Understanding ethnic inequalities in diagnostic intervals of cancer: a cohort study of patients presenting suspected cancer symptoms to general practitioners in England.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518
Tanimola Martins, Liz Down, Alfred Samuels, Deepthi Lavu, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Richard Neal
{"title":"Understanding ethnic inequalities in diagnostic intervals of cancer: a cohort study of patients presenting suspected cancer symptoms to general practitioners in England.","authors":"Tanimola Martins, Liz Down, Alfred Samuels, Deepthi Lavu, William Hamilton, Gary A Abel, Richard Neal","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>UK Asian and black patients experience longer cancer diagnostic intervals - period between initial symptomatic presentation in primary care and cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether these differences are due to prolonged primary care intervals (period between first primary care presentation and secondary care referral), referral interval (period between referral and first secondary-care appointment) or secondary care interval (period between the first secondary care appointment and diagnosis).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We conducted a cohort study of patients with seven common cancers (breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, oesophagogastric, myeloma, and ovarian), diagnosed after presenting symptoms in English primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information on symptom presentation and cancer diagnosis was extracted from cancer registry-linked primary care data. Accelerated failure-time models were used to investigate ethnic differences across all four intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all sites, diagnostic intervals were longer for Asian and black patients compared to white patients. Site-specific analyses showed that, for myeloma, lung, prostate, and colorectal, the secondary care interval was longer in Asian and black patients who also had longer primary care interval in breast and colorectal cancer. There was little evidence of ethnic differences in referral interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found evidence of ethnic differences in diagnostic intervals, with prolonged secondary care intervals for four common cancers and prolonged primary care intervals for two. Although these differences are relatively modest, they are unjustified and may indicate shortcomings in healthcare delivery that disproportionately affect ethnic minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: UK Asian and black patients experience longer cancer diagnostic intervals - period between initial symptomatic presentation in primary care and cancer diagnosis.

Aim: To determine whether these differences are due to prolonged primary care intervals (period between first primary care presentation and secondary care referral), referral interval (period between referral and first secondary-care appointment) or secondary care interval (period between the first secondary care appointment and diagnosis).

Design and setting: We conducted a cohort study of patients with seven common cancers (breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, oesophagogastric, myeloma, and ovarian), diagnosed after presenting symptoms in English primary care.

Methods: Information on symptom presentation and cancer diagnosis was extracted from cancer registry-linked primary care data. Accelerated failure-time models were used to investigate ethnic differences across all four intervals.

Results: Across all sites, diagnostic intervals were longer for Asian and black patients compared to white patients. Site-specific analyses showed that, for myeloma, lung, prostate, and colorectal, the secondary care interval was longer in Asian and black patients who also had longer primary care interval in breast and colorectal cancer. There was little evidence of ethnic differences in referral interval.

Conclusion: We found evidence of ethnic differences in diagnostic intervals, with prolonged secondary care intervals for four common cancers and prolonged primary care intervals for two. Although these differences are relatively modest, they are unjustified and may indicate shortcomings in healthcare delivery that disproportionately affect ethnic minorities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解癌症诊断间隔的种族不平等:对英格兰全科医生提出疑似癌症症状的患者的队列研究。
背景:英国亚裔和黑人患者经历较长的癌症诊断间隔-在初级保健的初始症状表现和癌症诊断之间的时间。目的:确定这些差异是否由于初级保健间隔(首次初级保健就诊到二级保健转诊之间的时间)、转诊间隔(转诊到第二级保健预约之间的时间)或二级保健间隔(首次二级保健预约到诊断之间的时间)的延长。设计和背景:我们对患有七种常见癌症(乳腺癌、肺癌、前列腺癌、结肠直肠癌、食管胃癌、骨髓瘤和卵巢癌)的患者进行了一项队列研究,这些患者在英国初级保健中出现症状后被诊断出来。方法:从癌症登记相关的初级保健数据中提取有关症状表现和癌症诊断的信息。加速失效时间模型用于研究所有四个区间的种族差异。结果:与白人患者相比,亚洲和黑人患者的诊断间隔时间更长。位点特异性分析显示,对于骨髓瘤、肺癌、前列腺癌和结肠直肠癌,亚洲和黑人患者的二级护理间隔更长,而乳腺癌和结肠直肠癌的初级护理间隔也更长。在转诊间隔上几乎没有种族差异的证据。结论:我们发现了诊断间隔的种族差异的证据,四种常见癌症的二级护理间隔延长,两种常见癌症的初级护理间隔延长。尽管这些差异相对较小,但它们是不合理的,可能表明在医疗保健服务方面存在缺陷,对少数民族的影响不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1