Normative modeling of brain MRI data identifies small subcortical volumes and associations with cognitive function in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD)

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING Neuroimage-Clinical Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103722
Blake A. Gimbel , Donovan J. Roediger , Mary E. Anthony , Abigail M. Ernst , Kent A. Tuominen , Bryon A. Mueller , Erik de Water , Madeline N. Rockhold , CIFASD, Jeffrey R. Wozniak
{"title":"Normative modeling of brain MRI data identifies small subcortical volumes and associations with cognitive function in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD)","authors":"Blake A. Gimbel ,&nbsp;Donovan J. Roediger ,&nbsp;Mary E. Anthony ,&nbsp;Abigail M. Ernst ,&nbsp;Kent A. Tuominen ,&nbsp;Bryon A. Mueller ,&nbsp;Erik de Water ,&nbsp;Madeline N. Rockhold ,&nbsp;CIFASD,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Wozniak","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To quantify regional subcortical brain volume anomalies in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), assess the relative sensitivity and specificity of abnormal volumes in FASD vs. a comparison group, and examine associations with cognitive function.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants: 47 children with FASD and 39 typically-developing comparison participants, ages 8–17 years, who completed physical evaluations, cognitive and behavioral testing, and an MRI brain scan. A large normative MRI dataset that controlled for sex, age, and intracranial volume was used to quantify the developmental status of 7 bilateral subcortical regional volumes. Z-scores were calculated based on volumetric differences from the normative sample. T-tests compared subcortical volumes across groups. Percentages of atypical volumes are reported as are sensitivity and specificity in discriminating groups. Lastly, Pearson correlations examined the relationships between subcortical volumes and neurocognitive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants with FASD demonstrated lower mean volumes across a majority of subcortical regions relative to the comparison group with prominent group differences in the bilateral hippocampi and bilateral caudate. More individuals with FASD (89%) had one or more abnormally small volume compared to 72% of the comparison group. The bilateral hippocampi, bilateral putamen, and right pallidum were most sensitive in discriminating those with FASD from the comparison group. Exploratory analyses revealed associations between subcortical volumes and cognitive functioning that differed across groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this sample, youth with FASD had a greater number of atypically small subcortical volumes than individuals without FASD. Findings suggest MRI may have utility in identifying individuals with structural brain anomalies resulting from PAE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 103722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To quantify regional subcortical brain volume anomalies in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), assess the relative sensitivity and specificity of abnormal volumes in FASD vs. a comparison group, and examine associations with cognitive function.

Method

Participants: 47 children with FASD and 39 typically-developing comparison participants, ages 8–17 years, who completed physical evaluations, cognitive and behavioral testing, and an MRI brain scan. A large normative MRI dataset that controlled for sex, age, and intracranial volume was used to quantify the developmental status of 7 bilateral subcortical regional volumes. Z-scores were calculated based on volumetric differences from the normative sample. T-tests compared subcortical volumes across groups. Percentages of atypical volumes are reported as are sensitivity and specificity in discriminating groups. Lastly, Pearson correlations examined the relationships between subcortical volumes and neurocognitive performance.

Results

Participants with FASD demonstrated lower mean volumes across a majority of subcortical regions relative to the comparison group with prominent group differences in the bilateral hippocampi and bilateral caudate. More individuals with FASD (89%) had one or more abnormally small volume compared to 72% of the comparison group. The bilateral hippocampi, bilateral putamen, and right pallidum were most sensitive in discriminating those with FASD from the comparison group. Exploratory analyses revealed associations between subcortical volumes and cognitive functioning that differed across groups.

Conclusion

In this sample, youth with FASD had a greater number of atypically small subcortical volumes than individuals without FASD. Findings suggest MRI may have utility in identifying individuals with structural brain anomalies resulting from PAE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑MRI数据的规范建模识别出患有胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)的青少年皮质下体积小,与认知功能相关。
目的:量化青少年胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)的区域皮质下脑容量异常,评估FASD与对照组相比异常脑容量的相对敏感性和特异性,并检查其与认知功能的关系。方法:参与者:47名FASD儿童和39名正常发展的参与者,年龄8-17岁,完成了身体评估,认知和行为测试以及MRI脑部扫描。一个大型的规范MRI数据集控制了性别、年龄和颅内体积,用于量化7个双侧皮质下区域体积的发育状态。z分数是根据与标准样本的体积差异计算的。t检验比较各组皮质下体积。报告了非典型体积的百分比,以及区分组的敏感性和特异性。最后,Pearson相关性检验了皮层下体积和神经认知表现之间的关系。结果:与对照组相比,FASD参与者在大部分皮质下区域的平均体积较低,双侧海马和双侧尾状体的组间差异显著。与对照组的72%相比,更多的FASD患者(89%)有一个或多个异常的小体积。双侧海马区、双侧壳核区和右侧苍白质区对FASD患者的区分最为敏感。探索性分析揭示了皮层下体积与认知功能之间的关联,在不同的组中存在差异。结论:在这个样本中,患有FASD的年轻人比没有FASD的人有更多的非典型的小皮质下体积。研究结果表明,MRI可能有助于识别PAE导致的脑结构异常个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
期刊最新文献
A multimodal Neuroimaging-Based risk score for mild cognitive impairment Atypical oscillatory and aperiodic signatures of visual sampling in developmental dyslexia Normative modeling of brain MRI data identifies small subcortical volumes and associations with cognitive function in youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) Sex hormones shape EEG-based functional connectivity in early-stage Parkinson’s disease patients Mechanisms underlying the spontaneous reorganization of depression network after stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1