this affects the likelihood of receiving specialised palliative care (SPC) services before death.

Design: A nationwide retrospective observational study.

Setting: Taiwan.

Patients: Children and young adults aged 0-25 years with LLCs and maltreatment were identified within the Health and Welfare Data Science Centre by International Classification of Diseases codes. Deaths were included within the Multiple Causes of Death Data if they occurred between 2016 and 2017.

Main outcome measures: Rates of maltreatment, homicide deaths and SPC referrals.

Results: Children and young adults with underlying LLCs experienced a similar rate of maltreatment (2.2 per 10 000 vs 3.1 per 10 000) and had a 68% decrease in the odds of homicide death (19.7% vs 80.3%, OR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.56) than those without such conditions. Among those with LLCs who experienced maltreatment, 14.3% (2 out of 14) had received SPC at least 3 days before death. There was no significant difference in SPC referrals between those who experienced maltreatment and those who did not.

Conclusions: The likelihood of being referred to SPC was low with no significant statistical differences observed between children and young adults with maltreatment and without. These findings suggest a need for integrating SPC and child protection services to ensure human rights are upheld.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有生命限制疾病的儿童和青年中的虐待、杀人和获得专门姑息治疗:一项基于全国人口的研究。
目的:本研究比较了有和没有生命限制条件(LLC)的儿童和年轻人在虐待和他杀死亡率方面的差异,并确定这是否影响死亡前接受专门姑息治疗(SPC)服务的可能性。设计:全国回顾性观察性研究。背景:台湾。患者:在健康和福利数据科学中心内,根据国际疾病分类代码确定患有llc和虐待的0-25岁儿童和青壮年。如果死亡发生在2016年至2017年之间,则将其纳入多种死亡原因数据。主要结果衡量指标:虐待率、他杀死亡率和SPC转诊率。结果:患有潜在llc的儿童和年轻人遭受虐待的比率相似(2.2 / 10000 vs 3.1 / 10000),他杀死亡的几率降低68% (19.7% vs 80.3%, OR, 0.32;95% CI 0.18 ~ 0.56)。在经历过虐待的llc患者中,14.3%(14人中有2人)在死亡前至少3天接受过SPC。在SPC转诊中,经历过虐待的人与没有经历过虐待的人之间没有显著差异。结论:在儿童和青少年中,被提到SPC的可能性很低,没有观察到有虐待和没有虐待的显著统计学差异。这些调查结果表明,需要将SPC和儿童保护服务结合起来,以确保维护人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Surgical management of neuromuscular scoliosis in paediatric patients: experiences from a tertiary centre multidisciplinary team. Development of a core outcome set for paediatric achalasia: a joint ERNICA, ESPGHAN and EUPSA study protocol. Health Hackathon: empowering students as tomorrow's leaders in health. Sepsis beyond bundles: contextualising paediatric care in resource-limited settings through situational analysis. Targeted oxygenation in the respiratory care of premature infants at delivery-effects on outcome: a randomised controlled trial (Torpido 3060) study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1