Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements.

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340
Lawson David Gillespie, Sébastien Ars, Samantha Alkadri, Siyar Urya, Timothy Khoo, Susan Fraser, Felix Vogel, Debra Wunch
{"title":"Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements.","authors":"Lawson David Gillespie, Sébastien Ars, Samantha Alkadri, Siyar Urya, Timothy Khoo, Susan Fraser, Felix Vogel, Debra Wunch","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements.<i>Implications:</i> We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements.Implications: We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
期刊最新文献
Recycling electroplating sludge as an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of ciprofloxacin in aqueous solution. Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements. Enhancement of wheat straw pellet quality for bioenergy through additive blending. Incorporation of RLINE into AERMOD: An update and evaluation for mobile source applications. Incorporating meander to account for the impact of low winds in area source modeling; AERMOD as a case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1