Leaf carbon-based constituents of temperate forest species retrieved using PROSPECT-PRO

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110337
Alejandra Torres-Rodriguez , Roshanak Darvishzadeh , Andrew K. Skidmore , Tiejun Wang , Boelo Schuur
{"title":"Leaf carbon-based constituents of temperate forest species retrieved using PROSPECT-PRO","authors":"Alejandra Torres-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Roshanak Darvishzadeh ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Skidmore ,&nbsp;Tiejun Wang ,&nbsp;Boelo Schuur","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The retrieval of leaf carbon-based constituents of vegetation species and their separation from the overall leaf mass per area using radiative transfer models was historically challenging, until the recent re-calibration of the PROSPECT-PRO model. Nevertheless, it remains unexplored for temperate tree species. This study evaluated the retrieval of carbon-based constituents of fresh leaf samples from four European temperate tree species using the PROSPECT-PRO model. We collected a comprehensive dataset of 249 fresh leaf samples obtained from the top canopy of temperate forest species in Germany and the Netherlands. Measurements of the carbon-based constituents were conducted in the lab using a novel customisation of the traditional method, and the spectral measurements of leaf samples were obtained with the ASD FieldSpec-3 and integrating sphere. Employing a look-up table approach, the PROSPECT-PRO model was inverted across the 800 to 2400 nm wavelength range, and the model was also applied with optimal bands selected for leaf carbon-based constituents. The retrieval of carbon-based constituents yielded reasonable accuracy for the four species: European beech (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53, NRMSE = 0.36), English oak (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45, NRMSE = 0.34), Scots pine (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.63, NRMSE = 0.36) and Norway spruce (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62, NRMSE = 0.26). Slight improvements were observed in the retrieval accuracies with the identified optimal spectral bands. As such, the NRMSE values decreased by 0.03 and 0.05 for European beech and English oak; however, they slightly worsened for Norway spruce and Scots pine by 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. This study highlights the effect of considering individual constituents in laboratory measurements and during the calibration of absorption coefficients within the model. This could have a more substantial influence on the retrieval accuracy of carbon-based constituents than the influence of water interference or solely applying optimal spectral bands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110337"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004507","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The retrieval of leaf carbon-based constituents of vegetation species and their separation from the overall leaf mass per area using radiative transfer models was historically challenging, until the recent re-calibration of the PROSPECT-PRO model. Nevertheless, it remains unexplored for temperate tree species. This study evaluated the retrieval of carbon-based constituents of fresh leaf samples from four European temperate tree species using the PROSPECT-PRO model. We collected a comprehensive dataset of 249 fresh leaf samples obtained from the top canopy of temperate forest species in Germany and the Netherlands. Measurements of the carbon-based constituents were conducted in the lab using a novel customisation of the traditional method, and the spectral measurements of leaf samples were obtained with the ASD FieldSpec-3 and integrating sphere. Employing a look-up table approach, the PROSPECT-PRO model was inverted across the 800 to 2400 nm wavelength range, and the model was also applied with optimal bands selected for leaf carbon-based constituents. The retrieval of carbon-based constituents yielded reasonable accuracy for the four species: European beech (R2 = 0.53, NRMSE = 0.36), English oak (R2 = 0.45, NRMSE = 0.34), Scots pine (R2 = 0.63, NRMSE = 0.36) and Norway spruce (R2 = 0.62, NRMSE = 0.26). Slight improvements were observed in the retrieval accuracies with the identified optimal spectral bands. As such, the NRMSE values decreased by 0.03 and 0.05 for European beech and English oak; however, they slightly worsened for Norway spruce and Scots pine by 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. This study highlights the effect of considering individual constituents in laboratory measurements and during the calibration of absorption coefficients within the model. This could have a more substantial influence on the retrieval accuracy of carbon-based constituents than the influence of water interference or solely applying optimal spectral bands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用PROSPECT-PRO检索温带森林树种叶片碳基成分
利用辐射传输模型检索植被物种的叶片碳基成分及其与每面积总体叶片质量的分离在历史上一直具有挑战性,直到最近对PROSPECT-PRO模型进行了重新校准。然而,温带树种仍未被探索过。本研究利用PROSPECT-PRO模型对四种欧洲温带树种鲜叶样品的碳基成分进行了评价。本文收集了来自德国和荷兰的温带森林物种的249个新鲜叶片样本。碳基成分的测量在实验室中进行,使用一种新的定制的传统方法,并使用ASD FieldSpec-3和积分球获得叶片样品的光谱测量。采用查找表法,对PROSPECT-PRO模型在800 ~ 2400 nm波长范围内进行了反演,并对叶片碳基成分选择了最佳波段。对欧洲山毛榉(R2 = 0.53, NRMSE = 0.36)、英国橡木(R2 = 0.45, NRMSE = 0.34)、苏格兰松(R2 = 0.63, NRMSE = 0.36)和挪威云杉(R2 = 0.62, NRMSE = 0.26) 4种树种的碳基成分检索结果具有合理的准确性。在确定最佳光谱波段后,检索精度略有提高。因此,欧洲山毛榉和英国橡树的NRMSE值分别降低了0.03和0.05;然而,挪威云杉和苏格兰松的情况略有恶化,分别为0.05和0.01。本研究强调了在实验室测量和模型内吸收系数校准期间考虑单个成分的影响。这对碳基成分检索精度的影响可能比水干扰或单独应用最佳光谱带的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Deep percolation and soil water dynamics under different sand-fixing vegetation types in two different precipitation regions in semiarid sandy Land, Northern China Evaluating the sensitivity of vegetation indices to leaf area index variability at individual tree level using multispectral drone acquisitions Global vegetation vulnerability to drought is underestimated due to the lagged effect Rice yield stability and its determinants across different rice-cropping systems in China Robust filling of extra-long gaps in eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements from a temperate deciduous forest using eXtreme Gradient Boosting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1