Epidemiology, classification, and treatment of 2084 Lisfranc injuries: An observational study from the Swedish fracture register

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112036
Hans Juto , Sebastian Mukka , Olof Wolf , Michael Möller
{"title":"Epidemiology, classification, and treatment of 2084 Lisfranc injuries: An observational study from the Swedish fracture register","authors":"Hans Juto ,&nbsp;Sebastian Mukka ,&nbsp;Olof Wolf ,&nbsp;Michael Möller","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lisfranc injuries are potentially severe but relatively uncommon. Limited epidemiological data regarding Lisfranc injuries of the midfoot are available. This study aimed to describe the injury's epidemiology, injury mechanism, and primary treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational register study examined all Lisfranc injuries registered in the Swedish Fracture Register from 2013 to 2022. Data on sex, age, date of injury, injury type, injury mechanism, and primary treatment were analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some 2084 Lisfranc injuries in 2079 patients (54 % men) were included in the study. The mean age at injury was 43 (18–92, SD 17.3) years for men and 49 (18–96, SD 17.4) for women. One of five cases were caused by high-energy trauma, and the most common injury mechanism was a simple fall - tripping (31 %). Approximately 39 % of patients underwent operative treatment, with fixation using plates (51 %) being the prevailing choice of treatment. Primary arthrodesis was performed in 11 % of the operatively treated cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lisfranc injuries are the consequence of a broad spectrum of injury mechanisms, are primarily induced by low-energy trauma and found in all age groups in adults. The majority of Lisfranc injuries are treated non-operatively. This comprehension can aid in accurate diagnosis and management in everyday clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Lisfranc injuries are potentially severe but relatively uncommon. Limited epidemiological data regarding Lisfranc injuries of the midfoot are available. This study aimed to describe the injury's epidemiology, injury mechanism, and primary treatment.

Methods

An observational register study examined all Lisfranc injuries registered in the Swedish Fracture Register from 2013 to 2022. Data on sex, age, date of injury, injury type, injury mechanism, and primary treatment were analysed.

Results

Some 2084 Lisfranc injuries in 2079 patients (54 % men) were included in the study. The mean age at injury was 43 (18–92, SD 17.3) years for men and 49 (18–96, SD 17.4) for women. One of five cases were caused by high-energy trauma, and the most common injury mechanism was a simple fall - tripping (31 %). Approximately 39 % of patients underwent operative treatment, with fixation using plates (51 %) being the prevailing choice of treatment. Primary arthrodesis was performed in 11 % of the operatively treated cases.

Conclusions

Lisfranc injuries are the consequence of a broad spectrum of injury mechanisms, are primarily induced by low-energy trauma and found in all age groups in adults. The majority of Lisfranc injuries are treated non-operatively. This comprehension can aid in accurate diagnosis and management in everyday clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2084例Lisfranc损伤的流行病学、分类和治疗:来自瑞典骨折登记的观察性研究
背景:lisfranc损伤可能很严重,但相对罕见。关于中足Lisfranc损伤的流行病学数据有限。本研究旨在描述损伤的流行病学、损伤机制和主要治疗方法。方法一项观察性登记研究检查了2013年至2022年在瑞典骨折登记中登记的所有Lisfranc损伤。对患者的性别、年龄、受伤日期、受伤类型、受伤机制和主要治疗进行分析。结果共纳入2079例患者中2084例Lisfranc损伤,其中男性占54%。男性平均受伤年龄为43岁(18-92岁,SD 17.3),女性平均受伤年龄为49岁(18-96岁,SD 17.4)。5例中有1例是由高能外伤引起的,最常见的损伤机制是简单的绊倒(31%)。大约39%的患者接受手术治疗,使用钢板固定(51%)是主要的治疗选择。11%的手术治疗病例进行了原发性关节融合术。结论骶髂关节损伤是多种损伤机制的结果,主要由低能损伤引起,在所有年龄组的成年人中都有发现。大多数Lisfranc损伤采用非手术治疗。这种理解有助于在日常临床实践中准确诊断和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Alpha (α) assumed rotations and shear strains for spatially isotropic polygonal Reissner-Mindlin plate elements (αARS-Poly)
IF 4.7 2区 工程技术Computers & StructuresPub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106900
Son H. Nguyen , Nguyen N. Nam , Tien-Dat Hoang , Tan N. Nguyen , T. Nguyen-Thoi
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
AO In-Hospital program: A truly novel educational platform for operating room personnel (ORP) and clinicians? Humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures: Fracture patterns differ between short and standard-length arthroplasty stems Interlocking screw backout from a preassembled polymer inlay in a retrograde femoral nail system: A retrospective review The impact of diabetes mellitus on the management and outcome of ankle fractures Surgical treatment of infectious severe calcaneal bone defects in children by the Ilizarov technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1