Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002997
Sharin Baldwin, Michael Fanner, Hilda Beauchamp, Vicky Gilroy, Alison Morton, Carl May, Jane Barlow
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory.","authors":"Sharin Baldwin, Michael Fanner, Hilda Beauchamp, Vicky Gilroy, Alison Morton, Carl May, Jane Barlow","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) is a validated observation tool, designed for use by healthcare practitioners to identify infant social withdrawal. A modified version (m-ADBB) was later developed as a clinically useful behavioural tool. However, neither version has been tested in the UK context. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of using the ADBB and m-ADBB within universal health visiting practice in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods convergent parallel design was used. Five health visitors were trained in the ADBB and 20 in the m-ADBB, from two National Health Service (NHS) community sites in England. Quantitative data were collected from health visitors, while qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with health visitors and service managers, guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and descriptive analysis for the quantitative data. NPT provided a framework for analysing the implementation process in routine health visitor practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The m-ADBB was used with 225 babies and behaviour concerns were identified in 23 babies (10%). Eleven themes were identified, aligned with the four NPT constructs: (1) Coherence: perceived uniqueness of the scale, new vocabulary for articulating baby behaviour, enrichment of existing knowledge and skills; (2) Cognitive participation: commitment to the use of the ADBB/m-ADBB, consolidation of new practice; (3) Collective action: implementation of the m-ADBB scale in routine practice, organisation and management support, existing systems and pathways for children and families and (4) Reflexive monitoring: perceived benefits of integrating the scales in practice, quality assurance for embedding the scales in practice, appraisal of the training and scales in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ADBB/m-ADBB was perceived to have enhanced the health visitors' skills and knowledge in infant observation. The m-ADBB required minimal additional time and was highly acceptable to health visitors. These findings have significant implications for health visiting practice and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) is a validated observation tool, designed for use by healthcare practitioners to identify infant social withdrawal. A modified version (m-ADBB) was later developed as a clinically useful behavioural tool. However, neither version has been tested in the UK context. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of using the ADBB and m-ADBB within universal health visiting practice in England.

Methods: A mixed methods convergent parallel design was used. Five health visitors were trained in the ADBB and 20 in the m-ADBB, from two National Health Service (NHS) community sites in England. Quantitative data were collected from health visitors, while qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with health visitors and service managers, guided by Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and descriptive analysis for the quantitative data. NPT provided a framework for analysing the implementation process in routine health visitor practice.

Results: The m-ADBB was used with 225 babies and behaviour concerns were identified in 23 babies (10%). Eleven themes were identified, aligned with the four NPT constructs: (1) Coherence: perceived uniqueness of the scale, new vocabulary for articulating baby behaviour, enrichment of existing knowledge and skills; (2) Cognitive participation: commitment to the use of the ADBB/m-ADBB, consolidation of new practice; (3) Collective action: implementation of the m-ADBB scale in routine practice, organisation and management support, existing systems and pathways for children and families and (4) Reflexive monitoring: perceived benefits of integrating the scales in practice, quality assurance for embedding the scales in practice, appraisal of the training and scales in practice.

Conclusions: The ADBB/m-ADBB was perceived to have enhanced the health visitors' skills and knowledge in infant observation. The m-ADBB required minimal additional time and was highly acceptable to health visitors. These findings have significant implications for health visiting practice and future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:婴儿惊恐量表(ADBB)是一种经过验证的观察工具,设计用于医护人员识别婴儿的社交退缩。后来又开发了一个修改版(m-ADBB),作为临床上有用的行为工具。然而,这两个版本都没有在英国进行过测试。本研究旨在测试在英国普及健康访视实践中使用 ADBB 和 m-ADBB 的可行性和可接受性:方法:采用混合方法收敛平行设计。来自英格兰两个国民健康服务(NHS)社区站点的 5 名健康访视员接受了 ADBB 培训,20 名接受了 m-ADBB 培训。在规范化过程理论(NPT)的指导下,从健康访视者那里收集了定量数据,同时对健康访视者和服务管理人员进行了半结构化定性访谈。定性数据采用主题分析法,定量数据采用描述分析法。NPT 为分析常规健康访视员实践中的实施过程提供了一个框架:对 225 名婴儿使用了 m-ADBB,发现 23 名婴儿(10%)存在行为问题。共确定了 11 个主题,与 NPT 的四个结构相一致:(1) 一致性:量表的独特性、表达婴儿行为的新词汇、现有知识和技能的丰富;(2) 认知参与:使用 ADBB/m-ADBB 的承诺、新实践的巩固;(3) 集体行动:(3) 集体行动:在日常实践中实施 m-ADBB 量表、组织和管理支持、现有的儿童和家庭系统和途径;(4) 反思性监测:将量表纳入实践的感知效益、将量表纳入实践的质量保证、对培训和量表实践的评估。结论:人们认为ADBB/m-ADBB提高了健康访视员观察婴儿的技能和知识。m-ADBB 所需的额外时间极少,而且非常容易被健康访视员接受。这些发现对健康访视实践和未来研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Dexmedetomidine in neonates: utilisation trends and safety profile over time in a neonatal intensive care unit. Exploring the current usage of and attitudes towards transanastomotic tube (TAT) feeding in infants born with duodenal atresia: a survey of practice in the UK. The impact of climate change on child nutrition in Indonesia: a conceptual framework and scoping review of the available evidence. Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory. Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1