Patient experiences with person-centred and integrated chronic care, focussing on patients with low socioeconomic status: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0400
Hester van Bommel, Lena H A Raaijmakers, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Tjard Schermer, Jako S Burgers, Tessa van Loenen, Erik Bischoff
{"title":"Patient experiences with person-centred and integrated chronic care, focussing on patients with low socioeconomic status: a qualitative study.","authors":"Hester van Bommel, Lena H A Raaijmakers, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Tjard Schermer, Jako S Burgers, Tessa van Loenen, Erik Bischoff","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>effectiveness of single disease management programs (DMP) in general practice may be limited for patients with low socioeconomic status (SES), as DMPs insufficiently take into account the specific problems and needs of this population. A Person-Centred Integrated Care (PC-IC) approach focusing on patient's needs could address these problems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to explore experiences of patients with (multiple) chronic diseases with regard to the acceptability of a general practice-based PC-IC approach, with a focus on patients with low SES, and to establish which modifications are needed to tailor the approach to this group.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>in 2021, a 6 month feasibility study in seven general practices in the Netherlands was carried out. The healthcare professionals provided care based on a PC-IC approach to patients with diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases and/or cardiovascular disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>a qualitative study using focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, and semi-structured telephone interviews in a combined total of 46 patients with chronic diseases and multimorbidity, including 31 patients with low SES.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>an overall positive experience of participants with the PC-IC approach was observed. Discussing their health made patients feel being taken more seriously, and provided the opportunity to discuss their life and health concerns. Recommended adaptations of the PC-IC approach for patients with low SES include creating comprehensible materials and offering communication training for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the PC-IC approach seems helpful for chronic disease patients, provided that it is tailored to their skills and abilities. Several modifications for patients with low SES were suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: effectiveness of single disease management programs (DMP) in general practice may be limited for patients with low socioeconomic status (SES), as DMPs insufficiently take into account the specific problems and needs of this population. A Person-Centred Integrated Care (PC-IC) approach focusing on patient's needs could address these problems.

Aim: to explore experiences of patients with (multiple) chronic diseases with regard to the acceptability of a general practice-based PC-IC approach, with a focus on patients with low SES, and to establish which modifications are needed to tailor the approach to this group.

Design and setting: in 2021, a 6 month feasibility study in seven general practices in the Netherlands was carried out. The healthcare professionals provided care based on a PC-IC approach to patients with diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases and/or cardiovascular disorders.

Method: a qualitative study using focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, and semi-structured telephone interviews in a combined total of 46 patients with chronic diseases and multimorbidity, including 31 patients with low SES.

Results: an overall positive experience of participants with the PC-IC approach was observed. Discussing their health made patients feel being taken more seriously, and provided the opportunity to discuss their life and health concerns. Recommended adaptations of the PC-IC approach for patients with low SES include creating comprehensible materials and offering communication training for healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: the PC-IC approach seems helpful for chronic disease patients, provided that it is tailored to their skills and abilities. Several modifications for patients with low SES were suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为本的综合慢性护理患者经验,侧重于低社会经济地位的患者:一项定性研究。
背景:对于低社会经济地位(SES)患者,单一疾病管理方案(DMP)在全科实践中的有效性可能有限,因为DMP没有充分考虑到这一人群的具体问题和需求。以患者为中心的综合护理(PC-IC)方法可以解决这些问题。目的:探讨(多种)慢性疾病患者对基于一般实践的PC-IC方法的可接受性的经验,重点关注低SES患者,并确定需要哪些修改以定制适合该群体的方法。设计和环境:2021年,在荷兰进行了为期6个月的七项综合实践可行性研究。医疗保健专业人员根据PC-IC方法为糖尿病、慢性呼吸系统疾病和/或心血管疾病患者提供护理。方法:采用焦点小组讨论、深度访谈和半结构化电话访谈相结合的定性研究方法,对46例慢性多病患者进行定性研究,其中31例为低SES患者。结果:观察到PC-IC方法对参与者的总体积极体验。讨论他们的健康状况会让病人觉得自己被更认真地对待,并提供机会来讨论他们的生活和健康问题。对于低SES患者,建议采用PC-IC方法,包括创建可理解的材料,并为医疗保健专业人员提供沟通培训。结论:PC-IC方法似乎对慢性疾病患者有帮助,只要它适合他们的技能和能力。建议对低SES患者进行一些修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1