Understanding ethnic inequalities in diagnostic intervals of cancer: a cohort study of patients presenting suspected cancer symptoms to general practitioners in England.
Tanimola Martins, Liz Down, Alfred Samuels, Deepthi Lavu, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Richard Neal
{"title":"Understanding ethnic inequalities in diagnostic intervals of cancer: a cohort study of patients presenting suspected cancer symptoms to general practitioners in England.","authors":"Tanimola Martins, Liz Down, Alfred Samuels, Deepthi Lavu, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Richard Neal","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>UK Asian and black patients experience longer cancer diagnostic intervals - period between initial symptomatic presentation in primary care and cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether these differences are due to prolonged primary care intervals (period between first primary care presentation and secondary care referral), referral interval (period between referral and first secondary-care appointment) or secondary care interval (period between the first secondary care appointment and diagnosis).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a cohort study of patients with seven common cancers (breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, oesophagogastric, myeloma, and ovarian), diagnosed after presenting symptoms in English primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information on symptom presentation and cancer diagnosis was extracted from cancer registry-linked primary care data. Accelerated failure-time models were used to investigate ethnic differences across all four intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all sites, diagnostic intervals were longer for Asian and black patients compared to white patients. Site-specific analyses showed that, for myeloma, lung, prostate, and colorectal, the secondary care interval was longer in Asian and black patients who also had longer primary care interval in breast and colorectal cancer. There was little evidence of ethnic differences in referral interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found evidence of ethnic differences in diagnostic intervals, with prolonged secondary care intervals for four common cancers and prolonged primary care intervals for two. Although these differences are relatively modest, they are unjustified and may indicate shortcomings in healthcare delivery that disproportionately affect ethnic minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: UK Asian and black patients experience longer cancer diagnostic intervals - period between initial symptomatic presentation in primary care and cancer diagnosis.
Aim: To determine whether these differences are due to prolonged primary care intervals (period between first primary care presentation and secondary care referral), referral interval (period between referral and first secondary-care appointment) or secondary care interval (period between the first secondary care appointment and diagnosis).
Design and setting: We conducted a cohort study of patients with seven common cancers (breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, oesophagogastric, myeloma, and ovarian), diagnosed after presenting symptoms in English primary care.
Methods: Information on symptom presentation and cancer diagnosis was extracted from cancer registry-linked primary care data. Accelerated failure-time models were used to investigate ethnic differences across all four intervals.
Results: Across all sites, diagnostic intervals were longer for Asian and black patients compared to white patients. Site-specific analyses showed that, for myeloma, lung, prostate, and colorectal, the secondary care interval was longer in Asian and black patients who also had longer primary care interval in breast and colorectal cancer. There was little evidence of ethnic differences in referral interval.
Conclusion: We found evidence of ethnic differences in diagnostic intervals, with prolonged secondary care intervals for four common cancers and prolonged primary care intervals for two. Although these differences are relatively modest, they are unjustified and may indicate shortcomings in healthcare delivery that disproportionately affect ethnic minorities.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.