Non-conventional deep brain stimulation in a network model of movement disorders.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ad9c7d
Nada Yousif, Peter G Bain, Dipankar Nandi, Roman Borisyuk
{"title":"Non-conventional deep brain stimulation in a network model of movement disorders.","authors":"Nada Yousif, Peter G Bain, Dipankar Nandi, Roman Borisyuk","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad9c7d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders is a well-established clinical treatment. Over the last few decades, over 200,000 people have been treated by DBS worldwide for several neurological conditions, including Parkinson's disease and Essential Tremor. DBS involves implanting electrodes into disorder-specific targets in the brain and applying an electric current. Although the hardware has developed in recent years, the clinically used stimulation pattern has remained as a regular frequency square pulse. Recent studies have suggested that phase-locking, coordinated reset or irregular patterns may be as or more effective at desynchronising the pathological neural activity. Such studies have shown efficacy using detailed neuron models or highly simplified networks and considered one frequency band. We previously described a population level model which generates oscillatory activity in both the beta band (20 Hz) and the tremor band (4 Hz). Here we use this model to look at the impact of applying regular, irregular and phase dependent bursts of stimulation, and show how this influences both tremor- and beta-band activity. We found that bursts are as or more effective at suppressing the pathological oscillations compared to continuous DBS. Importantly however, at higher amplitudes we found that the stimulus drove the network activity, as seen previously. Strikingly, this suppression was most apparent for the tremor band oscillations, with beta band pathological activity being more resistant to the burst stimulation compared to continuous, conventional DBS. Furthermore, our simulations showed that phase-locked bursts of stimulation did not convey much improvement on regular bursts of oscillation. Using a genetic algorithm optimisation approach to find the best stimulation parameters for regular, irregular and phase-locked bursts, we confirmed that tremor band oscillations could be more readily suppressed. Our results allow exploration of stimulation mechanisms at the network level to formulate testable predictions regarding parameter settings in DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad9c7d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders is a well-established clinical treatment. Over the last few decades, over 200,000 people have been treated by DBS worldwide for several neurological conditions, including Parkinson's disease and Essential Tremor. DBS involves implanting electrodes into disorder-specific targets in the brain and applying an electric current. Although the hardware has developed in recent years, the clinically used stimulation pattern has remained as a regular frequency square pulse. Recent studies have suggested that phase-locking, coordinated reset or irregular patterns may be as or more effective at desynchronising the pathological neural activity. Such studies have shown efficacy using detailed neuron models or highly simplified networks and considered one frequency band. We previously described a population level model which generates oscillatory activity in both the beta band (20 Hz) and the tremor band (4 Hz). Here we use this model to look at the impact of applying regular, irregular and phase dependent bursts of stimulation, and show how this influences both tremor- and beta-band activity. We found that bursts are as or more effective at suppressing the pathological oscillations compared to continuous DBS. Importantly however, at higher amplitudes we found that the stimulus drove the network activity, as seen previously. Strikingly, this suppression was most apparent for the tremor band oscillations, with beta band pathological activity being more resistant to the burst stimulation compared to continuous, conventional DBS. Furthermore, our simulations showed that phase-locked bursts of stimulation did not convey much improvement on regular bursts of oscillation. Using a genetic algorithm optimisation approach to find the best stimulation parameters for regular, irregular and phase-locked bursts, we confirmed that tremor band oscillations could be more readily suppressed. Our results allow exploration of stimulation mechanisms at the network level to formulate testable predictions regarding parameter settings in DBS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非传统脑深部刺激在运动障碍网络模型中的应用。
传统的脑深部刺激(DBS)治疗运动障碍是一种成熟的临床治疗方法。在过去的几十年里,全球已有 20 多万人接受了脑深部刺激治疗,用于治疗包括帕金森病和本质性震颤在内的多种神经系统疾病。DBS 包括将电极植入大脑中特定的紊乱靶点并施加电流。虽然近年来硬件有所发展,但临床上使用的刺激模式仍然是固定频率的方形脉冲。最近的研究表明,锁相、协调复位或不规则模式可能对病态神经活动的去同步化同样有效,甚至更加有效。这些研究使用了详细的神经元模型或高度简化的网络,并考虑了一个频段,从而显示了其功效。我们以前曾描述过一个群体级模型,该模型可在β波段(20赫兹)和震颤波段(4赫兹)产生振荡活动。在此,我们使用该模型研究了有规律、无规律和相位相关的突发刺激的影响,并展示了这对震颤和贝塔波段活动的影响。我们发现,与连续的 DBS 相比,脉冲串在抑制病理振荡方面同样有效,甚至更有效。但重要的是,我们发现在振幅较高时,刺激会驱动网络活动,这与之前的研究结果相同。令人震惊的是,这种抑制作用在震颤带振荡中最为明显,与连续、传统的 DBS 相比,β 带病理活动对脉冲串刺激的抵抗力更强。此外,我们的模拟结果表明,锁相突发刺激对常规突发振荡的改善作用不大。我们采用遗传算法优化方法,为常规、不规则和锁相猝发寻找最佳刺激参数,结果证实震颤带振荡更容易被抑制。我们的研究结果有助于在网络水平上探索刺激机制,从而对 DBS 的参数设置做出可检验的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Biological cell response to electric field: a review of equivalent circuit models and future challenges. A novel hollow-core antiresonant fiber-based biosensor for blood component detection in the THz regime. Simulations of the potential for diffraction enhanced imaging at 8 kev using polycapillary optics. Determining event-related desynchronization onset latency of foot dorsiflexion in people with multiple sclerosis using the cluster depth tests. Automated detection of traumatic bleeding in CT images using 3D U-Net# and multi-organ segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1