Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376
Jiaxiang Chen, Xiaoli Shi, Wei Hu, Rongmu Lin, Ligang Meng, Changsheng Liang, Xinggang Ma, Liang Xu
{"title":"Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.","authors":"Jiaxiang Chen, Xiaoli Shi, Wei Hu, Rongmu Lin, Ligang Meng, Changsheng Liang, Xinggang Ma, Liang Xu","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preschool children who received sevoflurane anaesthesia were associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation (EA). Studies have shown that a subanaesthetic dose of propofol (1 mg/kg) at the end of inhalational anaesthesia could reduce EA in paediatric patients, but the optimal administrations are still under investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blind trial, 160 preschool children (ASA I or II, 2-5 years old) undergoing day surgery of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups: the control group, single bolus 3 min before the end of the surgery (bolus A), single bolus at the end of the surgery (bolus B) and continuous infusion for 3 min at the end of the surgery (continuous infusion). The dose of propofol in the bolus A group, bolus B group and continued infusion group is 1 mg/kg. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of EA assessed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale and Watcha scales. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, emergence time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of EA was as follows: 65.0% in the control group, 30.0% in the bolus A group, 32.5% in the bolus B group and 5.0% in the continuous infusion group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the peak PAED scores in the continuous infusion group were significantly lower than those in the other groups. However, extubation time and emergence time showed no differences among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous infusion of subanaesthetic dose propofol (1 mg/kg) for 3 min at the end of sevoflurane anaesthesia seems to be more appropriate than other administration as it reduced EA and did not prolong the time to wake.</p><p><strong>Trail registration number: </strong>NCT05420402.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preschool children who received sevoflurane anaesthesia were associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation (EA). Studies have shown that a subanaesthetic dose of propofol (1 mg/kg) at the end of inhalational anaesthesia could reduce EA in paediatric patients, but the optimal administrations are still under investigation.

Methods: In a double-blind trial, 160 preschool children (ASA I or II, 2-5 years old) undergoing day surgery of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups: the control group, single bolus 3 min before the end of the surgery (bolus A), single bolus at the end of the surgery (bolus B) and continuous infusion for 3 min at the end of the surgery (continuous infusion). The dose of propofol in the bolus A group, bolus B group and continued infusion group is 1 mg/kg. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of EA assessed by the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale and Watcha scales. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, emergence time, mean arterial pressure and heart rate.

Results: The incidence of EA was as follows: 65.0% in the control group, 30.0% in the bolus A group, 32.5% in the bolus B group and 5.0% in the continuous infusion group (p<0.05). Furthermore, the peak PAED scores in the continuous infusion group were significantly lower than those in the other groups. However, extubation time and emergence time showed no differences among groups.

Conclusions: Continuous infusion of subanaesthetic dose propofol (1 mg/kg) for 3 min at the end of sevoflurane anaesthesia seems to be more appropriate than other administration as it reduced EA and did not prolong the time to wake.

Trail registration number: NCT05420402.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Dexmedetomidine in neonates: utilisation trends and safety profile over time in a neonatal intensive care unit. Exploring the current usage of and attitudes towards transanastomotic tube (TAT) feeding in infants born with duodenal atresia: a survey of practice in the UK. The impact of climate change on child nutrition in Indonesia: a conceptual framework and scoping review of the available evidence. Feasibility and acceptability of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB) in universal health visiting practice in England: a mixed-methods study using Normalisation Process Theory. Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1