Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Health Psychology Report Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/185302
Urszula Ziętalewicz, Kamilla Bargiel-Matusiewicz
{"title":"Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Urszula Ziętalewicz, Kamilla Bargiel-Matusiewicz","doi":"10.5114/hpr/185302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the leading causes of a reduction in the quality of life (QoL). Various methods effectively improve patients' performance and coping with their symptoms in the short term. The lack of focus on psychological factors, thus overlooking an important element of the holistic model, may result in the modest long-term improvement. The present study aimed to test the relationships between the variables in Wilson and Cleary's QoL model in a CLBP group and to compare them to a nonpain group.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>Data were obtained from 177 people with CLBP and 160 nonpain participants. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which a multi-module self-administered questionnaire examining biological factors, personality traits, personal values, body assessment, symptoms of depression and anxiety, functional status, general perception of health, life satisfaction, received social support, economic support, satisfaction of health care and sociodemographic factors was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression models were able to explain 48.4% of the variance of QoL in the CLBP group and 30.9% in the nonpain group. Statistically significant predictors in the CLBP model were the severity of anxiety, emotional stability, receiving social support, and general health assessment and emotional stability in the nonpain group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study has enabled an initial exploratory analysis of the Wilson and Cleary model in a CLBP group. The list of factors determining the QoL should be extended to include emotional stability, social and economic support. Further research is needed to explain the relationships between variables in the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"12 4","pages":"337-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/185302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the leading causes of a reduction in the quality of life (QoL). Various methods effectively improve patients' performance and coping with their symptoms in the short term. The lack of focus on psychological factors, thus overlooking an important element of the holistic model, may result in the modest long-term improvement. The present study aimed to test the relationships between the variables in Wilson and Cleary's QoL model in a CLBP group and to compare them to a nonpain group.

Participants and procedure: Data were obtained from 177 people with CLBP and 160 nonpain participants. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which a multi-module self-administered questionnaire examining biological factors, personality traits, personal values, body assessment, symptoms of depression and anxiety, functional status, general perception of health, life satisfaction, received social support, economic support, satisfaction of health care and sociodemographic factors was adopted.

Results: Multiple regression models were able to explain 48.4% of the variance of QoL in the CLBP group and 30.9% in the nonpain group. Statistically significant predictors in the CLBP model were the severity of anxiety, emotional stability, receiving social support, and general health assessment and emotional stability in the nonpain group.

Conclusions: The study has enabled an initial exploratory analysis of the Wilson and Cleary model in a CLBP group. The list of factors determining the QoL should be extended to include emotional stability, social and economic support. Further research is needed to explain the relationships between variables in the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性腰痛患者的生活质量模型。
背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)是降低生活质量(QoL)的主要原因之一。各种方法在短期内有效地改善患者的表现和应对症状。缺乏对心理因素的关注,从而忽视了整体模式的一个重要因素,可能导致适度的长期改善。本研究旨在测试CLBP组中Wilson和Cleary的生活质量模型中变量之间的关系,并将其与非疼痛组进行比较。参与者和程序:数据来自177名CLBP患者和160名非疼痛参与者。我们进行了一项横断面研究,采用多模块自评问卷,考察生物因素、人格特征、个人价值观、身体评估、抑郁和焦虑症状、功能状态、总体健康感知、生活满意度、获得的社会支持、经济支持、卫生保健满意度和社会人口因素。结果:多元回归模型能解释CLBP组生活质量方差的48.4%,非疼痛组生活质量方差的30.9%。在CLBP模型中,有统计学意义的预测因子是非疼痛组的焦虑严重程度、情绪稳定性、接受社会支持、一般健康评估和情绪稳定性。结论:本研究对CLBP组的Wilson和Cleary模型进行了初步的探索性分析。决定生活质量的因素清单应扩大到包括情绪稳定、社会和经济支持。需要进一步的研究来解释模型中变量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer patients' sense of coherence - psycho-oncological consultations and therapeutic alliance as salutogenic factors. Short-term effectiveness of music therapy songwriting for mental health outcomes of at-risk parents in the NICU: a study protocol of an international multicenter mixed-methods trial. Psychological factors and health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia patients. Self-reported health profiles of trauma victims with and without psychiatric histories. Model of quality of life in a group of people with chronic low back pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1