Pelvic fractures and thoracolumbar spine injury: A critical overlook in high-impact vehicular trauma management

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112050
Zachary A. Mohs , Nathaniel Albrecht , Anthony J. Duncan , Li Cao , Mentor Ahmeti
{"title":"Pelvic fractures and thoracolumbar spine injury: A critical overlook in high-impact vehicular trauma management","authors":"Zachary A. Mohs ,&nbsp;Nathaniel Albrecht ,&nbsp;Anthony J. Duncan ,&nbsp;Li Cao ,&nbsp;Mentor Ahmeti","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pelvic fractures (PF) occur in up to 9 % of trauma cases, primarily from high-impact events, and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to frequent concomitant injuries. Thoracolumbar (TL) spinal fractures, particularly at the T10-L2 junction, are also common in high-energy trauma but are less frequently examined in association with PF. Missed TL fractures can lead to serious neurological deficits. Although Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) recommends screening for TL fractures in trauma patients, no standardized guidelines exist. This study aims to explore the relationship between PF and TL fractures in trauma patients and to identify key variables associated with these injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), focusing on patients with PF resulting from high-impact blunt trauma. Patients were identified using ICD-9 codes for pelvic fractures, and those under 18 years of age or with penetrating trauma were excluded. We collected demographic data, injury grading (Injury Severity Score [ISS], Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS]), and patient outcomes, comparing those with isolated pelvic fractures (IPF) to those with concomitant pelvic and TL fractures (PTLF).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 37,987 patients with PF, 32.4 % (n = 12,318) had concomitant TL fractures. PTLF patients were older (mean age 44.12 vs. 40.12 years, p &lt; 0.001) and exhibited higher ISS and AIS scores compared to IPF patients. The PTLF group had longer hospital stays (14.51 days vs. 9.4 days, p &lt; 0.001) and higher rates of ICU admission (41.4 % vs. 24.0 %, p &lt; 0.001) and mortality (9.5 % vs. 4.3 %, p &lt; 0.001). PTLF patients were less likely to be discharged home (29.5 % vs. 43.5 %, p &lt; 0.001) and more likely to be transferred to rehabilitation or long-term care facilities. Motor vehicle collisions were the most common mechanism of injury, but auto-pedestrian accidents were more frequent in the PTLF group (17.3 % vs. 11.1 %, p &lt; 0.001). Lumbar spine fractures accounted for 70.2 % of TL injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pelvic fractures from high-impact trauma are strongly associated with concomitant TL fractures, which lead to worse clinical outcomes. Routine TL spine screening in these patients is recommended to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic fractures (PF) occur in up to 9 % of trauma cases, primarily from high-impact events, and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to frequent concomitant injuries. Thoracolumbar (TL) spinal fractures, particularly at the T10-L2 junction, are also common in high-energy trauma but are less frequently examined in association with PF. Missed TL fractures can lead to serious neurological deficits. Although Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) recommends screening for TL fractures in trauma patients, no standardized guidelines exist. This study aims to explore the relationship between PF and TL fractures in trauma patients and to identify key variables associated with these injuries.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), focusing on patients with PF resulting from high-impact blunt trauma. Patients were identified using ICD-9 codes for pelvic fractures, and those under 18 years of age or with penetrating trauma were excluded. We collected demographic data, injury grading (Injury Severity Score [ISS], Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS]), and patient outcomes, comparing those with isolated pelvic fractures (IPF) to those with concomitant pelvic and TL fractures (PTLF).

Results

Of the 37,987 patients with PF, 32.4 % (n = 12,318) had concomitant TL fractures. PTLF patients were older (mean age 44.12 vs. 40.12 years, p < 0.001) and exhibited higher ISS and AIS scores compared to IPF patients. The PTLF group had longer hospital stays (14.51 days vs. 9.4 days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of ICU admission (41.4 % vs. 24.0 %, p < 0.001) and mortality (9.5 % vs. 4.3 %, p < 0.001). PTLF patients were less likely to be discharged home (29.5 % vs. 43.5 %, p < 0.001) and more likely to be transferred to rehabilitation or long-term care facilities. Motor vehicle collisions were the most common mechanism of injury, but auto-pedestrian accidents were more frequent in the PTLF group (17.3 % vs. 11.1 %, p < 0.001). Lumbar spine fractures accounted for 70.2 % of TL injuries.

Conclusion

Pelvic fractures from high-impact trauma are strongly associated with concomitant TL fractures, which lead to worse clinical outcomes. Routine TL spine screening in these patients is recommended to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨盆骨折和胸腰椎损伤:在高冲击车辆创伤管理中一个关键的疏忽。
导读:骨盆骨折(PF)发生在高达9%的创伤病例中,主要来自高冲击事件,并且由于频繁的伴随损伤而增加发病率和死亡率。胸腰段(TL)脊柱骨折,尤其是在T10-L2连接处,在高能创伤中也很常见,但与PF相关的检查较少。遗漏的TL骨折可导致严重的神经功能障碍。虽然高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)建议对创伤患者进行TL骨折筛查,但没有标准化的指南。本研究旨在探讨创伤患者PF和TL骨折之间的关系,并确定与这些损伤相关的关键变量。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了来自2021年国家创伤数据库(NTDB)的数据,重点关注高冲击钝性创伤导致的PF患者。使用ICD-9编码识别骨盆骨折患者,排除年龄在18岁以下或有穿透性创伤的患者。我们收集了人口统计学数据、损伤分级(损伤严重程度评分[ISS]、简易损伤量表[AIS])和患者结局,比较了孤立性骨盆骨折(IPF)和伴发骨盆和髋部骨折(PTLF)的患者。结果:在37,987例PF患者中,32.4% (n = 12,318)合并TL骨折。与IPF患者相比,PTLF患者年龄更大(平均年龄44.12岁比40.12岁,p < 0.001), ISS和AIS评分更高。PTLF组住院时间较长(14.51天比9.4天,p < 0.001), ICU住院率(41.4%比24.0%,p < 0.001)和死亡率(9.5%比4.3%,p < 0.001)较高。PTLF患者出院回家的可能性较小(29.5%比43.5%,p < 0.001),更有可能转移到康复或长期护理机构。机动车碰撞是最常见的伤害机制,但汽车行人事故在PTLF组更频繁(17.3%比11.1%,p < 0.001)。腰椎骨折占TL损伤的70.2%。结论:高冲击性骨盆骨折与伴发胫韧带骨折密切相关,胫韧带骨折会导致较差的临床预后。建议对这些患者进行常规TL脊柱筛查,以确保及时诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Modeling, experiment, and validation of a piglet head Epidemiology and outcomes of severe injury patients related to suicide attempt or self-harm in Korea: Nationwide community-based study, 2016–2020 Nanosphere hydrogel-mediated delivery of miR-34a-5p improves achilles tendon function in rat model Pelvic fractures and thoracolumbar spine injury: A critical overlook in high-impact vehicular trauma management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1