A multimodal Neuroimaging-Based risk score for mild cognitive impairment

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING Neuroimage-Clinical Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103719
Elaheh Zendehrouh , Mohammad S.E. Sendi , Anees Abrol , Ishaan Batta , Reihaneh Hassanzadeh , Vince D. Calhoun
{"title":"A multimodal Neuroimaging-Based risk score for mild cognitive impairment","authors":"Elaheh Zendehrouh ,&nbsp;Mohammad S.E. Sendi ,&nbsp;Anees Abrol ,&nbsp;Ishaan Batta ,&nbsp;Reihaneh Hassanzadeh ,&nbsp;Vince D. Calhoun","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most prevalent age-related dementia, leads to significant cognitive decline. While genetic risk factors and neuroimaging biomarkers have been extensively studied, establishing a neuroimaging-based metric to assess AD risk has received less attention. This study introduces the Brain-wide Risk Score (BRS), a novel approach using multimodal neuroimaging data to assess the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to AD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants from the OASIS-3 cohort (<em>N</em> = 1,389) were categorized into control (CN) and MCI groups. Structural MRI (sMRI) data provided gray matter (GM) segmentation maps, while resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data yielded functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices via spatially constrained independent component analysis. Similar imaging features were computed from the UK Biobank (<em>N</em> = 37,780). The BRS was calculated by comparing each participant’s neuroimaging features to the difference between average features of CN and MCI groups. Both GM and FNC features were used. The BRS effectively differentiated CN from MCI individuals within OASIS-3 and in an independent dataset from the ADNI cohort (<em>N</em> = 729), demonstrating its ability to identify MCI risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Unimodal analysis revealed that sMRI provided greater differentiation than fMRI, consistent with prior research. Using the multimodal BRS, we identified two distinct groups: one with high MCI risk (negative GM and FNC BRS) and another with low MCI risk (positive GM and FNC BRS). Additionally, 46 UK Biobank participants diagnosed with AD showed FNC and GM patterns similar to the high-risk groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Validation using the ADNI dataset confirmed our results, highlighting the potential of FNC and sMRI-based BRS in early Alzheimer’s detection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 103719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most prevalent age-related dementia, leads to significant cognitive decline. While genetic risk factors and neuroimaging biomarkers have been extensively studied, establishing a neuroimaging-based metric to assess AD risk has received less attention. This study introduces the Brain-wide Risk Score (BRS), a novel approach using multimodal neuroimaging data to assess the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to AD.

Methods

Participants from the OASIS-3 cohort (N = 1,389) were categorized into control (CN) and MCI groups. Structural MRI (sMRI) data provided gray matter (GM) segmentation maps, while resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data yielded functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices via spatially constrained independent component analysis. Similar imaging features were computed from the UK Biobank (N = 37,780). The BRS was calculated by comparing each participant’s neuroimaging features to the difference between average features of CN and MCI groups. Both GM and FNC features were used. The BRS effectively differentiated CN from MCI individuals within OASIS-3 and in an independent dataset from the ADNI cohort (N = 729), demonstrating its ability to identify MCI risk.

Results

Unimodal analysis revealed that sMRI provided greater differentiation than fMRI, consistent with prior research. Using the multimodal BRS, we identified two distinct groups: one with high MCI risk (negative GM and FNC BRS) and another with low MCI risk (positive GM and FNC BRS). Additionally, 46 UK Biobank participants diagnosed with AD showed FNC and GM patterns similar to the high-risk groups.

Conclusion

Validation using the ADNI dataset confirmed our results, highlighting the potential of FNC and sMRI-based BRS in early Alzheimer’s detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度认知障碍的多模态神经影像学风险评分。
简介:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的与年龄相关的痴呆症,可导致显著的认知能力下降。虽然遗传风险因素和神经影像学生物标志物已被广泛研究,但建立基于神经影像学的指标来评估AD风险却很少受到关注。本研究引入了全脑风险评分(BRS),这是一种使用多模态神经成像数据来评估轻度认知障碍(MCI)风险的新方法,轻度认知障碍是AD的前兆。方法:将OASIS-3队列(N = 1389)的参与者分为对照(CN)组和MCI组。结构MRI (sMRI)数据提供灰质(GM)分割图,而静息状态功能MRI (fMRI)数据通过空间约束的独立成分分析产生功能网络连接(FNC)矩阵。从UK Biobank (N = 37,780)计算了类似的成像特征。BRS是通过比较每个参与者的神经影像学特征与CN组和MCI组平均特征之间的差异来计算的。同时使用GM和FNC特征。BRS在绿洲-3和来自ADNI队列(N = 729)的独立数据集中有效地将CN与MCI个体区分开来,证明了其识别MCI风险的能力。结果:单峰分析显示sMRI比fMRI提供更大的分化,与先前的研究一致。使用多模式BRS,我们确定了两个不同的组:一组具有高MCI风险(阴性GM和FNC BRS),另一组具有低MCI风险(阳性GM和FNC BRS)。此外,46名被诊断为AD的英国生物银行参与者显示出与高危人群相似的FNC和GM模式。结论:ADNI数据集的验证证实了我们的结果,突出了FNC和基于smri的BRS在早期阿尔茨海默病检测中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
期刊最新文献
A multimodal Neuroimaging-Based risk score for mild cognitive impairment Atypical oscillatory and aperiodic signatures of visual sampling in developmental dyslexia Normative modeling of brain MRI data identifies small subcortical volumes and associations with cognitive function in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) Sex hormones shape EEG-based functional connectivity in early-stage Parkinson’s disease patients Mechanisms underlying the spontaneous reorganization of depression network after stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1