Plasmatic variability of direct oral anticoagulants in people with atrial fibrillation and previous gastric surgery: a pilot case series.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07937-3
Michele Romoli, Maria Vitiello, Enrico Maria Lotti, Giuseppe D'Antuono, Arianna Berardo, Claudia Faini, Valentina Tudisco, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Marco Longoni
{"title":"Plasmatic variability of direct oral anticoagulants in people with atrial fibrillation and previous gastric surgery: a pilot case series.","authors":"Michele Romoli, Maria Vitiello, Enrico Maria Lotti, Giuseppe D'Antuono, Arianna Berardo, Claudia Faini, Valentina Tudisco, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Marco Longoni","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07937-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on cardioembolic prevention with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with previous gastric surgery are lacking. We report inter- and intra-individual differences in DOAC concentration in people with gastric surgery, to identify potential treatment options.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with previous gastric surgery receiving DOAC for AF as stroke secondary prevention, and undergoing peak-trough DOAC plasmatic testing were selected from the regional EDDIE-AF registry. DOAC levels were tested at least 75-102 h after DOAC initiation with Siemens Innovance® assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients with previous gastric surgery were included (mean age 75 years, 50% women). Overall, only 20/36 tests were within range (55.5%; apixaban 75.0%; dabigatran 0%; edoxaban 64.3%; rivaroxaban 33.3%). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran failed to reach therapeutic peak-trough concentrations. Apixaban and edoxaban reached therapeutic levels in 4/6 and 3/7 cases respectively, with marginal out-of-target concentrations in all remaining cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data support a consistent variability in DOAC absorption after gastric surgery, suggesting that implementation of DOAC plasmatic testing may help in ensuring therapeutic levels are met whenever DOACs are preferred over warfarin.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07937-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data on cardioembolic prevention with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with previous gastric surgery are lacking. We report inter- and intra-individual differences in DOAC concentration in people with gastric surgery, to identify potential treatment options.

Methods: Patients with previous gastric surgery receiving DOAC for AF as stroke secondary prevention, and undergoing peak-trough DOAC plasmatic testing were selected from the regional EDDIE-AF registry. DOAC levels were tested at least 75-102 h after DOAC initiation with Siemens Innovance® assays.

Results: Eight patients with previous gastric surgery were included (mean age 75 years, 50% women). Overall, only 20/36 tests were within range (55.5%; apixaban 75.0%; dabigatran 0%; edoxaban 64.3%; rivaroxaban 33.3%). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran failed to reach therapeutic peak-trough concentrations. Apixaban and edoxaban reached therapeutic levels in 4/6 and 3/7 cases respectively, with marginal out-of-target concentrations in all remaining cases.

Conclusions: Our data support a consistent variability in DOAC absorption after gastric surgery, suggesting that implementation of DOAC plasmatic testing may help in ensuring therapeutic levels are met whenever DOACs are preferred over warfarin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
AChR-blocking antibodies and complement system dynamics: evaluating their interplay and clinical implications in myasthenia gravis. First byte syndrome successfully treated with parotid gland botulinum toxin injection. Plasmatic variability of direct oral anticoagulants in people with atrial fibrillation and previous gastric surgery: a pilot case series. The clinical reality of "disappeared" lateral posterior choroidal artery aneurysm: case report. A randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of early goal-directed sedation dominated by dexmedetomidine on cerebral oxygen metabolism and inflammatory mediators in patients with severe brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1