Quantifying patterns of microbial community assembly processes in bioreactors using different approaches leads to variable results

IF 12.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2024.122903
Savanna K. Smith , Francis L. de los Reyes III
{"title":"Quantifying patterns of microbial community assembly processes in bioreactors using different approaches leads to variable results","authors":"Savanna K. Smith ,&nbsp;Francis L. de los Reyes III","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engineered bioreactors play a vital role in many processes to convert wastes to resources, such as biological wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and conversion of solid waste to methane in landfills. These biological systems rely on communities of microbes to convert waste to valuable resources. A central aspect of the design and operation of bioreactors involves an understanding of microbial community composition and dynamics, including the assembly processes through which they form. However, there remains a significant gap in our fundamental understanding of microbial community dynamics and microbial community assembly (MCA) processes, especially in engineered bioreactor settings. Here, we propose and employ a tool set that can be used by the research community, assess multiple bioreactor systems across a range of process types and ranges, and connect MCA patterns to relevant microbial groups in each bioreactor system. We applied multiple MCA assessment methods using available tools, layering on a trait-based approach, to seven experiments involving different engineered bioreactor systems. The calculated relative contributions of MCA processes varied by the method used, with null modeling approaches estimating a higher influence of stochastic MCA than neutral modeling. While most patterns of MCA were not discernible by general rules, anaerobic generalists assembled more deterministically than anaerobic specialists. Finally, statistical modeling of confidence levels suggests a minimum of 30–40 samples should be used for neutral modeling while a minimum 50–60 samples should be used for null modeling. Overall, we suggest caution when applying and interpreting the results of any one MCA assessment method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"272 ","pages":"Article 122903"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424018037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engineered bioreactors play a vital role in many processes to convert wastes to resources, such as biological wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and conversion of solid waste to methane in landfills. These biological systems rely on communities of microbes to convert waste to valuable resources. A central aspect of the design and operation of bioreactors involves an understanding of microbial community composition and dynamics, including the assembly processes through which they form. However, there remains a significant gap in our fundamental understanding of microbial community dynamics and microbial community assembly (MCA) processes, especially in engineered bioreactor settings. Here, we propose and employ a tool set that can be used by the research community, assess multiple bioreactor systems across a range of process types and ranges, and connect MCA patterns to relevant microbial groups in each bioreactor system. We applied multiple MCA assessment methods using available tools, layering on a trait-based approach, to seven experiments involving different engineered bioreactor systems. The calculated relative contributions of MCA processes varied by the method used, with null modeling approaches estimating a higher influence of stochastic MCA than neutral modeling. While most patterns of MCA were not discernible by general rules, anaerobic generalists assembled more deterministically than anaerobic specialists. Finally, statistical modeling of confidence levels suggests a minimum of 30–40 samples should be used for neutral modeling while a minimum 50–60 samples should be used for null modeling. Overall, we suggest caution when applying and interpreting the results of any one MCA assessment method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同的方法定量生物反应器中微生物群落组装过程的模式导致不同的结果
工程生物反应器在将废物转化为资源的许多过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,例如生物废水处理,生物修复以及垃圾填埋场固体废物转化为甲烷。这些生物系统依靠微生物群落将废物转化为有价值的资源。生物反应器设计和操作的一个核心方面涉及对微生物群落组成和动力学的理解,包括它们形成的组装过程。然而,我们对微生物群落动力学和微生物群落组装(MCA)过程的基本理解仍然存在重大差距,特别是在工程生物反应器设置中。在这里,我们提出并采用了一套可以被研究界使用的工具集,在一系列工艺类型和范围内评估多个生物反应器系统,并将MCA模式与每个生物反应器系统中的相关微生物群联系起来。我们使用可用的工具,在基于特征的方法上分层,对涉及不同工程生物反应器系统的七个实验应用了多种MCA评估方法。计算出的MCA过程的相对贡献因使用的方法而异,零建模方法估计随机MCA的影响高于中性建模。虽然大多数MCA的模式不能被一般规则所识别,但厌氧通才比厌氧专家更确定地聚集在一起。最后,置信水平的统计建模表明,中性建模应使用至少30-40个样本,而零建模应使用至少50-60个样本。总的来说,我们建议在应用和解释任何一种MCA评估方法的结果时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
期刊最新文献
FIND Parallel: A parallel numerical solver for large-scale simulations of cross-scale spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane channels Sulfur disproportionation in engineered environmental systems: A critical review of mechanisms, applications, and emerging perspectives Storage and soil depth, in addition to wastewater treatment, govern microbiota, and mobile genetic element and antibiotic resistance markers during reclaimed water irrigation Switch-like effects and regulatory mechanisms of DSF-mediated quorum sensing in wastewater biofilm behaviors Electrochemical enhancement of sulfite-induced phosphate release from iron phosphate with concurrent micropollutant degradation in water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1