A randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of early goal-directed sedation dominated by dexmedetomidine on cerebral oxygen metabolism and inflammatory mediators in patients with severe brain injury.
Shitao Lu, Haiying Song, Yuxin Lin, Bo Song, Sheng Lin
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of early goal-directed sedation dominated by dexmedetomidine on cerebral oxygen metabolism and inflammatory mediators in patients with severe brain injury.","authors":"Shitao Lu, Haiying Song, Yuxin Lin, Bo Song, Sheng Lin","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07916-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the neuroprotective efficacy of early goal-directed sedation (EGDS) primarily governed by dexmedetomidine in patients experiencing severe traumatic brain injury, and to elucidate its potential underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>All participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the experimental group-dexmedetomidine-dominated EGDS group (group D, n = 30) and the control group-the standard propofol sedation group (group P, n = 30). Patients in the experimental group received sedation primarily with dexmedetomidine, while those in the control group received propofol sedation. Subsequently, retrograde catheterization of the internal jugular vein on the affected side was performed, blood gas analysis samples were collected, cerebral oxygen extraction rates were computed, and levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) were assessed. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group D, significant reductions were observed in the duration of ventilator dependency (p < 0.05).Compared to those documented in group P, tracheostomy incidence, and pulmonary infection rates were no different (p > 0.05). On the second, third and the seventh day, the SjvO2 levels in group D exhibited a statistically significant elevation compared to group P, while the CERO<sub>2</sub> levels were notably lower in group D than in group P (p < 0.05). The GCS scores of patients in group D was significantly higher than that of the patients in group P and the baseline value on the seventh day and the time of discharge (p < 0.05). Additionally, the IL-6 levels in group D were significantly lower than those in group P and their corresponding baseline levels on the third and seventh days (p < 0.05). The IL-1β levels were no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A predominance of dexmedetomidine in EGDS demonstrates efficacy in reducing the duration of ICU stay and ventilator dependency, enhancing cerebral oxygen metabolism, and attenuating the infiltration of inflammatory factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07916-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the neuroprotective efficacy of early goal-directed sedation (EGDS) primarily governed by dexmedetomidine in patients experiencing severe traumatic brain injury, and to elucidate its potential underlying mechanisms.
Data and methods: All participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the experimental group-dexmedetomidine-dominated EGDS group (group D, n = 30) and the control group-the standard propofol sedation group (group P, n = 30). Patients in the experimental group received sedation primarily with dexmedetomidine, while those in the control group received propofol sedation. Subsequently, retrograde catheterization of the internal jugular vein on the affected side was performed, blood gas analysis samples were collected, cerebral oxygen extraction rates were computed, and levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) were assessed. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results: In group D, significant reductions were observed in the duration of ventilator dependency (p < 0.05).Compared to those documented in group P, tracheostomy incidence, and pulmonary infection rates were no different (p > 0.05). On the second, third and the seventh day, the SjvO2 levels in group D exhibited a statistically significant elevation compared to group P, while the CERO2 levels were notably lower in group D than in group P (p < 0.05). The GCS scores of patients in group D was significantly higher than that of the patients in group P and the baseline value on the seventh day and the time of discharge (p < 0.05). Additionally, the IL-6 levels in group D were significantly lower than those in group P and their corresponding baseline levels on the third and seventh days (p < 0.05). The IL-1β levels were no significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusion: A predominance of dexmedetomidine in EGDS demonstrates efficacy in reducing the duration of ICU stay and ventilator dependency, enhancing cerebral oxygen metabolism, and attenuating the infiltration of inflammatory factors.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.